Rutgers is working hard to blow this game
They have succeeded. ****
Rutgers is working hard to blow this game
Knowing folks from NJ, those are the more mellow posts that didn't violate the terms of service.
My brother is crushed right now. He’s in Spain and probably stayed up for that. JFCKnowing folks from NJ, those are the more mellow posts that didn't violate the terms of service.
Ohio State fans taking that joke as well as the Nub fans are taking the running total of schools who have won tourney games before them.
Don’t be a dick.Man, what the hell got into the Beavs?
This didn't age welloooh thompson going out with 2 fouls and 12 mins left in the half. doomy.
Not at all. they got hot from 3 and also just played great. Having a guy go for 3 times his average per game in the first half didn't hurt either. OSU shooting 60% from 3 now. What a tear.This didn't age well
The NET rating has somehow managed to be worse than the RPI. The B1G got all their high NET ratings because all you have to do is play a few tough teams in the non con, then regardless of whether you won any of those games, your NET is great. Then once conference play starts, everyone has a top 50 NET rating then every game helps your rating. NET needs to adjust andjusg hammer teams for losses. Strength of Schedule can go. Strength of Record is the only thing that should matter.Maybe the Pac was underrated.
Some tinkleMan, what the hell got into the Beavs?
I mean, Oregon State didn’t have a great regular season. NET or not. They lost to a lousy Wyoming team, and followed it with a loss to a bad Portland team that didn’t win a WCC game. But they are a pretty talented team. And they’ve put it all together the last couple weeksThe NET rating has somehow managed to be worse than the RPI. The B1G got all their high NET ratings because all you have to do is play a few tough teams in the non con, then regardless of whether you won any of those games, your NET is great. Then once conference play starts, everyone has a top 50 NET rating then every game helps your rating. NET needs to adjust andjusg hammer teams for losses. Strength of Schedule can go. Strength of Record is the only thing that should matter.
I’ll leave that discussion to you bball nerds. But it’s pretty obvious that we played much better competition in the Pac than anyone realized. My kid has been complaining all season about the Big 10’s poll rankings, telling me they were way overrated. Guess he was right.The NET rating has somehow managed to be worse than the RPI. The B1G got all their high NET ratings because all you have to do is play a few tough teams in the non con, then regardless of whether you won any of those games, your NET is great. Then once conference play starts, everyone has a top 50 NET rating then every game helps your rating. NET needs to adjust andjusg hammer teams for losses. Strength of Schedule can go. Strength of Record is the only thing that should matter.
The NET also got far less OOC data than what it needs to be optimal.I mean, Oregon State didn’t have a great regular season. NET or not. They lost to a lousy Wyoming team, and followed it with a loss to a bad Portland team that didn’t win a WCC game. But they are a pretty talented team. And they’ve put it all together the last couple weeks
NET is just a tool, you look at the NET rankings and they mostly make sense. The tool is mostly fine. The problem is terrible media exposure for the Pac 12. A combination of east coast bias and incompetent Larry Scott.
You're just jealous of Huggins' hair and style!Good point. I know more about Huggins than I do Boeheim.