This makes me want to laugh and cry at the same time.Personally, I am beside myself with giddiness over the mention of 2 OL as being impressive.
This makes me want to laugh and cry at the same time.Personally, I am beside myself with giddiness over the mention of 2 OL as being impressive.
I think we are really going to like this dude. Sounds like the kind of competitor who won’t let others quit and backs it up by competing hard every rep.
Definitely feels like some good safety depth in place.
After 20 + years any kind of depth is incredible.Safety depth is incredible
Having quality depth on this team, as a CU fan, feels a bit like getting drunk… feels really cool, want more, and don’t want to have to wake up any time soon.After 20 + years any kind of depth is incredible.
We will have multiple back-ups this year who would start for multiple other teams in our conference!
Compared to starting guys who wouldn't be on our opponents two deep.
Win win. WOuldn't mind seeing both play.What do we do at (star)Safety? Slusher is a stud and he's back but Cam is balling.
Honestly think one of them should be given a long look at replacing Woods as an every down player.What do we do at (star)Safety? Slusher is a stud and he's back but Cam is balling.
Woods is in the top 8. CU has two players on that list.Honestly think one of them should be given a long look at replacing Woods as an every down player.
Have one of them take over for woods. I don't know how difficult the transition would be.What do we do at (star)Safety? Slusher is a stud and he's back but Cam is balling.
What's the top 8?Woods is in the top 8. CU has two players on that list.
See @TDforTD post above with interception leaders in the PAC12. I assumed you read that.What's the top 8?
Other than Mitchell, ILB has been awful...coverage is especially terrible from our ILBs. This may be a stretch, but can we put Woods in there during obvious passing downs?Have one of them take over for woods. I don't know how difficult the transition would be.
Edit: Yak beat me to it.
1. Meh, it's two INTsSee @TDforTD post above with interception leaders in the PAC12. I assumed you read that.
Shilo is one of the best Safeties in the Pac 12 right now. He and Woods also play different positionsWoods has been in good position and you can see him trying to guide/direct Shilo into the proper position. It is Shilo who is consistently out of position. Shilo plays WAY off receivers, allowing them to catch the ball for big chunks of yards before he attempts to tackle. It won't happen but from a proper S play perspective, Shilo should sit before Woods.
1. Meh, it's two INTs
2. One of the players I'm suggesting replace him is #1 on that list.
3. Woods looked great against TCU and made a play against CSU in OT (into quadruple coverage) that I think any of our DBs would have made. Other than that, I just feel like he's been fairly pedestrian, out of place in coverage, missed tackles, etc. Of course, I'm not watching the film and I don't know the specific mistakes or responsibilities, so I trust Kelly to make that determination.
I think they have somebody more qualified than any of us to make those decisions, some guy named Prime who might know a little bit about DB play.Woods has been in good position and you can see him trying to guide/direct Shilo into the proper position. It is Shilo who is consistently out of position. Shilo plays WAY off receivers, allowing them to catch the ball for big chunks of yards before he attempts to tackle. It won't happen but from a proper S play perspective, Shilo should sit before Woods.