What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

College Football News, Rumor & Humor

Have to wonder how many ASU players were asymptomatic spreaders at the time they played USC.

This thing might get really ugly fast.

If Oregon State's outbreak is worse, it'll be Cal.

Let's get contingency plans (especially with an outbreak at ASU and something happening in Corvallis) ready for next Saturday early next week.
 
Last edited:
Have to wonder how many ASU players were asymptomatic spreaders at the time they played USC.

This thing might get really ugly fast.
There’s not much evidence that players contract it on the field of play. Even the storming of the field in South Bend has resulted in no player positives to this point
 
There’s not much evidence that players contract it on the field of play. Even the storming of the field in South Bend has resulted in no player positives to this point
Yeah, but let's use our brains on this one. No masks, heavy breathing, close proximity. What environment could be more conducive to spreading it quickly? If players are asymptomatic positive carriers, they're going to spread it on the field. Let's hope all the testing they do regularly means that no one is playing with it. The South Bend issue, however, is a whole different idiotic story. It would be hard to fathom there wasn't some spreading going on there.
 
Yeah, but let's use our brains on this one. No masks, heavy breathing, close proximity. What environment could be more conducive to spreading it quickly? If players are asymptomatic positive carriers, they're going to spread it on the field. Let's hope all the testing they do regularly means that no one is playing with it. The South Bend issue, however, is a whole different idiotic story. It would be hard to fathom there wasn't some spreading going on there.
You don’t just automatically contract a virus just because you’re around someone that has it or were breathed on.
 
Maybe we would NOT be spiking if areas of the country that are as dumb as SEC mud listened to Trump handled it better earlier on?
What evidence to you have to support this claim? Do you really think opening beaches in Florida in May has any impact on covid in Colorado, California, or Oregon in November?
 
What evidence to you have to support this claim? Do you really think opening beaches in Florida in May has any impact on covid in Colorado, California, or Oregon in November?
Common sense. Study the data, I'm not interested in doing your homework for you. But yes, infection rates (in Florida in October) absolutely have an impact on covid in Colorado, California and Oregon. Absolutely. 40-some percent of our population listen to the lies spewed by the Mango Manchurian here. Common sense.
 
What evidence to you have to support this claim? Do you really think opening beaches in Florida in May has any impact on covid in Colorado, California, or Oregon in November?
Yes, I think lackadaisical protocols in tourist hubs lead to increased case rates in the places those tourists return to.

Edit: this is from March, but here’s the evidence you requested.
 
Last edited:
Common sense. Study the data, I'm not interested in doing your homework for you. But yes, infection rates (in Florida in October) absolutely have an impact on covid in Colorado, California and Oregon. Absolutely. 40-some percent of our population listen to the lies spewed by the Mango Manchurian here. Common sense.
As long as we have cars and airplanes and trucks with passengers going from state to state what happens in other states impacts Colorado.

Look at the results of the rally in Sturgus. One study linked a potential 260,000 cases to the rally but that number has since been shown to probably be a gross over calculation.

What we don know is that within a couple weeks of the rally ending we had hundreds of confirmed cases in multiple states with at least one death. Since then who knows how many more have been infected in the chain that leads directly to one week in South Dakota.

As long as the R rate of the the disease is over 1.0 (and all indications are that right now that number is significantly higher and rising) any spreader event in one state has potential consequences for other states as well.

Unfortunately simply being out of the house in some states seems to be participating in a spreader event as significant parts of the population refuses to take simple precautions to protect others.
 
Common sense. Study the data, I'm not interested in doing your homework for you. But yes, infection rates (in Florida in October) absolutely have an impact on covid in Colorado, California and Oregon. Absolutely. 40-some percent of our population listen to the lies spewed by the Mango Manchurian here. Common sense.
Read the post. I said Florida in May, not Florida in October. Or do you consider "earlier on" as in October, a month after the 2020 FBS season started? No need to reply, thanks for keeping politics out of the football forums.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top