If that's the case, I hope Kroenke negotiates the media deal so we don't have to witness that chit.WSU
OSU
ASU
UofA
UU
BYU
CU
Tech
Okie Lite
KSU
ISU
Houston
Cincy
TCU
****bailer
UCF
The **** 16.
Enjoy.
The Big Doggy Bag.WSU
OSU
ASU
UofA
UU
BYU
CU
Tech
Okie Lite
KSU
ISU
Houston
Cincy
TCU
****bailer
UCF
The **** 16.
Enjoy.
You think the ACC is going to sit idle here? Or how about Clemson, Miami, Florida and N Carolina in particular?
There are some big names that are not going to sit still.
I don't expect Oregon, Washington, Cal or Stanford to fall as hard as we will.
My question is what will happen with ASU or UofA. They too picked a bad time to be irrelevant in football.
I don't see what Cal and Stanford bring to the table purely as football programs when you ignore their location.
Stanford - $$$$$$$$$
Cal - location and probably being dragged by Stanford
Puke. But probably better than the alternative of a PAC/MWC conference
Nobody is going to be dragged
This whole deal is now going to involve your "Ownership/Donor/NIL Group Pool"
Put up or shut up
CU must focus on either getting off the mat and going all in, or move accordingly
I do not want to play Nebraska again by the way, they are buying recruits hand over fist, and we will not likely beat them again, so let's retire the series with our last two wins
The possibility of a USC +5 means there’s a chance CU is in that group. I honestly don’t know if I want that to happen. The landscape of college football has changed so dramatically and I really don’t like the direction it’s going.
A Big 8 with CU, OSU, KU, ISU, KSU, CSU, Utah and BYU sounds like a pretty decent conference that I could enjoy watching. Solid football, high level hoops, and none of the absurdity that we are seeing from the likes of USC, UT and A&M. Let the big dogs do their thing. I’m tired of playing (and losing) in that sandbox.
Fair enough, what do you think is driving conference realignment?
Puke. But probably better than the alternative of a PAC/MWC conference
So, the PAC 12 structure has essentially an EXIT / OFF RAMP that everyone can execute right now and can leave without paying the conference a dime?That would suck. I'd rather go to the MWC.
Puke. But probably better than the alternative of a PAC/MWC conference
Puke. But probably better than the alternative of a PAC/MWC conference
Cal brings literally nothing. Less than CU because CU at least has history.Stanford - $$$$$$$$$
Cal - location and probably being dragged by Stanford
So, the PAC 12 structure has essentially an EXIT / OFF RAMP that everyone can execute right now and can leave without paying the conference a dime?
If the Big 12 does add us, Utah, and the Arizona schools, that's fine. I'd be okay with it. No big dog who can create a headache and it probably keeps a seat at the table.
So, the Boosters essentially have/had no confidence in the structure and operation of the PAC 12 and thus we are sitting lifeless until a bigger move is made and then they are all in, or if it blows up, we just find a landing spotI’m honestly wondering if this is what those two boosters were referring to when they tweeted about us winning a national championship again. If we end up being part of this, I could definitely see why they might be thinking that.
the meh 16I could totally alter my perspective to enjoy football again in that conference. I would never watch "national college football" again and be really happy not to.
The Moderate 16? The Reasonable 16? The Modest 16? Hmm...
No. Boosters were talking about something big coming up. Being very secretive. The hope is that they knew this was coming I guess.So, the Boosters essentially have/had no confidence in the structure and operation of the PAC 12 and thus we are sitting lifeless until a bigger move is made and then they are all in, or if it blows up, we just find a landing spot