Any word on full 2021 schedule dates?
Rick Scott is toooooooooo busy spending moneyAny word on full 2021 schedule dates?
What options and what are they weighing in about?
Not without Larry George's say so.Rick Scott is toooooooooo busy spending money
I guess I’m just confused about what options they could possibly be weighing that are causing a delay in releasing the schedule.Corona-options.
Rick Scott?Not without Larry George's say so.
given that the Pac 12 has been, by far, the most conservative P5 conference during Covid, I wouldn't be surprised if some schools are questioning whether it's too early to commit to a 2021 seasonI guess I’m just confused about what options they could possibly be weighing that are causing a delay in releasing the schedule.
given that the Pac 12 has been, by far, the most conservative P5 conference during Covid, I wouldn't be surprised if some schools are questioning whether it's too early to commit to a 2021 season
Agree with what you are saying. By the time football season starts a good chunk of the country could have been vaccinated by that time. Honestly the Pac-12 should go with a full schedule regardless of what is going on right now. If not, they will continue to be viewed as a joke of a conference by the rest of the country east of the Rockies. Also that could affect the media rights discussions with networks.
given that the Pac 12 has been, by far, the most conservative P5 conference during Covid, I wouldn't be surprised if some schools are questioning whether it's too early to commit to a 2021 season
I agree that the PAC should plan for a full season at this point. The President is predicting that all adults should be able to get vaccinated by early summer so they even have a cushion to work with.Agree with what you are saying. By the time football season starts a good chunk of the country could have been vaccinated by that time. Honestly the Pac-12 should go with a full schedule regardless of what is going on right now. If not, they will continue to be viewed as a joke of a conference by the rest of the country east of the Rockies. Also that could affect the media rights discussions with networks.
Hopefully they are able to get another P5 matchup for 2025
Hopefully they are able to get another P5 matchup for 2025
Which would be a one off at CU and absolutely no way A&M would agree to that. Its more than likely going to be a one off G5, unless something else changes in future schedules that they can get home-home set up.Texas A&M is still in search of a fourth game for 2025......just saying. I hate the CSU extension-but its on campus and not every year. Would like to see future games lined up with ****braska after 2024-I know we're both mediocre...........but how the hell are ESPN and FOX not BEGGING for more after the two classics we gave them in 2018 and 2019?
Which would be a one off at CU and absolutely no way A&M would agree to that. Its more than likely going to be a one off G5, unless something else changes in future schedules that they can get home-home set up.
That 2025 game was a home game, so he is obviously trying to replace that with another home game.Doubt it. If this played out, it would probably a one off at the Texans' stadium like the game at Mile High will be. Just noticed that and thought may be the A&M AD was pushing for CU to play them down there.....but its weird given we're scheduled to play at Houston the week before. I think odds are highest that its UNC or somebody like Wyoming (They've played one-offs at Folsom in the past and I think that's something they'd be open to again. They do not have an opponent for that date as of now).
That 2025 game was a home game, so he is obviously trying to replace that with another home game.
The neutral site could work if the numbers are similar to the Mile High game.
Which was my initial point.It won't happen that year. We have four conference games at home. Howell said Missouri asked for this because they're planning a series with Kansas that's starting that year. That's gotta be Wyoming or a Big Sky school coming in.
my badWhich was my initial point.