Unlike the Texas replacement receivers from last night who are already on the Biletnikoff watchlist and their quarterback who is now a Heisman finalist.These Florida replacement receivers are atrocious
Seems a little excessive to claim some huge victory tonight for OU/big 12 but hey
But that's the point, no?Yeah, even without opt outs, Florida is severely over ranked.
How quickly OU fans forget being down 49-14 at halftime last year....Yeah, even without opt outs, Florida is severely over ranked.
But that's the point, no?
Absolutely.Partly. But they will use the excuse of the opt outs.
I think it is easy to see that the conference has somewhat of an inflated bowl record over the years (it is the best) but I don’t think you can deny the top of the conference has done a pretty good job kicking the **** out of teams on the national stage. I think the main issue is that a lot of bottom tier programs claim to be superior just because of affiliation when they are not.But that's the point, no?
The narratives surrounding it get a little tiresome for me.I think it is easy to see that the conference has somewhat of an inflated bowl record over the years (it is the best) but I don’t think you can deny the top of the conference has done a pretty good job kicking the **** out of teams on the national stage. I think the main issue is that a lot of bottom tier programs claim to be superior just because of affiliation when they are not.
The best team in the big 12 just beat the crap out of a team missing I think 8 starters and playing their starting QB for a quarter. That same team lost three games in conference (I get they played well against bama) including a late loss at home to LSU. Hardly a win to try and put down the SEC that is still favored to win another national championship this year.
And that’s fine but four different programs have won National titles from the conference over the last 20 years too. Bama really took over there but even during that time 3 other programs made it to the national championship in auburn, Georgia and LSU. It is impressive to look back on and just shows you how well a lot of SEC programs recruit.The narratives surrounding it get a little tiresome for me.
Bama aside, the heyday of the SEC (in my opinion) was from 2005 to 2011. After that, in my observation SEC teams consistently failed to live up to their rankings in out-of-conference play. 2014 was the height of that phenomenon, of course, but nothing seems to change the stories that we tell.
And in several cases, it was because the SEC was given the benefit of the doubt and given opportunities that teams with the same or better records were not.And that’s fine but four different programs have won National titles from the conference over the last 20 years too. Bama really took over there but even during that time 3 other programs made it to the national championship in auburn, Georgia and LSU. It is impressive to look back on and just shows you how well a lot of SEC programs recruit.
There isn’t one team I listed that was given the benefit of the doubt, they all deserved to be there. LsU was probably the best team in the history of college football. Auburn was an undefeated national champion. Auburn was also clearly the second best team in the country when they played Florida state. Georgia was a one loss sec champion who avenged their only loss in the championship game when they made the playoff. The issue with the sec has never really been with the top of the conference outside of the one year bama made it as the 4 seed despite not winning the SEC but I think that is one team that probably earned the benefit of the doubt.And in several cases, it was because the SEC was given the benefit of the doubt and given opportunities that teams with the same or better records were not.
That's what overrating teams from one conference does. It provides opportunity which creates the self-fulfilling prophesy.
It's like your evidence is making my point for me.
I mean opt outs are clearly a big factor when you lose your 4 top receivers and your best player on the entire team. I do agree that if they were more focused those fill in receivers would have done better and not dropped to many passes.Who will spoil OU's season next year? ISU, KSU, TTU?
I think the opt outs are less of a factor than the fact that UF let their players go home for Xmas and then came back and practiced only 3 times. That just doesn't set the mentality needed to play such a brutal game. Bowl games are often less meaningful for one opponent or the other and I'd hoped this was the year CU would catch Texas in party mode.... Oh well.
I take nothing from 2020 other than OU lost two games to decent but not great opponents.
Mullen has really turned full heel this year.
What I'm trying to say is that the opt outs certainly hurt the position group. But the mentality of those opt-outs by leaders of the team does much more damage to the notion that the team would compete without them. I am starting to think that these bowl games are just becoming silly season.I mean opt outs are clearly a big factor when you lose your 4 top receivers and your best player on the entire team. I do agree that if they were more focused those fill in receivers would have done better and not dropped to many passes.
Like a true heel!He’s just showing us who he really is... the awe shucks stuff was just an act.
Mullen has really turned full heel this year.
ACC football... not great.
Partly. But they will use the excuse of the opt outs.