Menu
What's new
By:
Filters
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

CU Assistant Coach Hiring Thread

Da Lama said:
6-7
Click to expand...
Stanford should have been a win regardless of OL play, but I tend to think an average OL beats them, Arizona, Oregon State, and UCLA at a minimum and at that point, how is Shedeur feeling and does he play against Utah cause if so, we win that too. USC came down to a failed onside kick.

In my mind, Oregon and probably WSU, although who knows how things would have played out down the stretch, are the only no hopers regardless of OL play.
 
Darth Snow said:
Query for the board: if it took 75% of our recruiting/NIL budget to get enough OL to make next year's OL above average, is that worth it?
Click to expand...
Yes. Protecting 2 is priority number one. So much so, they had to create a tag line for it.
 
Preston Slaughter said:
Are analysts allowed to have contact with players and recruits? It seems like Sapp's greatest asset at the moment would be recruiting.
Click to expand...
They can have contact with them on campus, yes. They can't go on the road and recruit. For current players, they can't do any on-field coaching, but they can be there with the coaches. They can also talk with players in the facilities, attend meetings, do film study, etc with players and coaches.

Basically, Analysts just can't be on the practice or game field putting players through drills or coaching them directly.
 
The Alabaster Yak said:
They can have contact with them on campus, yes. They can't go on the road and recruit. For current players, they can't do any on-field coaching, but they can be there with the coaches. They can also talk with players in the facilities, attend meetings, do film study, etc with players and coaches.

Basically, Analysts just can't be on the practice or game field putting players through drills or coaching them directly.
Click to expand...
This seems like the correct spot to break him in then.
 
Big Jim said:
Not sure how points 2 and 3 have any bearing on 1.
Click to expand...
They do not have a major bearing, but he is a man that played big time Big12 Football with now SEC Oklahoma, and he is a Colorado guy, so in-state recruiting for long-term development guys would be stronger than it has been in a long time
 
4BienemyTDs said:
They do not have a major bearing, but he is a man that played big time Big12 Football with now SEC Oklahoma, and he is a Colorado guy, so in-state recruiting for long-term development guys would be stronger than it has been in a long time
Click to expand...
Given that most of his connects are outside of Colorado, I don’t think we can conclude that his hire would necessarily make the Colorado OL crooting pipeline stronger than it’s been in a long time.
 
Big Jim said:
WTF would CU want a strong Colorado prep pipeline? I understand getting a player each year, two in a good year for prep football, but not a freaking pipeline.
Click to expand...
Colorado has OL/TE talent that routinely goes elsewhere and contributes. In some cases (Loadholt is an example), they blossom into real/great players. It would be nice to retain that small subsection of players.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top