I HATE Stephen A and 100 times out of 100 will take the opposite position to whatever he says... but he is spot on and I applaud him for thisTypically have no time for Stephen A, but THAT; that was brilliant. 81 pages of this blog in 2 min.
So, 99 times out of 100?I HATE Stephen A and 100 times out of 100 will take the opposite position to whatever he says... but he is spot on and I applaud him for this
I was told there'd be no math.So, 99 times out of 100?
No Everytime... this is the exception to that rule....So, 99 times out of 100?
No Everytime... this is the exception to that rule....
Also
Eh, read closer. Big 12 is merely acting like it's doing something. They're really not...Whoa! Someone finally stood up! Nice job, Big 12 leadership!
In simple terms, the Big 12 is withholding revenue from Baylor until a “third-party review” ensures Baylor’s made the necessary changes.
Depending on the timing of this review, which Baylor in its statement said is in “opportunity to demonstrate progress," these sanctions can be lifted rather quickly.
And when lifted, according to USA Today’s Dan Wolken, the money will be given back to Baylor after being held in escrow.
52 alleged rapes = 25% revenue withholding (which is almost certainly to be restored to bailer once the full PR value of the B12 "doing something" has been exhausted). So in the B12 an alleged rape costs you about 1/2% of revenue...good to know.Well the Big 12 is doing something at least with 25% revenue withheld until Baylor can prove they cleaned up their act.
http://www.espn.com/college-sports/...t-baylor-bears-future-revenue-assured-changes
Eh, read closer. Big 12 is merely acting like it's doing something. They're really not...
http://247sports.com/Bolt/Big-12-action-against-Baylor-sounds-nice-but-isnt-enough-51179015
The Big 12 isn't doing a thorough investigation of the allegations. They are looking into whether they've made the necessary changes... No, it's not good enough. This isn't even a slap on the wrist. It's a potential slap on the wrist.So... wait- let me get this straight: we had 10 straight months of "why won't someone do something about bailer" and now that the Big 12 takes the first step it's not good enough?
What if the independent third party review documents hard evidence that forms the basis for a Title IX lawsuit?
I would say it is the appearance of doing something with an incredibly small chance of a slap on the wrist. In other words, it is politically expedient bull****.The Big 12 isn't doing a thorough investigation of the allegations. They are looking into whether they've made the necessary changes... No, it's not good enough. This isn't even a slap on the wrist. It's a potential slap on the wrist.
yesssssshttp://www.cbssports.com/college-fo...on-probation-if-early-review-called-by-board/
Baylor's accreditation could be on probation soon.
teeheeSACSCOC
Big 12 and/or NCAA should shut Baylor down for athletics. No $$$ from Big 12 and death penalty from NCAA.
I know I'm dreaming but those 52 women have nightmares.
Sadly if we know about 52 what is the real number. They haven't exactly made it a safe and comfortable environment in which to report. As a husband and father of two girls I hate to even think about it.
Hell, I don't even know but why the **** does that matter anyway? 1 is too many for my taste.Didn't Stephen A. Smith put the total number at like 125?
Who the hell knows what the number is but they aren't gonna get anything most likely. Maybe a few things here and there but the death penalty won't be one of them. It's like they are gun shy since the SMU decision. Yeah but give us sanctions for letting walkons eat, something wrong with that to me.