AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
2023 Colorado Football Schedule & Future Schedules
- Thread starter Buffnik
- Start date
I'm not following. you specifically used 'revenue', not 'earnings' -- was that intentional?
I said it in the beginning. It's a guaranteed appearance fee like you get from a bowl game. The money's more than you earn from a home game. Probably have a ticket allotment to sell and then a piece for above that, too.
apologies, I wasn't aware that an appearance fee was in play and didn't see your previous comment about that.
assuming ASU gets an appearance fee north of $3m, you make a good point. do you have some information on where that fee would come from (assume you're hearing rumors of a corporate sponsor)?
you're clearly mocking me, but I'm not understanding why. I realize I'm opening myself up for further mockery by politely asking you to explain why my question wasn't appropriate, but I'm really curious.
Here's one from 8 years ago where they say that Alabama & VA Tech split $5M for the Kickoff neutral site opener.
Neutral Site College Football Game Payouts
While technically the FBS football season kicked off last night with Abilene Christian at Georgia State, tonight we get some ranked teams and the Chick-Fil-A...
businessofcollegesports.com
CUwhit21
Club Member
Article is several years old, but the stadium pays for it and gets the revenue from the game (tickets, parking, concessions).
www.12up.com
https://www.sbnation.com/platform/a...tral-site-games-money-payouts-million-revenue
REPORT: Packers Paying Obscene Amount of Money to Host Wisconsin-LSU
Whether it's professional or college, football games cost a lot of money. Apparently if you want a college team to play a game in your professional stadium,...
www.12up.com
https://www.sbnation.com/platform/a...tral-site-games-money-payouts-million-revenue
ahoelsken
Well-Known Member
Mountain West Conference inks US$270m CBS and Fox TV deals - SportsPro
Conference members to get roughly four times the annual US$1.1m received in current cycle.
www.sportspromedia.com
How much money waits for UCLA and USC in the Big Ten Conference?
Here's a comparison of recent Pac-12 and Big Ten revenue, illustrating what USC and UCLA will receive by switching conferences.
www.latimes.com
I was dunking on CSU more than anything with that take, but my perception is their FB program is a fairly large money pit for them RN. Here's what I'm talking about-we got $33M ish in revenue from the Pac 12 deal last year. From the MWC TV deal, CSU pulls in about $4M yearly. That program has to be something people want to come see in person because the TV revenue isn't the thing at that level that it is for a school like CU (possible exclusion for the service academies-who are like BYU in the sense that they have a built in fanbase), and they haven't hit that standard (for lack of a better team) since Sparkles left there. They were mediocre under Bobo, bad under Addazio, and I didn't see a program that looked like it was trending in the right direction when I watched them play this year.
Factor in the new stadium (which I'm sure they have a fair amount of debt on).......and uh oh.
who do you think is going to be the desert version of Chik Fil A? Does it make financial sense for the Pac to pony up that kind of money if a corporation doesn't bite?Here's one from 8 years ago where they say that Alabama & VA Tech split $5M for the Kickoff neutral site opener.
Neutral Site College Football Game Payouts
While technically the FBS football season kicked off last night with Abilene Christian at Georgia State, tonight we get some ranked teams and the Chick-Fil-A...
so, you didn't actually mean revenue.Mountain West Conference inks US$270m CBS and Fox TV deals - SportsPro
Conference members to get roughly four times the annual US$1.1m received in current cycle.How much money waits for UCLA and USC in the Big Ten Conference?
Here's a comparison of recent Pac-12 and Big Ten revenue, illustrating what USC and UCLA will receive by switching conferences.
I was dunking on CSU more than anything with that take, but my perception is their FB program is a fairly large money pit for them RN. Here's what I'm talking about-we got $33M ish in revenue from the Pac 12 deal last year. From the MWC TV deal, CSU pulls in about $4M yearly. That program has to be something people want to come see in person because the TV revenue isn't the thing at that level that it is for a school like CU (possible exclusion for the service academies-who are like BYU in the sense that they have a built in fanbase), and they haven't hit that standard (for lack of a better team) since Sparkles left there. They were mediocre under Bobo, bad under Addazio, and I didn't see a program that looked like it was trending in the right direction when I watched them play this year.
Factor in the new stadium (which I'm sure they have a fair amount of debt on).......and uh oh.
How should I know who would buy sponsorship rights? It was just leaked last night by our coach.
