If I'm RG, I'd call up Rutgers and see if they want CU to visit in 2020. If so, I'd take that payday and pay off CSU for not traveling to Ft. Collins in the last year of the current deal.
Because it's Rutgers/ outside the footprint or because you are ok with that Ft Collins game?Hard pass.
Because it's Rutgers/ outside the footprint or because you are ok with that Ft Collins game?
I don't see much upside to beating Rutgers, plus it would almost certainly be an early kickoff game and an easy one to drop after a 4 hours flight to the east coast. No thanks.Because the game in Fort Collins is preferable to a dumb east coast trip to play Rutgers (???) IMO. Neither is good.
Maybe we could get Rutgers to come to Ft. Collins and have Lady GaGa perform at halftime.Game in Fort Collins is dumb, but a game in New Jersey is so much worse.
Oklahoma has an opening for September 5, 2020.Because the game in Fort Collins is preferable to a dumb east coast trip to play Rutgers (???) IMO. Neither is good.
@ A&M and OU in one year? Ouch.Oklahoma has an opening for September 5, 2020.
http://www.fbschedules.com/ncaa/big-12/oklahoma-sooners.php
I know others here don't feel the same way, but CSU has become a body bag game. The programs have been on completely different trajectories for the past 3 years and the talent gap is widening substantially. I understand not wanting the RMS at Mile High and it's lame that it finishes up in Fort Collins, but it will be a very probable win and satisfying send off to the hiatus to the series.I don't see much upside to beating Rutgers, plus it would almost certainly be an early kickoff game and an easy one to drop after a 4 hours flight to the east coast. No thanks.
Oklahoma has an opening for September 5, 2020.
http://www.fbschedules.com/ncaa/big-12/oklahoma-sooners.php
I know others here don't feel the same way, but CSU has become a body bag game. The programs have been on completely different trajectories for the past 3 years and the talent gap is widening substantially. I understand not wanting the RMS at Mile High and it's lame that it finishes up in Fort Collins, but it will be a very probable win and satisfying send off to the hiatus to the series.
I'm afraid he's going to use it as leverage on a new series with them. I don't want a new series. I want to see RG either play it and be done (less ideal) or find a replacement game that more than offsets the cost of buying the game out (ideally a neutral site game with a P5 school, but away with a return trip in future works).So we very well could get smoked in that game, but at least it would be more high profile and likely a bigger payout. Not a real fan of 1-off games, so I would want to see a return date from OU.
I think RG needs to avoid being a little too desperate to get out of that CSU game.
There will be so much black and gold in that stadium in 2020. It's going to be hilarious to see.I know others here don't feel the same way, but CSU has become a body bag game. The programs have been on completely different trajectories for the past 3 years and the talent gap is widening substantially. I understand not wanting the RMS at Mile High and it's lame that it finishes up in Fort Collins, but it will be a very probable win and satisfying send off to the hiatus to the series.
I could get behind thatAsk Nebraska if they will play a neutral site game in 2020 and back out of the CSU game. Do you think they would say yes to Mile High? Their current OOC that year is South Dakota State, Central Michigan and Cincinnati.
EDIT: HOLY ****, Nebraska-CU in Vegas 2020 opener.
I think that would be best case scenario. Okay a more meaningful game against an opponent Cu fans would travel for and ditch the CSU game at the same time. Could be rough having essentially two away games against Nebraska with frost and A&M but it would be a blast to play them 5 years in a row. If it were up to me we would play every year anyways.I could get behind that
ECU travels an average of 750 miles (1,200 kilometers) for its road football games, the team will pay $430,000 to fly Allegiant Air.
Moving a football team around the country isn't easy. Including players, coaches and staff, the contingent can number 150 or more, requiring a medium-range jet like Boeing's 737. Teams generally fly out Friday, return after the game on Saturday, and often want the plane to sit idle in between.
Letting a plane that size sit on the tarmac was acceptable to the airlines until they began limiting the number of seats available in an effort to boost fares. With ticket prices now going up, the carriers can make far more money putting those 737s into continuous service.
Facing high travel demand, airlines are cutting back on the number of planes and crews available to charter, leaving colleges and some pro sports leagues scrambling.
Jennifer Bulla, who manages travel for Ohio State, spent "a sleepless week" after United Airlines canceled its agreement to fly the Buckeyes in 2017 and 2018.
American Airlines recently cut its number of National Football League charters to three from a reported nine. "It made more sense to make sure we were prioritizing the regular passenger operations," American spokesman Joshua Freed said.
JetBlue, the Pirates' preferred carrier, told ECU its charters were no longer available. Doug McGraw, a JetBlue spokesman, said the airline continues to operate some charter flights but is "focused on deploying our aircraft to meet demands for scheduled service."
Greg Raiff, chief executive of charter operator Private Jet Services, says he's fielding more calls from college coordinators like Smith: "They say, 'Hey, if these airlines won't fly the Miami Dolphins, what's the chance they're going to fly my college?'"
Illinois's football team will take a four-hour bus trip to play at Iowa this year, in lieu of the 26-minute charter they've taken in the past. They'll probably bus to Wisconsin next year, according to Tim Knox, who handles the team's travel. When Illinois last put out its bids for a charter partner, none of the major airlines were interested. No JetBlue, no United, and no Delta. "At the end of the day, they just don't need us anymore," Knox said.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sport...ball-charter-bus-airplane-20170531-story.html
Hopefully he is listening to fans, a lot of time has passed since it was leaked they were near a deal and now. He already dealt with the backlash went on local radio saying he wanted to games on campus and CsU didn’t and that was the hold up. No reason to bring it up again.I feel like we are going to continue the series with CSU somehow. I wish we wouldn't, but I fear RG will end up doing it.
I’d like to see a rotating Front Range series, including Boise State and Utah State. Build the regional brand.
In thier good years, they are very Boise State-ish. And it seemed they had a few Poly names on thier team. Wouldn’t hurt to get those eyes on CU every so often.I do not mind playing some Front Range teams, but how is playing Utah State going to help a regional brand? We already play Utah every year.
Because the game in Fort Collins is preferable to a dumb east coast trip to play Rutgers (???) IMO. Neither is good.
I think you over-rate them. I can't remember Utah State having Top 25 seasons, let along being anywhere near Boise State level. I do remember they gave Auburn a scare at their place one time. And they have had some good coaches.In thier good years, they are very Boise State-ish. And it seemed they had a few Poly names on thier team. Wouldn’t hurt to get those eyes on CU every so often.
Oh, hell yes!Ask Nebraska if they will play a neutral site game in 2020 and back out of the CSU game. Do you think they would say yes to Mile High? Their current OOC that year is South Dakota State, Central Michigan and Cincinnati.
EDIT: HOLY ****, Nebraska-CU in Vegas 2020 opener.