The majority of the guys who got snaps for the BYU, Houston and GA Tech teams are not guys that Prime had any interest in recruiting out of HS. I think he's adjusted his mentality about this, but his philosophy his first year was 100% "if you can't help the team on gameday in the upcoming season, why would I sign you?" His roster management was like he was in the NFL or at a JUCO. CFB is at least as much about talent and culture development pipeline within your roster as it is about game-ready talent at the top of your roster.
Prime seemed to evolve more each year in 2024 and 2025 recruiting on this mentality with his recruiting approach and the 2026 strategy looks like it's going to be a lot more focused on prep recruiting than previous years.
But it's not going to be fixed overnight.
2025 scholarship roster:
Seniors - 34
Juniors - 15
Sophomores - 13
Freshmen - 17
Within position groups, there's actually quite a bit of class balance but with some glaring problems where I think we panicked. IOL has 9 seniors. That's ridiculous. I'd rather sign 9 HS recruits with mediocre ratings than 9 mediocre senior transfers. Ideally, you sign 1 or 2 transfer starters and load up the rest with preps to develop (knowing you're going to redshirt at least half of those freshman OLs). Same thing at DT where we have 6 seniors. Between the 2 groups, that's 15 of our 34 seniors. If it was 5 or 6 and the other 9 or 10 were spread among the classes, we'd almost be in balance.
FWIW, I would define class balance in this era where you can backfill from attrition and the scholarship roster size has gone up to 105 (from 85) a bit differently. With redshirting, a bit skewed to freshman class so: 30 freshmen and 25 in the other 3 classes. Give or take, but about that ratio.