Barstool. ESPN. Hell, ****in GQ. With Prime there is national value
You stated ASU would make more by moving the game off campus. I guess I just assumed you had some information behind that point that led you to make the claim.
Only the basics of how a neutral site game works.
Stadium Pays the main fee
Slight Juice from TV special slot/inventory upgrade
Sponsorship
Slight Juice from TV special slot/inventory upgrade
Sponsorship
Not true. The highest rated Applebees is in Phoenix.
We don’t want excuses Nik. We want results.
Who is ASU's remaining kicker now that one of them has transferred to CU?
How does he feel about kicking in Glendale vs Tempe?
How does he feel about kicking in Las Vegas vs Glendale or Tempe?
Does he have a high school soccer background?
If so, did he have any college soccer offers?
What is his career long?
I think this thread needs to arc back to topics that we can all agree are critical to our enjoyment of the game.
How does he feel about kicking in Glendale vs Tempe?
How does he feel about kicking in Las Vegas vs Glendale or Tempe?
Does he have a high school soccer background?
If so, did he have any college soccer offers?
What is his career long?
I think this thread needs to arc back to topics that we can all agree are critical to our enjoyment of the game.
And the Red Lobster on Southern Avenue in Mesa is exemplary.
So, pretend you're a network executive.
Which game will you pay more money for:
A. ASU vs CU in late September or early October. You don't know if either team will be any good; they both have new coaches and dramatically different rosters than last year. You also know that you will almost certainly have some ranked and/or "name" teams playing each other that you'll be competing with for eyeballs.
B. ASU vs CU as a week zero game. Both teams have new coaches. One team has a national name coach that every college football fan in the country will be curious to see how they do "in the bigs." You will *not* have to schedule against any other ranked or "name" teams playing each other. Oh, and every college football fan in the entire country is also in "let's get this party started" mode and most of their teams are *not* playing, so if you give them a game with any reasonable story line, they're gonna watch.
It's pretty ****ing obvious to me that game B is much more valuable, and of course you're going to pay more money to broadcast that over A.
Will you pay enough more to guarantee ASU more money than they'd get hosting game A? Almost definitely.
I sort of can't believe that people don't see the obvious value that game B has over game A.
Now.. the only question in my mind is how, if you're the P12, you're ****ing over whoever owns the broadcast rights to the already scheduled TCU-CU game in week 1. Running with option B very obviously decreases the value of that particular game broadcast.
But... the P12 DGAF about the value of that game, because it's not included in the P12 broadcast agreement. It's either in the B12's agreement and/or TCU's agreement. **** 'em.
Make no mistake, scheduling CU for a week 0 game is a power move in media rights money land - you're not just adding value to your own product, you're removing value from someone else's product.
Which game will you pay more money for:
A. ASU vs CU in late September or early October. You don't know if either team will be any good; they both have new coaches and dramatically different rosters than last year. You also know that you will almost certainly have some ranked and/or "name" teams playing each other that you'll be competing with for eyeballs.
B. ASU vs CU as a week zero game. Both teams have new coaches. One team has a national name coach that every college football fan in the country will be curious to see how they do "in the bigs." You will *not* have to schedule against any other ranked or "name" teams playing each other. Oh, and every college football fan in the entire country is also in "let's get this party started" mode and most of their teams are *not* playing, so if you give them a game with any reasonable story line, they're gonna watch.
It's pretty ****ing obvious to me that game B is much more valuable, and of course you're going to pay more money to broadcast that over A.
Will you pay enough more to guarantee ASU more money than they'd get hosting game A? Almost definitely.
I sort of can't believe that people don't see the obvious value that game B has over game A.
Now.. the only question in my mind is how, if you're the P12, you're ****ing over whoever owns the broadcast rights to the already scheduled TCU-CU game in week 1. Running with option B very obviously decreases the value of that particular game broadcast.
But... the P12 DGAF about the value of that game, because it's not included in the P12 broadcast agreement. It's either in the B12's agreement and/or TCU's agreement. **** 'em.
Make no mistake, scheduling CU for a week 0 game is a power move in media rights money land - you're not just adding value to your own product, you're removing value from someone else's product.
Darian3Hagan
'89 Player of the Year
Can we get a durn dislike button in this bull junk site?
Last 4 pages =….nothing.
My favorite is the one in Rojo Viejo
What does the thumbs down equate to for you?
An Australian like.