also how big is the b12 willing to get?
Both Fox & ESPN told the Big 12 they will pay any P5 school equal money. If television with money can make it happen, it will happen. They just want less mouths (conferences) to feed.
also how big is the b12 willing to get?
The sooner we know, the better...You would think someone besides a sports talk radio host from Oklahoma would’ve confirmed any of that reporting in the week since he tweeted that.
Regardless, that doesn’t answer my question. As far as I know, the distributions for bowls, playoffs, and the ncaa tournament are proportional so unless I’m not aware of something or Dodd is making the argument that there will be a higher proportion of BIG12 teams in those events, that money differential doesn’t really matter. To me, it looks like Dodd is making his classic mistake, which is opening his mouth and proving he doesn’t understand even the basics of what he’s talking about. Dude has never changed.
Actual insiders like McMurphy and Dellenger have confirmed that there is smoke to the BIG12 rumors, hell even Howell has at this point. It would be nice if we could contain the rumors to actual respected, national journalists and not Dodd, random college football fans from BIG12 country, and parody Twitter accounts.
Did you just say UO and both academics and program history in the same sentence?if uw and uo were to join CU and ua in the b12 i would feel a little better about it-- at least there will actually be some peer schools coming along with actual academics and actual program history. i can't believe stanford and cal wouldn't be invited too. what would become of Arizona state in this scenario and utah? everyone figures that wsu and osu would be ****ed too?
how does all this work? it isn't making sense, man.
I wonder if Colorado can’t make friends. We should have a collective bargaining with the 6 other AAU schools.if uw and uo were to join CU and ua in the b12 i would feel a little better about it-- at least there will actually be some peer schools coming along with actual academics and actual program history. i can't believe stanford and cal wouldn't be invited too. what would become of Arizona state in this scenario and utah? everyone figures that wsu and osu would be ****ed too?
how does all this work? it isn't making sense, man.
uo is a peer school academically and has been for decades. they have a far glitzier athletic record than we have had in the last 20 years. eugene is in many ways similar to boulder except the sun never comes out.Did you just say UO and both academics and program history in the same sentence?
I wonder if Colorado can’t make friends. We should have a collective bargaining with the 6 other AAU schools.
Instead, it appears to be:
Oregon and Washington
Cal and Stanford
Arizona and ASU
Utah on its own
And Colorado on its own
The media is putting CU and UA together but in print the UA and ASU ADs say they are a package deal.
We’re doing the lone wolf thing again from 2011 when we should have worked with Nebraska - as awful as that is - to get into the B1G. I don’t think our approach has changed and I think it’s the wrong approach.
this is what is breaking my brain--- are uw and uo going to get big invites? is that what is driving us to the b12? are we all going together? i think there are a lot more moving parts to this than CU has decided the money is better in the b12 and therefore it is leaving on its own.
If CU had not sucked in football for two decades, everyone would be our realignment friend. Other than that, we don’t have an instate partner and no real rival, so we are not connected to anyone. It’s one of the reasons that CU feels so compelled to find a landing spot.I wonder if Colorado can’t make friends. We should have a collective bargaining with the 6 other AAU schools.
Instead, it appears to be:
Oregon and Washington
Cal and Stanford
Arizona and ASU
Utah on its own
And Colorado on its own
The media is putting CU and UA together but in print the UA and ASU ADs say they are a package deal.
We’re doing the lone wolf thing again from 2011 when we should have worked with Nebraska - as awful as that is - to get into the B1G. I don’t think our approach has changed and I think it’s the wrong approach.
Unequal revenue sharing is what is driving this CU to the B12 train. CU left the B12 due to unequal revenue sharing and UO & UW is said to want to go down that path until they eventually leave for the B1G.
CU would be on the wrong side of unequal rev sharing? i thought the idea was that there would be unequal sharing of bowl game stuff and based upon tv appearances and such...
or, uw and uo want a bigger base share?
i dunno, man. this whole thing smells like a 3 day old cod in the texas sun.
i guess we will see. of course, i also thought CU would own the p12 after it got its footing back. that never happened, either.
Does the Big 10 take Oregon and Washington right now? If the answer to that is no, we're likely forcing their hands too with a move.I mean, if the 4C schools all go Big 12 as well, it’s just Seattle, Eugene and Bay Area you’re missing. Better than Stillwater, Lawrence, Manhattan, and Waco but pretty meh. Also, how many roadies does the average fan on AB go on a year? Less than one?
