More often than not I tend to agree, mosltyIf we can score more points there is a good chance that we will win. You lose at least 60% of the games where you don't score more than the other team.
More often than not I tend to agree, mosltyIf we can score more points there is a good chance that we will win. You lose at least 60% of the games where you don't score more than the other team.
I'm more and more convinced we need to see multiple 10+ play TD drives against this ASU game. They let you run, they let you drive.
Red zone offense must not fail.
Chiaverini hasn't shown the tendency to move away from what's working to this point.ASU Rushing marginal efficiency* = 115
I do not want to see us rack up a couple first downs running the ball and then go 3 & out on 3 straight passes. I hate when we do that.
That will come with experienceChiaverini hasn't shown the tendency to move away from what's working to this point.
Wilner thinks CU is the only "unknown" in the Pac 12 at this point, due to an undefeated record against teams combined for 1-16 record, but says it will definitely be sorted out on Saturday. Does CU beating ASU mean they are legit contenders or would there still a bit of unknown to the team at 5-0? Likewise, if CU loses to ASU, does it definitely mean they are only a mediocre 4-1 team, propped up by (one of) the easiest schedule in the country to this point?
Wilner thinks CU is the only "unknown" in the Pac 12 at this point, due to an undefeated record against teams combined for 1-16 record, but says it will definitely be sorted out on Saturday. Does CU beating ASU mean they are legit contenders or would there still a bit of unknown to the team at 5-0? Likewise, if CU loses to ASU, does it definitely mean they are only a mediocre 4-1 team, propped up by (one of) the easiest schedule in the country to this point?
Taking those 4 losses out to put it at 1-12 doesn't look much better, though, and had those teams beaten CU to be a combined 5-12, it obviously wouldn't matterThat 1-16 stat is a little misleading, I mean CU accounts for a quarter of those losses...
I think you misread what drunkralphie was saying..That will come with experience
I feel misunderstoodI think you misread what drunkralphie was saying..
I think you misread what drunkralphie was saying..
Well who gives a **** about UNH. If you take those and the CU losses away you have this.Taking those 4 losses out to put it at 1-12 doesn't look much better, though, and had those teams beaten CU to be a combined 5-12, it obviously wouldn't matter
might have added the caveat.....equal talent and not in coaching freefall disarray....On paper, both UCLA and Nebraska have better talent than CU. Although I have no idea how much of that paper talent actually remains in Lincoln.
The fuskers may have crapped the bed since but you can't say that this team hasn't handled pressure situations after watching the game in stincoln. The 1-16 stat is unfortunate but by no means does it define this team. They've taken care of business so far, hopefully they can keep it up and Wilner can shove his guesses up his ass.
Well who gives a **** about UNH. If you take those and the CU losses away you have this.
Losses: OU, Cincy, Fresno State, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois State, Troy (Backup QB), Michigan and Purdue
Wins: Arkansas
Not a good result but most of those are expected. Illinois State, Troy and Pursue are really the only disappointing results.
Well they haven’t played very well this year but hardly a bad loss.Purdue isn't IMO. Jeff Brohm is a hell of a coach IMO, and he's gonna wind up at a blue blood before he leaves coaching.
The man of Steele.
That's forked up.
Those are basically my thoughts about ASU, tbh. Happy that it’s either right or wrong for me tomorrowTime to get up for this game. The following is an example of the respect CU is getting on the ass U forum
“You realize that Colorado sucks right?
They do not have an elite qb. They have a slightly above average college qb.
They are Colorado. Low talent level across the board. We dont need to play a perfect game to beat them.
Montez is not Rosen or Darnold.
He's not even Herbert.”