Houston or BYU.
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
Conference Expansion - Big 12 is a tire fire
- Thread starter hokiehead
- Start date
CVilleBuff
Well-Known Member
I think BYU might be the better choice (much as I hate them), but Houston would be easier/more compatible for many reasons.
Looks like a good place. So cool you gotta wear shades.
BYU is a great choice in most cases...except the Sunday thing. Not sure if the Big 12 can get around the Sunday thing.
BYU is the speculation.
Deleted member 807
Guest
BigXII has a thing for flirting with the cougars.
**** BYU. Their handling of sexual assault cases on campus - and an honor code that enables attackers to silence their victims - puts them in a league with **** bailer for scuzziness. (Now they appear to about to be literally in a league with them.)
Seriously, **** BYU.
Seriously, **** BYU.
B12 deserves **** Bailer west.
Football only school on a reduced conference distribution.
No need for a geographic "travel partner," solves Sunday issue, and makes the $ more attractive for the current B12 schools.
Also, while the media companies may have been interested in redoing the contract to ammend the "add teams, get more money loophole," it's possible that the conference told them to pound sand "we don't care about maintaining good relations for the 'next contract,' hell, this whole thing is going to blow up in 2024 anyway, so we expect you to honor the contract as written."
CVilleBuff
Well-Known Member
Definitely, at least in football. That geographic bridge is needed though, especially if the conference stretches 2,000 miles E-W from Morgantown to Provo
If tv **** on their deal I'll belly lol
Of course not. It costs the networks more money, while revenue is dropping.
Pretty crazy to think about all the movement a couple years ago and which conference made the right choice. If CU keeps up the football program is there any doubt that the Pac-10 made the best moves by bringing in Colorado and Utah? CU and Utah have both been very good on the basketball court, Utah has been plenty competitive after the first year in football and CU looks to be making a step back towards relevancy. Big-10 added Maryland and Rutgers so they are definitely in last. SEC did great adding A&M but Missouri seems like an odd fit long term. Big-12 lost 4 teams, added 2 good schools but missed out terribly on Louisville.
What. A. Sh!tshow.
@PAC12Guy takes offense / exception to that statement.
hahahaha
lol hold up. The conference has done all this just so they can leverage more money out of their TV contract, and the networks are going to do it? WOW.
CVilleBuff
Well-Known Member
If ISU/KU/KSU were smart they'd push hard for expansion to avoid playing all of the top TX/OK schools every season. Easier route to bowls.
Dodd also pointed out that a few schools have interim or retiring presidents. It's not great timing in that regard
Dodd also pointed out that a few schools have interim or retiring presidents. It's not great timing in that regard
Uncorked champagne (sparkling wine for Provo) somewhere in Cincy.
So that cinci sheet has been disproved. That isn't their university logo. Cincinatti is lower case in the official log.
