If you could take your "arguing until you're right" mentality to this meeting, I think we'd all greatly appreciate it. K thanks.Kroll is a bad egg and needs to be informed it is not politically smart for him to unnecessarily hurt CU.
Also need to call his BS on the $8 million in student fees over 4 years going to the AD, and then tell him how much revenue the AD brings them in tuition and fees paid to the university, all of whom are charged out of state tuition even if they are in state students.
And that is just the football team.Average tuition a little over $52k.
Average room & board a little over $13k.
85 scholarship players. 85 x $65k = $5,525,000
4-year period. $5.525M x 4 = $22,100,000
Student fees over same period. $8,000,000
Profit to the university: $14,100,000
What was the argument again?
Question, how do you get to be a regent at CU? Is it a voting process or just a selection type thing? Idk, just wondered.
Voted on by Congressional District and a couple of at large candidates. Kroll came from CD 1, the same voters who brought you Diana DeGette, if that gives you any insight.Question, how do you get to be a regent at CU? Is it a voting process or just a selection type thing? Idk, just wondered.
@Darth Snow @Buffnik @L Buff walk in to a bar....If you could take your "arguing until you're right" mentality to this meeting, I think we'd all greatly appreciate it. K thanks.
You flatter. I think Nik and them do a much better job. My expertise is too... narrow. Nik gets the public opinion stuff. I just try and be right.@Darth Snow @Buffnik @L Buff walk in to a bar....
@TShekler may be kidding and all, but when you all get passionate, it's pretty, um, persuasive?
go get 'em.
I'm not kidding.
well, try and be right on this case. no better person for thatYou flatter. I think Nik and them do a much better job. My expertise is too... narrow. Nik gets the public opinion stuff. I just try and be right.
You flatter. I think Nik and them do a much better job. My expertise is too... narrow. Nik gets the public opinion stuff. I just try and be right.
I get that: "Mr. Kroll, you enjoy football games, but based your entire candidacy on a vile lie to the public about how private football funds are taking away public money from students. Are you still pursuing your nakedly political agenda here in an attempt to drum up support for a no doubt awful and similarly alternative fact heavy future political career?"I'm not sure I'm the right guy for politics. I can see myself starting my turn at the mic with, "Mr. Kroll, with all due respect, you are completely full of **** and you either know it or you are an idiot."
See?I get that: "Mr. Kroll, you enjoy football games, but based your entire candidacy on a vile lie to the public about how private football funds are taking away public money from students. Are you still pursuing your nakedly political agenda here in an attempt to drum up support for a no doubt awful and similarly alternative fact heavy future political career?"
too bare knuckle. We'd get nothing but an emotional reaction. Doubt Kuta would even publish the question.See?
agree you can soften, but that's the easy part. just win baby!too bare knuckle. We'd get nothing but an emotional reaction. Doubt Kuta would even publish the question.
Perfect. Help us, Darth Snow, you're our only hope. I need a shower.I get that: "Mr. Kroll, you enjoy football games, but based your entire candidacy on a vile lie to the public about how private football funds are taking away public money from students. Are you still pursuing your nakedly political agenda here in an attempt to drum up support for a no doubt awful and similarly alternative fact heavy future political career?"
I'm not as good at the softening as you older guys.agree you can soften, but that's the easy part. just win baby!
all you gotta do is flick it real hard.I'm not as good at the softening as you older guys.
The sad part is, I have no doubt that he's not an idiot.
It's 2017 and I still hear, "athletes make way too much money," even from very intelligent people. I always give them the "hmm, do you mean philosophically?" And then I make sure to remind them how small of a piece of the billion dollar industry pie the athletes are actually receiving so I don't have to hear that terrible opinion anymore. There are people out there who take the owner's sides on everything.
I'm certain that if a politician made a platform to reduce athlete salaries, he/she would gain some traction with it even though all of us sports fans would bust a gut laughing at how dumb that is. I think that's what happened here. No real facts but a lot of, "why do the CU athletes get so much money invested in them when you PAY to go here!"
There are also those who believe that my donation of $1,000 to the Football Excellence Fund would have gone to the University's general fund or a specific school if I hadn't given that money to athletics. Completely ignorant of how things with money work in the real world.