We are so good we are going one player short on offense?I really want to know the 21 starters names and numbers. At least I am aware that we only need to learn 21 names.
We are so good we are going one player short on offense?I really want to know the 21 starters names and numbers. At least I am aware that we only need to learn 21 names.
Or we have a two-way playerWe are so good we are going one player short on offense?
Is this your prediction or did you see this posted somewhere?Game 1 Offense:
QB: Sanders (2), Staub (16)
RB: Hankerson (9), Smoke (8)
WR: Weaver (10), Ellis (7)
WR: Antonio (4), Miller (14)
WR: Hunter (12), Dawson (6)
WR: Horn (5), Gaines (20)
TE (when applicable): Harrison (87), Yelverton (83)
RT: Washington (78), Conner (57)
RG: Beebe (73), Young (70)
C: Wells (55), Zilinkas (58)
LG: Bailey (65), Wilty (50)
LT: Tank (69), Jatta (51)
This is what I'm hearing as of this morning.Is this your prediction or did you see this posted somewhere?
So it looks like Hunter will be truly playing both ways and not just in certain situations?This is what I'm hearing as of this morning.
It all looks fairly accurate from things that have been said by various coaches over the last week or so.This is what I'm hearing as of this morning.
Thanks. I really like how the defense has turned out. Thin at ILB but reinforcements coming. The oline has to stay healthy. This is a good rosterThis is what I'm hearing as of this morning.
I think they have three guys at ILB who can play without drop off. Not sure about Brown. Once Mitchell gets up to speed, they’ll have 4 and that walk on from Tennessee, Noah Young, has also been receiving high praise. I’m less concerned with ILB now.Thanks. I really like how the defense has turned out. Thin at ILB but reinforcements coming. The oline has to stay healthy. This is a good roster
Yep. Ham will need to prove it. We know Mitchell can play.I think they have three guys at ILB who can play without drop off. Not sure about Brown. Once Mitchell gets up to speed, they’ll have 4 and that walk on from Tennessee, Noah Young, has also been receiving high praise. I’m less concerned with ILB now.
I’m mostly concerned with the OL. Maybe not concerned but anxious. They’re going to be the difference between winning and losing and I’m just not sure what we truly have there, both in front line talent and depth
Correction, that is a receiver who is registered for classes at Nebraska.That is a receiver that attends classes at kNebraska.
I guess I’m less worried about Ham because he has obviously improved and done enough for Hart, Kelly and Prime to put him ahead of Kennedy. That’s enough for me to feel comfortable with him.Yep. Ham will need to prove it. We know Mitchell can play.
I question the actual talent on the oline from everywhere but center. The scheme will help, hopefully
Bailey, Wells and Tank should be more than adequate. But anyone who knows anything about OL play knows it's not about the five fingers, it's about the fist.Yep. Ham will need to prove it. We know Mitchell can play.
I question the actual talent on the oline from everywhere but center. The scheme will help, hopefully
I’ve always been a fan of the 2-4-5 Defensive scheme (and Blackjack betting progression).Game 1 Defense:
DL Cokes (99), O'Neil (88)
DL: Payne (55), Thomas (95)
OLB: McLendon (9), Alston (49)
OLB: Domineck (44), McCoy (40)
ILB: Ham (25), Brown (42)
ILB: Bentley (20), Kennedy (22)
CB: Hunter (12), Cooper (3)
CB: Stoutmire (23), McClain (1)
S: Sanders (21), Robinson (8)
S: Slusher (18), Silmon-Craig (7)
S: Woods (43), Ward (29)
Savion Washington was rated the best of the bunch, has the physical traits to be elite and knows the system. If you think Bailey, Wells and Tank are more than adequate, then I have fewer concerns about the group as a whole since I think Savion is the best of them.Bailey, Wells and Tank should be more than adequate. But anyone who knows anything about OL play knows it's not about the five fingers, it's about the fist.
Bailey, Wells and Tank should be more than adequate. But anyone who knows anything about OL play knows it's not about the five fingers, it's about the fist.
What’s up with McCaskill?Game 1 Offense:
QB: Sanders (2), Staub (16)
RB: Hankerson (9), Smoke (8)
WR: Weaver (10), Ellis (7)
WR: Antonio (4), Miller (14)
WR: Hunter (12), Dawson (6)
WR: Horn (5), Gaines (20)
TE (when applicable): Harrison (87), Yelverton (83)
RT: Washington (78), Conner (57)
RG: Beebe (73), Young (70)
C: Wells (55), Zilinkas (58)
LG: Bailey (65), Wilty (50)
LT: Tank (69), Jatta (51)
Situational: Edwards (3)
Prime made it sound like he's very close but they might be holding him back a little longer? It was a little vagueWhat’s up with McCaskill?
Probably NebraskaPrime made it sound like he's very close but they might be holding him back a little longer? It was a little vague
Washington is probably our best O lineman. Surprised that Wilty isn't starting.Bailey, Wells and Tank should be more than adequate. But anyone who knows anything about OL play knows it's not about the five fingers, it's about the fist.
Who is in the dog house?or the RB in the dog house
We can win some games with that roster
If a 5* hadn't been starting back then it would have only been because he was such an out of shape knucklehead that the HC had no choice but to piss off the boosters and renege on the promises which were made to get him here.It's so weird looking at a depth chart that doesn't fill me with horror. And not worrying about the 5 star CB that isn't starting.
Pretty much what we see in WO with Dawson filling in for Hunter.Game 1 Offense:
QB: Sanders (2), Staub (16)
RB: Hankerson (9), Smoke (8)
WR: Weaver (10), Ellis (7)
WR: Antonio (4), Miller (14)
WR: Hunter (12), Dawson (6)
WR: Horn (5), Gaines (20)
TE (when applicable): Harrison (87), Yelverton (83)
RT: Washington (78), Conner (57)
RG: Beebe (73), Young (70)
C: Wells (55), Zilinkas (58)
LG: Bailey (65), Wilty (50)
LT: Tank (69), Jatta (51)
Situational: Edwards (3)