We are so good we are going one player short on offense?
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
2023 Buffs Depth Chart Thread
- Thread starter The Alabaster Yak
- Start date
chitownbuff
Club Member
Or we have a two-way player
Look how nice it is to be able to mention 4-5-6 additional guys that we all think may start. That is depth and talent
Slusher, Robinson, McClain, Ham, Stoutmire, etc...
Love that Charles Kelly is moving the chess pieces around.
When Prime can recruit a couple Road Grading Monsters in the middle like Alabama and Georgia have, that is when we take that step into the playoffs
Let's just kick the ball off, so pumped
Slusher, Robinson, McClain, Ham, Stoutmire, etc...
Love that Charles Kelly is moving the chess pieces around.
When Prime can recruit a couple Road Grading Monsters in the middle like Alabama and Georgia have, that is when we take that step into the playoffs
Let's just kick the ball off, so pumped
Game 1 Offense:
QB: Sanders (2), Staub (16)
RB: Hankerson (9), Smoke (8)
WR: Weaver (10), Ellis (7)
WR: Antonio (4), Miller (14)
WR: Hunter (12), Dawson (6)
WR: Horn (5), Gaines (20)
TE (when applicable): Harrison (87), Yelverton (83)
RT: Washington (78), Conner (57)
RG: Beebe (73), Young (70)
C: Wells (55), Zilinkas (58)
LG: Bailey (65), Wilty (50)
LT: Tank (69), Jatta (51)
Situational: Edwards (3)
QB: Sanders (2), Staub (16)
RB: Hankerson (9), Smoke (8)
WR: Weaver (10), Ellis (7)
WR: Antonio (4), Miller (14)
WR: Hunter (12), Dawson (6)
WR: Horn (5), Gaines (20)
TE (when applicable): Harrison (87), Yelverton (83)
RT: Washington (78), Conner (57)
RG: Beebe (73), Young (70)
C: Wells (55), Zilinkas (58)
LG: Bailey (65), Wilty (50)
LT: Tank (69), Jatta (51)
Situational: Edwards (3)
Last edited:
Is this your prediction or did you see this posted somewhere?
Game 1 Defense:
DL Cokes (99), O'Neil (88)
DL: Payne (55), Thomas (95)
OLB: McLendon (9), Alston (49)
OLB: Domineck (44), McCoy (40)
ILB: Ham (25), Brown (42)
ILB: Bentley (20), Kennedy (22)
CB: Hunter (12), Cooper (3)
CB: Stoutmire (23), McClain (1)
S: Sanders (21), Robinson (8)
S: Slusher (18), Silmon-Craig (7)
S: Woods (43), Ward (29)
DL Cokes (99), O'Neil (88)
DL: Payne (55), Thomas (95)
OLB: McLendon (9), Alston (49)
OLB: Domineck (44), McCoy (40)
ILB: Ham (25), Brown (42)
ILB: Bentley (20), Kennedy (22)
CB: Hunter (12), Cooper (3)
CB: Stoutmire (23), McClain (1)
S: Sanders (21), Robinson (8)
S: Slusher (18), Silmon-Craig (7)
S: Woods (43), Ward (29)
This is what I'm hearing as of this morning.
So it looks like Hunter will be truly playing both ways and not just in certain situations?
It all looks fairly accurate from things that have been said by various coaches over the last week or so.
Thanks. I really like how the defense has turned out. Thin at ILB but reinforcements coming. The oline has to stay healthy. This is a good roster
I think they have three guys at ILB who can play without drop off. Not sure about Brown. Once Mitchell gets up to speed, they’ll have 4 and that walk on from Tennessee, Noah Young, has also been receiving high praise. I’m less concerned with ILB now.
I’m mostly concerned with the OL. Maybe not concerned but anxious. They’re going to be the difference between winning and losing and I’m just not sure what we truly have there, both in front line talent and depth
Yep. Ham will need to prove it. We know Mitchell can play.
I question the actual talent on the oline from everywhere but center. The scheme will help, hopefully
Correction, that is a receiver who is registered for classes at Nebraska.
The only receivers who attend classes are also known as walk-ons.
I guess I’m less worried about Ham because he has obviously improved and done enough for Hart, Kelly and Prime to put him ahead of Kennedy. That’s enough for me to feel comfortable with him.
Bailey, Wells and Tank should be more than adequate. But anyone who knows anything about OL play knows it's not about the five fingers, it's about the fist.
I’ve always been a fan of the 2-4-5 Defensive scheme (and Blackjack betting progression).
Savion Washington was rated the best of the bunch, has the physical traits to be elite and knows the system. If you think Bailey, Wells and Tank are more than adequate, then I have fewer concerns about the group as a whole since I think Savion is the best of them.
JMBuffs
Well-Known Member
What’s up with McCaskill?
Prime made it sound like he's very close but they might be holding him back a little longer? It was a little vague
Probably Nebraska
It's so weird looking at a depth chart that doesn't fill me with horror. And not worrying about the 5 star CB that isn't starting.
Medford M.
Well-Known Member
Washington is probably our best O lineman. Surprised that Wilty isn't starting.
Medford M.
Well-Known Member
Who is in the dog house?
HighlandsBuff
Well-Known Member
Agreed, so long as Sanders is playing QB
If a 5* hadn't been starting back then it would have only been because he was such an out of shape knucklehead that the HC had no choice but to piss off the boosters and renege on the promises which were made to get him here.
#1 pick
Well-Known Member
Pretty much what we see in WO with Dawson filling in for Hunter.