What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

College Football News, Rumor & Humor

I am actually pretty shocked they did this
Two reasons:

1. ESPN is increasing their investment
2. The CFP Committee is placing greater weighting on SOS/SOR and that has hurt bubble SEC teams in the past

I'm just waiting for them to announce a 5+11 CFP format where the SEC knows it's likely going to get 4-5 of the at large spots in a given year for a total of 5-6 playoff teams.
 
Two reasons:

1. ESPN is increasing their investment
2. The CFP Committee is placing greater weighting on SOS/SOR and that has hurt bubble SEC teams in the past

I'm just waiting for them to announce a 5+11 CFP format where the SEC knows it's likely going to get 4-5 of the at large spots in a given year for a total of 5-6 playoff teams.
ESPN doesn't get much value in broadcasting an SEC school beating Walnut State College 72-7. They want product that draws and keeps viewers.
 
Why it's taken so long to get to this point that was always inevitable is peak College Football. Good to see that the P4 will all be on a level playing field when it comes to conference games, although I suspect the thinking behind this from the SEC is that it's going to boost their SOR/SOS metrics and they will be rewarded and given even further BOTD when it comes to at large playoff bids.

View attachment 90295
This was really important for college football. All conferences need to play an equal number of conference games.

Because there are only limited interconference games, I think having a definite number of conference bids is the way to go for selecting CFP teams. I’m hoping that CU eventually goes to the Big Ten, rather than the SEC.
 
Almost time. Soak in this season as it’s the end of an era

Im Not Crying Youre Crying GIF
 
They are all adding a P4 game to their standard schedule though. It’s a significant change from what they’ve all mostly done and benefited from for years. They built the reputation of their conference off the backs of easier scheduling disguised as being tougher because “SEC”.
I think the biggest reason for the way SEC power exploded was Nick Saban. Urban Meyer also gets a lot of credit. Without those 2 guys choosing LSU & Florida, everything is different.
 
I think the biggest reason for the way SEC power exploded was Nick Saban. Urban Meyer also gets a lot of credit. Without those 2 guys choosing LSU & Florida, everything is different.
I agree but I’m more talking about the middle and bottom of the conference being viewed as so much better than most of the country. They were a 3-4 team conference for the most part but everyone talked about how hard it was too to bottom. The records would mostly prove that out because they all had 4 OOC games, 3 of which were relative cupcakes.

To be clear, though, their self fulfilling prophecy has done well for them and they actually are the deepest and toughest conference in the country now.
 
There's too much emphasis being put on the idea that all the P4 conferences need to play the same number of games because with the larger conferences not all schedules are created equal. Just because you play in the B1G or SEC it doesn't mean you necessarily had a tough schedule. Anyone who thinks that Indiana's 9 game conference schedule last year was tougher than OU's or Georgia's 8 game conference schedule is kidding themselves.

But that aside the SEC did need to go to 9 conference games. With the size of these conferences now everyone should really be playing 10 conference games.
 
Colorado has the home and home series with Florida in 2028 and 2029, so we have a good series planned when we are ready to get into the B1G or we are part of the new "Best of the Rest" Conference

EDIT: and then we start a 2-gamer versus MISSOURI
 
There's too much emphasis being put on the idea that all the P4 conferences need to play the same number of games because with the larger conferences not all schedules are created equal. Just because you play in the B1G or SEC it doesn't mean you necessarily had a tough schedule. Anyone who thinks that Indiana's 9 game conference schedule last year was tougher than OU's or Georgia's 8 game conference schedule is kidding themselves.

But that aside the SEC did need to go to 9 conference games. With the size of these conferences now everyone should really be playing 10 conference games.
When you cherry pick an easy schedule from the B1G and compare it to hard schedules from the SEC I see what you’re saying, but not all SEC schedules are really hard like the propaganda wants everyone to believe.
 
They are all adding a P4 game to their standard schedule though. It’s a significant change from what they’ve all mostly done and benefited from for years. They built the reputation of their conference off the backs of easier scheduling disguised as being tougher because “SEC”.
I'm worried the SEC and B1G may partner up for an OOC cross-scheduling agreement for that game which would make the SOS perception for the ACC and B12 fall even further behind.
 
I'm worried the SEC and B1G may partner up for an OOC cross-scheduling agreement for that game which would make the SOS perception for the ACC and B12 fall even further behind.
It's already at that point, IMO, but CU is actually fairly well positioned with that. Granted, who knows how the Big 12 conference schedule will be viewed by the committee a few years from now, but CU having B1G and SEC opponents on their schedule will help with their perception, assuming CU can continue to climb back to being a high level program.

