What is the lovefest for the "best" x number of teams? No other sport determines who plays for the championship by picking the "best" teams. What would the NFL be like if they scrapped the playoff and just decided well the best teams are NE, SEA, LA, and KC because that is how we feel. Champions are decided by who wins when it matters. Part of the regular season is getting battle tested. Go to 8 team playoff, each P5 conf gets 1 autobid to their champ, award 1 autobid to the highest ranked G5 champ and 2 at large which can be any team. This emphasizes the importance of winning your conference first, neutralizes the effect of disparities in scheduling, and awards teams for having strong ooc opponents (as primer for conference play, getting an at large bid, and seeding). Who gives a **** if the ACC or Pac-12 or B1G champ has 2 or 3 losses. Maybe they lost a road ooc game and 2 tight conference games. If Alabama is truly deserving they will win their conference title game or get the at large bid and make it through. I think people are really afraid that a UCF could come in and knock off a couple big names or that a 2 loss B1G champ might be better than a SEC champ game winner. The only reason to have the committee and limit to 4 teams is to preserve the power structure and status quo. Real champions would rather determine it on the field.