We’re making a case here that CU needs to stick it out with Utah. Ideally the PNW + Utah. Enough of the conference soul searching. I could see us fall into the same issue in the new B12 - no rival, no partner, isolated then left wondering where to next in 7-10 years.If CU had not sucked in football for two decades, everyone would be our realignment friend. Other than that, we don’t have an instate partner and no real rival, so we are not connected to anyone. It’s one of the reasons that CU feels so compelled to find a landing spot.
Colorado and Arizona to the big 10 would be nice.Does the Big 10 take Oregon and Washington right now? If the answer to that is no, we're likely forcing their hands too with a move.
Having leverage is fun.
There's one very easy way for CU to stay in this conference, George.We’re making a case here that CU needs to stick it out with Utah. Ideally the PNW + Utah. Enough of the conference soul searching. I could see us fall into the same issue in the new B12 - no rival, no partner, isolated then left wondering where to next in 7-10 years.
Basically, recreate the Big 8 vibe with the 6 other AAUs in the P12.
Clear your calendar on June 5th. I’ve got… I mean GK might have a trick up his ol sleeve.There's one very easy way for CU to stay in this conference, George.
Maybe you should lay off allbuffs and get back to work on the media deal.
Clear your calendar on June 5th. I’ve got… I mean GK might have a trick up his ol sleeve.
Agree. Once USC and UCLA pulled the pin, there ain't much saving this party. And the hope from apple is nothing, if apple was going to offer something meaningful, The teams in PAC would know it already, whether it's been officially announced or not. June 5th is nothing.Why does anyone think the Pac has any hope at this point?
Assume the best and Apple decides to offer $10 million a team making the total Pac contract somewhere around $30 million.
UW and UO are going to want unequal revenue share, which CU and others can't let happen.
UW and UO are never going to sign a grant of rights like the teams stuck in the ACC and can get into the Big10 and make more than the $30 million.
Pac losing USC and UCLA killed any chance of the conference surviving. Adding San Diego State or any other combination of schools does nothing to increase revenue.
Someone just pull the plug already.
Clear your calendar on June 5th. I’ve got… I mean GK might have a trick up his ol sleeve.
The only hope of Pac12 survival at this point is a media deal on par (or in spitting distance) with the Big 12 AND the BIG not extending an offer to OU, UW, Cal or Stanford. Odds of both happening??Why does anyone think the Pac has any hope at this point?
Assume the best and Apple decides to offer $10 million a team making the total Pac contract somewhere around $30 million.
UW and UO are going to want unequal revenue share, which CU and others can't let happen.
UW and UO are never going to sign a grant of rights like the teams stuck in the ACC and can get into the Big10 and make more than the $30 million.
Pac losing USC and UCLA killed any chance of the conference surviving. Adding San Diego State or any other combination of schools does nothing to increase revenue.
Someone just pull the plug already.
Other than the fact that there are zero appealing matchups in the Big XII, the main reason that I would prefer us to stay with the Pac12 is that we will have leverage. I do not want us committing to anything that requires a longer than 3-5 year commitment. Give Prime everything he needs and let him cook for a few years. At that point, see where we fit. Does anyone think that the Big XII won't want us in 3 years? Look at who they're pursuing. If the B1G and SEC don't want us at that point, fine - do what we need to for long term success. Right now is all about maintaining flexibility.Why does anyone think the Pac has any hope at this point?
Assume the best and Apple decides to offer $10 million a team making the total Pac contract somewhere around $30 million.
UW and UO are going to want unequal revenue share, which CU and others can't let happen.
UW and UO are never going to sign a grant of rights like the teams stuck in the ACC and can get into the Big10 and make more than the $30 million.
Pac losing USC and UCLA killed any chance of the conference surviving. Adding San Diego State or any other combination of schools does nothing to increase revenue.
Someone just pull the plug already.
100% this.And keeping Prime happy.
You do that by paying salary increases for him and the staff after year 1. You can't do that when the new Pac TV deal is going to be paying less than CU currently makes.100% this.
Clear your calendar on June 5th. I’ve got… I mean GK might have a trick up his ol sleeve.