We can cure cancer in the MWC!Plus all the prestige of the school that cured cancer.
We can cure cancer in the MWC!Plus all the prestige of the school that cured cancer.
How many people, like me, aren't going to watch a product that doesn't involve their school? I don't watch FCS football because it has nothing to do with CU. I won't watch the semi pro super league because I have no interest in semi pro football.
Yesis it better to be competitive in a conference of irrelevant leftovers or getting stomped on by the likes of Ohio State, Michigan etc week after week
I think basketball tanks if we’re left out. otherwise I agree with the rest.Is this crazy?
I'm leaning toward the USC/UCLA news probably being a good thing in my life.
Either A: CU gags its way into a B1G invite that would keep us in the top tier of divisions and give us the financial resources to believe things could be great again.
Or B: CU is left out, the dream officially dies, we can stop deluding ourselves while wasting so much time/money/emotion on Buffs football, use the games as a low key social event, and realize that for basketball fans we aren't hurt by this and are probably helped by the school's budget & focus shifting to hoops.
Frankly, both options are better than what's been going on -if we're being real- since the 2003 scandal.
Is there a way to put a “middle finger” button?I find it enteresting that people on this site thought the PAC was such a great cultural fit years ago and how the Huskers made a mistake want to now get an invite to the BIG.
Stanford #2 in Learfield Cup this year behind UT. Oh…point taken.We did this to ourselves by joining a bunch of schools who have shown they don't really give a flying **** about athletics 10 years ago.
When was the last national championship this conference won in a sport that people actually watch? (Like football or mens basketball)
Adding Arizona and Colorado would give the big 10 contiguous coverage from coast to coast.
Weird that CU - Oregon was higher than any of the ones below it.Here are all the 2021 regular season games for PAC-12 and Big 12 that pulled more the 2 million viewers, sorted from most to least. The absolute numbers only tell part of the story. The competing games in the same time slot have an effect on viewers, depending on how big a game you are going up against. As you can see the OTA networks pull the best numbers, but they typically show the biggest games.
GAMES CONF NET VWRS Oklahoma-Oklahoma State Big 12 ABC 6.486M Oregon-Utah PAC-12 ABC 4.818M Texas A&M-Colorado PAC-12 FOX 4.502M West Virginia-Oklahoma Big 12 ABC 4.502M Nebraska-Oklahoma Big 12 FOX 4.210M Iowa-Iowa State Big 12 ABC 3.890M Oregon-UCLA PAC-12 ABC 3.845M Oklahoma-Baylor Big 12 FOX 3.719M TCU-Oklahoma Big 12 ABC 3.434M LSU-UCLA PAC-12 FOX 3.219M Oklahoma State-Texas Big 12 FOX 3.129M Iowa State-Oklahoma Big 12 FOX 3.103M Louisiana-Texas Big 12 FOX 2.879M Kansas State-Texas Big 12 FOX 2.861M Notre Dame-Stanford PAC-12 FOX 2.743M Oregon-Washington PAC-12 ABC 2.726M Colorado-Oregon PAC-12 FOX 2.673M Oklahoma State-Iowa State Big 12 FOX 2.659M Oklahoma-Kansas Big 12 ESPN 2.645M Oregon-Stanford PAC-12 ABC 2.641M Oklahoma-Kansas State Big 12 FOX 2.616M Oklahoma-Tulane Big 12 ABC 2.526M Texas-Baylor Big 12 ABC 2.395M Texas-TCU Big 12 ABC 2.384M Texas Tech-OU Big 12 ABC 2.370M Iowa State-Baylor Big 12 FOX 2.012M
The problem is, what does the TV money look like for that conference and how does it being a fraction of the B1G and SEC keep it even somewhat competitive for the notOregons?Actually, that's a really good base of a conference there.
I feel there’s no way Oregon doesn’t end up in the B1G. No way they are left out of a super conference. But it does seem a little telling they were left at the alter on deadline day by SC/UCLAThe problem is, what does the TV money look like for that conference and how does it being a fraction of the B1G and SEC keep it even somewhat competitive for the notOregons?
The problem is, what does the TV money look like for that conference and how does it being a fraction of the B1G and SEC keep it even somewhat competitive for the notOregons?
Denver market, being one of 2 MTZ programs and the pairing w the West Coast programs for games are about the only thing CU has going for it.
I forgot to mention the Nebraska rivalry. That game gives them a highly rated matchup even when both programs suckAt this point, it would be a surprise if Utah & CU are not in the Big Ten. That pairing has the most people after both California pairs too and is still growing fast. The key thing is that Utah recently joined the AAU which is a big deal to the B1G.
That is if you are considering the typical conference parameters that has been in place for a long time and they might no longer apply this time around.
- ****ty footballThings Colorado has going for it:
- Location (Center of the country geographically)
- Market (16th and growing)
- Destination (Great roady for fans)
- What am I missing?
LOL no it absolutely would notAt this point, it would be a surprise if Utah & CU are not in the Big Ten.
As I mentioned, I think they’d have to add successful programs in TX and CTZ like Baylor, TCU and CincyThere would need to be a few more teams involved, but it is a good start. Not necessarily catching the Big Ten and SEC, but I think with strategic adds, you could be within striking distance.
Why? There are a lot of great programs and regular tourney from outside the Big 6 basketball conferences. I'd argue that most, maybe all, of them would be less than they are in hoops if they decided to start competing for the top of FBS football.I think basketball tanks if we’re left out. otherwise I agree with the rest.
WPS!
I’m pretty sure we could eek out some wins v NW, Rutgers, Maryland, Indiana, Nebraska, Purdue, maybe even MN.This is not the good thing you think it is. Our 4-8seasons go to 1-11 in a super conference. I’d rather be competitive in the junior tier.