Big Jim
WTF?
I'm thinking that ESPN is going to be the partner.
Yep, should put Pac12 well ahead of B12 on annual payouts/school.
I'm thinking that ESPN is going to be the partner.
They not only green lit us for the only spring game on their main network but then decided to issue press and media talking about how well we did ratings wise. These are not moves you make if you’re trying to screw someone over in a deal. I think they’re definitely in.Yep, should put Pac12 well ahead of B12 on annual payouts/school.
How do you know this ? Well ahead ? lolYep, should put Pac12 well ahead of B12 on annual payouts/school.
Big Jim is as dialed in as Jason Scheer, so you should believe himHow do you know this ? Well ahead ? lol
Lol. Sheer is the farthest from anyone I trust.Big Jim is as dialed in as Jason Scheer, so you should believe him
Big Jim sits on Colorado’s big money perch. He’s going to send a letter to Greg Fluguar that outlines the hot window runs from May 11 to June 15 and then gets molten lava hot from June 16 to June 30.Big Jim is as dialed in as Jason Scheer, so you should believe him
Let us not jump the gun here. This part is incorrect
That is not correct - they are not moving any ESPN channels to ESPN + . They are prohibited from doing that based on their contracts with the cable providers. Right now there is still too big of a revenue differential between linear and streaming - they have 25 million ESPN+ subscribers @$10 per month (really less since many of those are bundled at a discount) - so about $250 million a month or $3Billion per year. They are still making $28 Billion a year off of linear programing. Until that differential shrinks they are not going to do much. But it is coming.
The shift could cost the Suns tens of millions in guaranteed money per year in the short term, but it will boost the number of households the games are available in from around 800,000 to more than 2.8 million, according to the team.
They not only green lit us for the only spring game on their main network but then decided to issue press and media talking about how well we did ratings wise. These are not moves you make if you’re trying to screw someone over in a deal. I think they’re definitely in.
@Big Jim: if you look at that FootballScoop article I posted in response to BlackNGold, I'm not so sure the P12 will get a better paying media rights deal than the Big 12. Having all games on the ESPN family of channels would make it a better overall deal.
Looks like that is what will happen. Some are predicting the beginning of the end for the B12 as a P5 program.
I think the P12 & ACC are done as P5 conferences too. It's the B1G & SEC and it will feel extra special beating the Nubs this year.
The Big12 is moving their football and men's basketball games to Mexico. They are dead set on implementing a first mover strategy to corner the market before the NFL expands further south of the border. The rumor mill has BY setting up a peso-to-USD conversion exchange that will add at least $347/team/year to the conference payout.
NoThink the P12 might go to Asia/China for the same thing?
You’re making a lot of assumptions here. First. It’s not well known CU met with anybody last weekend. Second, we wouldn’t know anything at all about the outcome of those discussions, had they occurred.Who's to say Colorado hasn't given a verbal agreement to BY ?
It's well known Colorado met with the BIG12 last weekend. If CU had told them no we would have already heard from Clownzano or Wilner, shouting from the rooftops.
We didn't.
They aren’t done if they work together. Combine the ACC/B12 and P10 together and you have a very solid high level college athletics conference with coast to coast distribution. It’s not likely because it’s a hard thing to pull off, but it would be a good move for all concerned.I think the P12 & ACC are done as P5 conferences too. It's the B1G & SEC and it will feel extra special beating the Nubs this year.
Yeah, wtf?You’re making a lot of assumptions here. First. It’s not well known CU met with anybody last weekend. Second, we wouldn’t know anything at all about the outcome of those discussions, had they occurred.
They aren’t done if they work together. Combine the ACC/B12 and P10 together and you have a very solid high level college athletics conference with coast to coast distribution. It’s not likely because it’s a hard thing to pull off, but it would be a good move for all concerned.
