True. I just think they have their eyes on taking the St. Louis and Kansas City markets from the sec and big 12.I think the B1G is the bigger threat to the ACC.
No conference has more money & they would be very attractive on the academic side to schools like UVA, UNC and GATech.
this is all fan speculation. everyone was shocked by the Notre Dame deal in 2012, and ACC fans are gun shy of making predictions. that being said, here's my ranking by perceived liklihood, assuming ND joins the ACC as a full member:
- WVU: geographic makes sense, established rivalries w/ Pitt and Tech. however, nobody seems to believe that UVA, UNC or Duke would allow WVU to join (common posts: "really? do you honestly believe that the school that Thomas Jefferson founded would let the couch burners join?!?!?!"). While some argue that Louisville is a counter example, I don't see it that way -- I think Louisville is currently viewed as a negative by the ACC. WVU is my second choice.
- Penn State: everyone is hoping that ND would be the carrot that might bring PSU over. Paterno often spoke of a desire to form a "power conference" that was East Coast based and reportedly never wanted to join the B1G -- a lot of fans are hoping that this attitude persists at PSU but I think that's dreaming. Honestly, I think losing Maryland to the B1G hurt the ACC here. PSU would be my top choice if I got to be the picker. The B1G has no grant of rights, which in a sense makes them the most poachable.
- UConn. I can argue both sides of this. If the ACC isn't going to jettison Syracuse and BC, then it makes sense to bring in UConn. OTOH, nobody in that area gives a care about CFB and I struggle to advocate for further expansion into a region with no fan support.
- Cincy. I'm not a fan, but they're trying hard.
- Navy. helps win back part of the WMA market we lost w/ Mary's departure
- Texas. when the XII was rumored to be on the brink of financial failure, discussions were rumored to be taking place between UT and the ACC. If a bunch of the XII schools cannot survive the loss of revenue from CV19, this could get restarted, especially if the B1G isn't showing interest.
- other mentions with (IMO) even lower probability:
- Central Florida, South Florida -- we already have two FL schools
- Memphis -- don't think this is as strong as Cincy or UConn and it doesn't make sense for the ACC to encroach on established SEC territory where we have no current foothold
- Tulane, Toronto -- just don't make sense for the ACC
- Maryland -- why would they come back? money trumps history.
I agree. There have been comments that it was a mistake to go Rutgers/Maryland instead of Kansas/Missouri last time. I think they want to revisit that with KU & Mizzou. They'll also never stop coveting Notre Dame. Something else to consider is that 16 teams is what's in our heads as fans but the B1G would not put that limit on themselves. If they thought it made sense to go to 20 teams, they would do so and create what would effectively be 2 full 10-member football conferences that played a championship game.True. I just think they have their eyes on taking the St. Louis and Kansas City markets from the sec and big 12.
Yeah I guess. That just seems so unnecessary to me. I think the big 10 has done a great job sticking to their roots and keeping the geography in tact (as much as you can) so I just don’t see the reason to go to 20. If anything they should just go to 16 with 11 conference games and one OOC game per year. Why be in a conference where you don’t play the majority of teams in the other division? (I’m talking to you SEC).I agree. There have been comments that it was a mistake to go Rutgers/Maryland instead of Kansas/Missouri last time. I think they want to revisit that with KU & Mizzou. They'll also never stop coveting Notre Dame. Something else to consider is that 16 teams is what's in our heads as fans but the B1G would not put that limit on themselves. If they thought it made sense to go to 20 teams, they would do so and create what would effectively be 2 full 10-member football conferences that played a championship game.
Could we eventually see a 20 team B1G and a 20 team (or two 10 team) conference(s) that end in a playoff and NC. I'd hate to see it but I think that 20-30 years from now college football is going to look very different than it does now, and it may not take 20 years for complete change to happen.I agree. There have been comments that it was a mistake to go Rutgers/Maryland instead of Kansas/Missouri last time. I think they want to revisit that with KU & Mizzou. They'll also never stop coveting Notre Dame. Something else to consider is that 16 teams is what's in our heads as fans but the B1G would not put that limit on themselves. If they thought it made sense to go to 20 teams, they would do so and create what would effectively be 2 full 10-member football conferences that played a championship game.