OOC P4 games over the next 7 seasons

2025 - GT
2026 - @GT, @Northwestern
2027 - Northwestern
2028 - @Florida
2029 - Florida
2030 - @Mizzou
2031 - Mizzou
 
I am getting more convinced that a Third Conference is in the works to convince Notre Dame and the best brands in the ACC and Big12 to form! It essentially CREATES a property just the right size for a Streamer or other network to package up and have success with competing with the P2 as long as it has

Notre Dame
Miami
Florida State
Clemson
North Carolina
Georgia Tech
Stanford
Virginia
Colorado
Kansas
Arizona State
Arizona
Utah
BYU
TCU
Texas Tech

Pay Notre Dame $200 Million a year and pay the others $100 M and we off
 
I am getting more convinced that a Third Conference is in the works to convince Notre Dame and the best brands in the ACC and Big12 to form! It essentially CREATES a property just the right size for a Streamer or other network to package up and have success with competing with the P2 as long as it has

Notre Dame
Miami
Florida State
Clemson
North Carolina
Georgia Tech
Stanford
Virginia
Colorado
Kansas
Arizona State
Arizona
Utah
BYU
TCU
Texas Tech

Pay Notre Dame $200 Million a year and pay the others $100 M and we off
Only way they're going to get ND to join a conference is by forcing their hand and closing off the playoff to them, which I doubt can be done. Also, I don't think the media companies want three conferences. The direction that this is all likely to take is collective bargaining and pooled media rights in an NFL style super league. We are potentially a decade away from that, though.

1755893986306.png
 
Only way they're going to get ND to join a conference is by forcing their hand and closing off the playoff to them, which I doubt can be done. Also, I don't think the media companies want three conferences. The direction that this is all likely to take is collective bargaining and pooled media rights in an NFL style super league. We are potentially a decade away from that, though.

View attachment 90334

the university still has a committed TV partner, a home for its Olympic sports, and a path to the playoff,” Dinich reported. “Those have always been the keys to independence for Notre Dame.”

As long as ND has those 3 things it's unlikely they join a conference unless they decide to give in to the money. And even then a conference may have to give them a larger share but I don't see the B1G or SEC doing that.
 
As long as ND has those 3 things it's unlikely they join a conference unless they decide to give in to the money. And even then a conference may have to give them a larger share but I don't see the B1G or SEC doing that.
When the ACC eventually dissolves, they won’t have a home for Olympic sports and the landscape will be completely different around the conferences and playoff. I’m betting they will join whatever league/conference is created in the mid 2030s
 
When you cherry pick an easy schedule from the B1G and compare it to hard schedules from the SEC I see what you’re saying, but not all SEC schedules are really hard like the propaganda wants everyone to believe.

The point is that each and every team's schedule needs to be judged independently regardless of what conference they're in or how many conference games they played.
 
The point is that each and every team's schedule needs to be judged independently regardless of what conference they're in or how many conference games they played.
Sure, but most SEC programs had a total of 9 P4 games on their schedule and 3 cupcakes, one of which strategically scheduled toward the end of the season. Therefore, as a general rule, SEC programs had been scheduling their way to more wins on average every season than the B1G, Big 12 and PAC 12 and also self proclaiming having the toughest schedules.
 
Sure, but most SEC programs had a total of 9 P4 games on their schedule and 3 cupcakes, one of which strategically scheduled toward the end of the season. Therefore, as a general rule, SEC programs had been scheduling their way to more wins on average every season than the B1G, Big 12 and PAC 12 and also self proclaiming having the toughest schedules.

Playing a cupcake late in the season isn't the big advantage that so many make it out to be. Opening with a cupcake like most B1G teams do gives you the advantage of helping the team gel and provides experience for the younger players. So there's as many advantages to playing a cupcake early as there is playing one late in the season.

I will say, credit to PSU for their murderer's row of a non-conference schedule this year.
 
Playing a cupcake late in the season isn't the big advantage that so many make it out to be. Opening with a cupcake like most B1G teams do gives you the advantage of helping the team gel and provides experience for the younger players. So there's as many advantages to playing a cupcake early as there is playing one late in the season.

I will say, credit to PSU for their murderer's row of a non-conference schedule this year.
Again. The SEC primarily scheduled 3 OOC games to start the year, 2 of which were usually cupcakes, same as the B1G. The difference is that the SEC would then schedule a cupcake OOC game in November while everyone else was playing a conference game.

Not only did they have an extra cupcake on their schedules, but they would schedule it late when they knew a loss would be more devastating for their postseasons.
 
The point is that each and every team's schedule needs to be judged independently regardless of what conference they're in or how many conference games they played.
There just aren’t enough interconference games to allow for an accurate determination of strength of schedule for teams from different P4 conferences. The SEC tries to promote the idea that a 3-loss SEC team is better than a 2-loss Big 12 team. But there is not nearly enough data available to make that determination.

This is why I have become a proponent of having a definitive criteria for teams to make the CFB playoff. The less influence a selection committee has on the process, the better.
 
I am getting more convinced that a Third Conference is in the works to convince Notre Dame and the best brands in the ACC and Big12 to form! It essentially CREATES a property just the right size for a Streamer or other network to package up and have success with competing with the P2 as long as it has

Notre Dame
Miami
Florida State
Clemson
North Carolina
Georgia Tech
Stanford
Virginia
Colorado
Kansas
Arizona State
Arizona
Utah
BYU
TCU
Texas Tech

Pay Notre Dame $200 Million a year and pay the others $100 M and we off
I’m down.
 
Playing a cupcake late in the season isn't the big advantage that so many make it out to be. Opening with a cupcake like most B1G teams do gives you the advantage of helping the team gel and provides experience for the younger players. So there's as many advantages to playing a cupcake early as there is playing one late in the season.

I will say, credit to PSU for their murderer's row of a non-conference schedule this year.
I think one of each helps (unless you lose). Alabama A&M to kick it off. UMass to close it out.
 
Back
Top