to me, sounds like the dad really wants to justify his decision.
wow. some gratitude from Dre's father there. Yeesh.
It was best that Dre moved on if the line of thinking was that Tad would have to commit to focus more on Dre than he did on wins if Dre was going to stay. I watched Tad trying to run the offense through Dre and feature him as a scorer this year. It failed. If Dre wants to be that guy, he made the right decision to turn pro and focus 100% of his time on developing his handle, post moves and shot because it's not Tad's job to lose games doing things that aren't effective so an individual player can be a star.
Honestly, it sounds like Dre's dad fully understands and accepts that. I don't think he was saying that Tad and the coaches failed his son, just that the next stage of Dre's development is better handled at the professional than college level. That headline was way out of bounds. Nowhere in the article did Mr. Roberson say "coaches failed", but the headline attributes that to him. Unfair to Dre, Mr. Roberson, Tad and CU. **** Henderson and **** the Denver Post.
i dont understand the Henderson hate on THIS piece. Dre's dad clearly stated that he is more concerned with Dre developing than the team winning games. I think the hate should be focused squarely towards Mr Roberson because this is a TEAM sport and good teammates do what is in the best interest of the team
i dont understand the Henderson hate on THIS piece. Dre's dad clearly stated that he is more concerned with Dre developing than the team winning games. I think the hate should be focused squarely towards Mr Roberson because this is a TEAM sport and good teammates do what is in the best interest of the team
Does anyone else find it disingenuous that Andre's dad says it was 100% Andre's decision, yet he uses the word "we" several times when discussing how the decision was reached?
You did see the headline right? Bull****
Based on all this talk revolving around the showcasing of Dre on offense and how many shots he would/should get, I decided to check the game logs from this season and see if Tad used Dre correctly. Should more of the offense have gone through Dre?
Overall record in games Dre played: 20-11
Average shots attempted by Dre: 8.87
CU's record when Dre took 9 or more shots: 10-8 (.555 win%)
CU's record when Dre took 8 or less shots: 10-3 (.769 win%)
You think Henderson writes the articles and the headlines? That would be an unusual arrangement.
All this proves is that Tad was selfishly more worried about winning games than developing Dre into a first rounder....
Does anyone else find it disingenuous that Andre's dad says it was 100% Andre's decision, yet he uses the word "we" several times when discussing how the decision was reached?
Tad's job first and foremost is to win basketball games. No matter how great of a guy he is or how clean of a program he runs, he's not going to keep his job otherwise. Second, it is the forementioned, having a respectable program that is staying out of trouble(I know administrators will argue this comes first, it doesn't). Third, graduating players/keeping them academically stable (again, administrators will say academics comes before winning basketball games, it doesn't). Fourth, developing their basketball skills to the next level.
Yeah you can definitely say it's even lower. My point remains helping an individual player showcase his skills to get to the next level especially one not expected to crack the first round isn't one of Tad's main responsibilities.I don't even agree that #4 is on the list. The job is to develop their basketball skills to win college games. I don't think that making sure the skills translate to the NBA is anywhere in the job description. It may help in recruiting if prospects believe a program plays a "NBA style", but that's a very minor thing.
Deleted by wsp4820. **** off JRK