Yep. Things will change a lot in the next 30 years just as they did in the last 30 years.Could we eventually see a 20 team B1G and a 20 team (or two 10 team) conference(s) that end in a playoff and NC. I'd hate to see it but I think that 20-30 years from now college football is going to look very different than it does now, and it may not take 20 years for complete change to happen.
I agree.Yep. Things will change a lot in the next 30 years just as they did in the last 30 years.
I think the biggest screw up with how CFB re-aligned in the past was with how the Eastern Independents ended up all over the place. Miami, Florida State, Virginia Tech, West Virginia, Louisville, Cincinnati, Pitt, Penn State, Syracuse, Boston College, Connecticut and Rutgers would have made for a hell of a conference.
Yep. Things will change a lot in the next 30 years just as they did in the last 30 years.
I think the biggest screw up with how CFB re-aligned in the past was with how the Eastern Independents ended up all over the place. Miami, Florida State, Virginia Tech, West Virginia, Louisville, Cincinnati, Pitt, Penn State, Syracuse, Boston College, Connecticut and Rutgers would have made for a hell of a conference.
iirc, Penn State was leading the charge to form a conference but didn't want any basketball-only schools. They were right.Most of these teams were in the Big East conference and I always thought that if the Big East could have lured PSU they may have survived as a football conference
Iowa St to the Big 10?Logically, West Virginia goes to the ACC, which allows the big 10 to take Kansas and Iowa State. Which means that will never happen.
Seems to fit with their teams but could be a reach too lol I just feel bad for that program because they support the hell out of that schoolIowa St to the Big 10?
Maybe they’d want a pair for Iowa? I don’t think they have a chance anyways due to academics. Although Nebraska is in that conference.Seems to fit with their teams but could be a reach too lol I just feel bad for that program because they support the hell out of that school
I thought Iowa State was a pretty decent school but maybe I’m wrong. They are aau and everything right? But yes I was thinking a pair with Iowa in the footprint.Maybe they’d want a pair for Iowa? I don’t think they have a chance anyways due to academics. Although ****braska is in that conference.
ISU does have a good following though. I was impressed with their presence at the last ncaa tournament in Denver. Their fans were everywhere
I thought they were always at the bottom of the big 12 but shows you what I know!Iowa State has outstanding academics.
You’re thinking of KSU!I thought they were always at the bottom of the big 12 but shows you what I know!
FIFYYou’re thinking of KjSU!
Not sure about the rest of the school but they have a very good engineering school, especially for Aero Engineering. I work with a ton of very smart Cyclones.Maybe they’d want a pair for Iowa? I don’t think they have a chance anyways due to academics. Although ****braska is in that conference.
ISU does have a good following though. I was impressed with their presence at the last ncaa tournament in Denver. Their fans were everywhere
This is the whole issue. Iowa isn't that big a media market to start with and Iowa get most of the attention.ISU wouldn’t add anything media wise that the Big Ten doesn’t already get with Iowa.
More specifically, the money will be made from selling quality content, not from controlling media markets. Regional geography won't matter as much as quality product in the cord cutting era.It’s cute that some of you still think geography, cultural fit, natural rivalries, tradition and prestige are bigger factors than $$$$$$.
Lone Star said it best: “We aren’t just doing this for money. We’re doing it for a sh!tload of money!”
CU is a bit of an outlier, sitting on the opposite side of the continental divide from all of your conference partners is not a trivial geographic oddity.If geography doesn’t matter then why is West Virginia the only real outlier in all of this?
False.CU is a bit of an outlier, sitting on the opposite side of the continental divide from all of your conference partners is not a trivial geographic oddity.
Please expand.False.