Trogdor
Soy Boy
Of the big cities in Tejas, SA is way better to visit than the concrete hell holes of Houston and DFW.Thebestonly good thing about the last Alamo Bowl I attended was the tacos.
Of the big cities in Tejas, SA is way better to visit than the concrete hell holes of Houston and DFW.Thebestonly good thing about the last Alamo Bowl I attended was the tacos.
Low bar.Of the big cities in Tejas, SA is way better to visit than the concrete hell holes of Houston and DFW.
No doubt!Low bar.
I watched a battle of the alamo movie when I was kid and it had like 30 foot tall walls, like a medieval castle. When I got there I was like, so where's the Alamo? It's a mud hut postage stamp.I like San Antonio. History buffs can do the Mission Trail. There’s good Mexican food and decent bars near the riverwalk. It’s a very walkabale city with most of the good parts all within a few square miles. Good golf options for those who are interested. You can do a whole lot worse for a bowl game location.
I kind of like Fort Worth.Of the big cities in Tejas, SA is way better to visit than the concrete hell holes of Houston and DFW.
You could also take a trip to a Sleepy Little Town nearby. If you felt inclined.I like San Antonio. History buffs can do the Mission Trail. There’s good Mexican food and decent bars near the riverwalk. It’s a very walkabale city with most of the good parts all within a few square miles. Good golf options for those who are interested. You can do a whole lot worse for a bowl game location.
The Tempe of Texas.I kind of like Fort Worth.
Pro Tip. If you’ve done the River Walk before and would like something fun and a little more sophisticated, try the Pearl Brewery district just north of downtown on the river. La Gloria is fun for dinner.I like San Antonio. History buffs can do the Mission Trail. There’s good Mexican food and decent bars near the riverwalk. It’s a very walkabale city with most of the good parts all within a few square miles. Good golf options for those who are interested. You can do a whole lot worse for a bowl game location.
Can confirm, La Cantera Golf Club is very nice.I like San Antonio. History buffs can do the Mission Trail. There’s good Mexican food and decent bars near the riverwalk. It’s a very walkabale city with most of the good parts all within a few square miles. Good golf options for those who are interested. You can do a whole lot worse for a bowl game location.
I thought they communicated it pretty well..
Deadline to request tickets is today at 4 PM mst.
12/11, if your request was fulfilled (which is based on Buff Club priority) then the card is charged and fulfillment information is sent via email.
I like San Antonio. History buffs can do the Mission Trail. There’s good Mexican food and decent bars near the riverwalk. It’s a very walkabale city with most of the good parts all within a few square miles. Good golf options for those who are interested. You can do a whole lot worse for a bowl game location.
Email that went out to season ticket holders and Buffs blast!Where did u see that? Maybe they are mad at me lol
Neither of which I got. SmhEmail that went out to season ticket holders and Buffs blast!
How many tickets you looking for?Neither of which I got. Smh
Day after I bought my tickets, ones in the same section were $128 MORE.Get in price an hour before (and an hour after) the announcement yesterday was $71 on SeatGeek. It's currently $123.
There’s some really sick parts of Houston.I kind of like Fort Worth.
Watching CU get rolled in Tallahassee was one of my worst trips ever.
Pink taco was good, huh?Thebestonly good thing about the last Alamo Bowl I attended was the tacos.
Fun fact: BYU and CU have spent 30 years in the same conference, but only played 10 conference games.
The RMAC's a fun conference. Their basketball games especially are wild.That's nuts. I wonder why they didn't play every year in the Rocky Mountain Conference. It's not like that conference was super big, and travel couldn't have been that big of a problem, CU and Utah played every year.
BTW - the Rocky Mountain Conference was probably a fun regional conference. If it had lasted, we would be G5 for sure, but CU, CSU, Utah, DU, Wyo, Mines, BYU, sometimes UNC, sometimes Montana and Montana State, sometimes Utah State. It's kinda no wonder CU and Utah dominated that conference, but I bet the rivalries were pretty hardcore. IIRC, DU was our biggest rival then, though. I know they were in the 30s when my grandma was in Boulder.
Fun fact - the Rocky Mountain Conference still exists in its current incarnation, @MtnBuff's favorite conference, the RMAC.
Ask Peggy.The RMAC's a fun conference. Their basketball games especially are wild.
As far as not playing conference opponents, it seems to be just how things were then. We would seemingly play CSU, DU, and Utah every year in the Skyline, but Wyoming, BYU, and Utah State were hit or miss.
I've always wondered how 1948 Buffs fans felt about going from a regional conference to one where we aren't within 500 miles of a conference opponent. Though, I'm sure they were happy to join a better conference.
I've always wondered how 1948 Buffs fans felt about going from a regional conference to one where we aren't within 500 miles of a conference opponent. Though, I'm sure they were happy to join a better conference.
I've always thought the Utah-Colorado rivalry fron that era seemed fun and wish it had still been a real rivalry when we joined the same conference.I think the idea of going more national probably started in the 30s when we were just murdering some of the smaller schools in the conference. Utah. DU, Wyoming, and even CSU could keep up, and the other schools would sometimes have a good year, but the thought must have been that we needed bigger challenges as the school grew.
I think the craziest thing though was that Western was in the RMC for a long time, and even was competitive with a lot of the schools (including BYU). They always took their lumps when they played CU and Utah though.
Lavell, who was also an assistant at BYU for 10 years (1962-71) quipped that everybody wanted to schedule BYU as the homecoming opponent. That's how bad the school was until he turned it completely around and kept it there during his 29 years at the helm. To put it another way, in the 50 years between starting football in 1922 and hiring Lavell, BYU only had 14 winning seasons.I'm wasting time and diving into historical stuff - before Lavell Edwards, BYU had finished with a better record than CU 4 times in 50 years. They have finished with a better record than us 26 times since.
It's really hard to overstate how dreadful BYU was at football before Lavell Edwards.
I've always thought the Utah-Colorado rivalry fron that era seemed fun and wish it had still been a real rivalry when we joined the same conference.
I view the Alamo Bowl with mixed feelings, happy to play Colorado for only the third time since World War II (1981, Boulder; 1988, Freedom Bowl), but disappointed that I can't cheer for every Big-12 school in post-season play.