The playoff isn’t the thing that will keep this from happening. That’s an easy fix. The thing that makes this hard is the number of moving parts involved and the differing agendas.That assumption has been floated multiple times in the past yet end up not happening. In the case of the CFP, I don't think that would work because there would be just one auto-bid from that combined conference while the MWC, MAC, Sun Belt, AAC, and C-USA would be able to have one auto bid for their respective conference champions. Clemson & Florida State are hoping for that so they can get out of the ACC ASAP because they are receiving peanuts compared to their SEC rivals.
In this year's FCS playoffs which has a 24 team field, there were five Big Sky Conference teams and four Colonial Athletic Association teams in the playoffs including their auto bids. No team from either conference made the FCS national championship game. In the 2020 season which was played in the spring of 2021, there was a 16 team playoff bracket and five MVFC schools were in the field. One MVFC made the FCS championship game but lost that game to Sam Houston State who is joining C-USA in July.
The point is that while the B1G and SEC will send their teams to the CFP, it doesn't mean that a B1G & SEC team will win the CFP every year.
The P12, ACC, and B12 are stronger by themselves instead of as one mega conference. They could all sign with ESPN but the last thing we would want is to have ESPN all of that power over college sports.
The playoff isn’t the thing that will keep this from happening. That’s an easy fix. The thing that makes this hard is the number of moving parts involved and the differing agendas.
Hey man, first off, BJ is california sober which is just good enough for around these parts. and, most importantly, he bleeds Dodger Blue.Sarcastatroll big jim is the best big jim.
Oregon, Washington 'Vetted' And 'Cleared' To Join The Big Ten According To New Report
Conference realignment continues to be the story of college football, with the Big Ten leading the charge.www.outkick.com
Bingo. Ive been saying this as well. Streaming is likely not going to earn the revenue on a per subscriber basis like Set Top did. And there are two sides to this sword that are bad for ESPN; advertisers will not buy if they dont reach their targeted demographic. Who is subscribing to ESPN+ Disney+ Hulu? Who is not?Disney announced it earnings yesterday and there was a lot of focus on streaming and revenue from linear. I have been saying for awhile the PAC12's challenge is we have entered a new media era where you can no longer get rich off people who don't watch your product because of the cord cutting accelerating and streaming does not have the same business model -less profit.
It is hard to get a media deal at the moment because the market is shifting. Investors are no longer focusing on subscriber growth and are now focusing on margins. Companies are no longer rewarded by growth at all cost.
A few highlights
-Operating income from its cable and broadcast networks fell $1 billion, or 35% to $1.8 billion, as it was hit by lower ad revenue.
- Disney shed 4 million Disney plus subscribers last quarter (mostly low cost subscribers overseas as they raised subscription fees.
- Disney continues to slash streaming content expenses.
You can read a little more here.
Disney stock sees biggest decline in six months after subscribers miss estimates
Disney reported quarterly earnings after the bell on Wednesday. Here's what to know.finance.yahoo.com
ESPN seems to be bargain shopping rather then paying aggressively. Would you still approve of a deal that hid all P12 games on ESPN+ streaming? ESPN appears to have a lot of inventory in its other deals to fill the day.I may be in the minority but I would read this as Disney/ESPN still very much in need of P12 content. I don’t believe ESPN is out in terms of P12 discussions, just the opposite.
Is his offer one in which the LOI wants to hide a majority of the content on a streaming service? He and The Presidents probably dont like want that as they want viewers. So these delays could be where the stalemate is.I don't think anyone doubts we have a LOI from one if not multiple parties. But like I said, if we knew the final offer/ package - from ALL possible parties - then we would know what we're doing. The delay after delay after delay with excuse after excuse after excuse indicates GK has not received a total package offer that is what the PAC is looking for. Maybe (hopefully) he/ we will.
pac man keeps harping on them being the winner bc hes probably already an espn+ subscriber. My opinion, considering the layoffs, espn/disney is already in trouble. so yeah, they are bargain shopping because they already have a ton of inventory.How much is ESPN going to be willing to pay?
I keep hearing that they are treating the PAC like they are shopping at Ross or Marshals.
Strings performed that song last night!....california sober ...
I don’t think both are hurting for money and they would have easier CFP access. Money usually wins in the end but there are good reasons for staying put.