BuffAlum2007
Well-Known Member
Just delaying the inevitable...
Nah that was bohn.Did Bohn do those or RG? Seems to me Bohn was long gone when those games were announced.
Did Bohn do those or RG? Seems to me Bohn was long gone when those games were announced.
Nah that was bohn.
Okey dokey. Thanks.All Bohn.
I'm really wishing I had gotten into the esports business. Huge opportunities right now.
You misspelled Notre Dame...This is going to be the death knell for a few G5 programs.
I dunno know about eating BBQ'ed Aggie, I never have tried it, but I hear it can be well, gamey.WRONG! Roadie to College Station was on my calendar, and it was going to be glorious to see another Buff victory at Kyle Field. Plus, I was looking forward to seeing the upgraded stadium (and sample Aggie BBQ).
So far about 155 years.I am looking forward to seeing for just how long the SEC will live in denial and refuse to accept reality.
I think the only conferences that are against it are the sec and the big 12. The big 12 because they can only play 9 games (which is probably not an issue the way things are going right now) and the sec because they are a bunch of bitches about scheduling.I guess I could see a scenario where conference games only could work. You can really restrict what's going on within a league and can almost ensure 3-5 byes throughout the season. You could possibly give your team two weeks off in the middle of the season to get healthy as well. At least that's my pie in the sky theory.
Which at that point will probably be about 25 programs leftThis feels like death by 1000 cuts.
If I had to say which way I would bet on, I'd put my money on no college football til fall 2021.
Totally stupid. The conference-only restriction eliminates 20% of the risk, at best? If the risk is so high that a 20% reduction is meaningful, just call it and eliminate 100% of the risk.
2020 is the worst.
I think it’s more about buying time than assuming every game has the same risk and only reducing by 20%.Totally stupid. The conference-only restriction eliminates 20% of the risk, at best? If the risk is so high that a 20% reduction is meaningful, just call it and eliminate 100% of the risk.
2020 is the worst.
I think it’s more about buying time than assuming every game has the same risk and only reducing by 20%.
That said, the extra month is probably not enough.