No. It’s not. Unless the terms are “you don’t have to pay back the loan”, then it doesn’t matter what the terms are.Hate to say it, but bing bong is correct here. It is dependent on the terms of the loan.
No. It’s not. Unless the terms are “you don’t have to pay back the loan”, then it doesn’t matter what the terms are.Hate to say it, but bing bong is correct here. It is dependent on the terms of the loan.
Except we know the loan was used to cover the deficit from the lower revenues in 2020 from Covid. The loan was used to cover losses. Our competition didn’t have to take out a loan to cover their losses.Well, I am waiting to see what this new coaching staff's salary pool has increased to because the quality has increased significantly. If the only way they were able to increase it to this point was to take a loan, I would say it's being used to improve something, arguably the most important thing to the success of the program. Maybe they also used it to help boost the recruiting infrastructure and hire new folks in that department. Both of those would qualify as investing in the program with the goal of seeing a good ROI.
The respective schools covered the deficit from other sources. Either from operating revenues elsewhere in the school or from existing liquidity.If they didn't take out a loan to cover the losess. How did they pay for the losses? I am asking because I dont know.
The respective schools covered the deficit from other sources. Either from operating revenues elsewhere in the school or from existing liquidity.
CU has a lot of resources. The school itself isn’t hurting for money. Quite the opposite, in fact. The annual operating budget for CU-Boulder is over $2Billion per year. The AD budget shortfall was something like $18MM. That’s less than one percent of the operating budget for the entire campus.But every one was having financial problems not just CU. Where is CU going to find the money? From what sources? I am asking because I have no idea.
Do we know that's all it was used for?Except we know the loan was used to cover the deficit from the lower revenues in 2020 from Covid. The loan was used to cover losses. Our competition didn’t have to take out a loan to cover their losses.
Cancer research, duh.Do we know that's all it was used for?
CU has a lot of resources. The school itself isn’t hurting for money. Quite the opposite, in fact. The annual operating budget for CU-Boulder is over $2Billion per year. The AD budget shortfall was something like $18MM. That’s less than one percent of the operating budget for the entire campus.
This.Let’s look at this a different way. Let’s assume that the terms really do matter. In this hypothetical, 11 of 12 schools decided the terms were unfavorable and opted against taking the loan.
Chancellor’s or their equivalents across academia are recruited for opportunities elsewhere all the time, just like head football coaches. If he’s some sort of administrative wizard, one might ask why has Phil been at CU forever?So Phil is playing chess while the Presidents & Chancellors at USC, UCLA, ASU, UofA, Utah, Stanford, Cal, Oregon, Oregon State, UW and WSU are playing checkers. Seems legit.
This.Chancellor’s or their equivalents across academia are recruited for opportunities elsewhere all the time, just like head football coaches. If he’s some sort of administrative wizard, one might ask why has Phil been at CU forever?
CU tries to run the A/D as a standalone P&L. Our competition runs it part of a bigger Sales & Marketing expense overhead. That is a huge difference.If we aren’t parsing the balance sheet, cash flow, p+l, I don’t see how we can make a strong assessment of good or bad.
3.75 is cheap money and if they were smart (IF being the operating word here), then that loan could be a boon to anyone smart enough to use it correctly.
That said, if our financial acumen at the top level of CU is “pay some bills on credit” and the thought process stopped there without a greater plan for investment and growth, then we should roll a guillotine out.
Did you know they call CU the Harvard of the West?CU tries to run the A/D as a standalone P&L. Our competition runs it part of a bigger Sales & Marketing expense overhead. That is a huge difference.
College sports is no longer run as a stand alone business. It's instead the face of the University. Either you want that or you don't. Ivy League said no thanks.
I think it will be quiet for a bit since the enrollment period is full and there's the 2nd High School signing day coming up. CU will continue to recruit in the portal, but I wouldn't expect a lot of movement until after Spring Ball, where there will be more entries from all teams. Getting transfers here for the spring was huge, hopefully KD will be very particular from here because having a couple open scholarships could prove to be very strategic come summer.Are we getting any exciting Portal additions soon? That means infinitely more to me than a loan. Rates have been historically low. It’s gonna be okay.
Will this influx of new coaches coax more talent in the door? This is the only thing I care about, aside from Turley working his magic in the weight room. LFG.
We can’t drop any sports. We are basically at the minimum to be considered D-1.one more note about this loan, recall that some Pac 12 schools, including Stanford, actually dropped sports during Covid. CU didn't.
if we consider the possibility that taking the loan prevented us from dropping sports where peer institutions did, maybe the loan wasn't a horrible decision.
Yeah but how many varsity sports did Stanford have compared to CU before COVID? Pretty sure Stanford still has more varsity sports than anyone else in conference even after dropping some.one more note about this loan, recall that some Pac 12 schools, including Stanford, actually dropped sports during Covid. CU didn't.
if we consider the possibility that taking the loan prevented us from dropping sports where peer institutions did, maybe the loan wasn't a horrible decision.
I don't think that's correct. we have 6 men's and 9 women's, I believe the NCAA would allow us to drop one women's sport.We can’t drop any sports. We are basically at the minimum to be considered D-1.
not disagreeing, but wrt whether taking the loan was a good decision at the time it was made, my point is that if it saved an entire varsity sport at CU it may not have been a horrible decision. That Stanford had a plethora of varsity teams above the NCAA minimum speaks more to their fiscal situation and decisions made for decades leading up to Covid.Yeah but how many varsity sports did Stanford have compared to CU before COVID? Pretty sure Stanford still has more varsity sports than anyone else in conference even after dropping some.
edit: looked it up and Stanford has 24 varsity sports (most in the conference), while CU has 13 (least in the conference). Even Cal, with all their budget issues, carries 23 sports.
Title IX prevents us from dropping any womens sports.I don't think that's correct. we have 6 men's and 9 women's, I believe the NCAA would allow us to drop one women's sport.
not disagreeing, but wrt whether taking the loan was a good decision at the time it was made, my point is that if it saved an entire varsity sport at CU it may not have been a horrible decision. That Stanford had a plethora of varsity teams above the NCAA minimum speaks more to their fiscal situation and decisions made for decades leading up to Covid.
that is not trueTitle IX prevents us from dropping any womens sports.
Pretty sure it is. We have more womens sports, but still have far more male athletes. We are still unbalanced.that is not true
He's got bigger problems like fixing his ****ing printer already.Let's hold any praise until they actually land some prep recruits. Offers mean nothing if you strike out on 99/100 prospects.
Why did t we just take out an 18 months same as cash loan? That’s what I do.I would imagine that most institutions are just covering it without an expectation for the AD to pay it back, even at 0% interest. That's the whole point of this discussion, that CU expects the AD to do things that other ADs don't have to do, such as cover the full cost of "out-of-state" tuition even though the actual cost to the University is the same for all kids, regardless of what state they come from. Out of State tuition is what the market will bare, not what it costs to educate the kid.
Just the numbers, best I can figure with online calculators: Say we borrowed $50,000,000 at 3.75%. Over 10 years to pay it back, we would pay a total of $60,000,000.If we aren’t parsing the balance sheet, cash flow, p+l, I don’t see how we can make a strong assessment of good or bad.
3.75 is cheap money and if they were smart (IF being the operating word here), then that loan could be a boon to anyone smart enough to use it correctly.
That said, if our financial acumen at the top level of CU is “pay some bills on credit” and the thought process stopped there without a greater plan for investment and growth, then we should roll a guillotine out.