What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

CU has rejoined the Big 12 and broken college football - talking out asses continues

The conference that:

- commanded the largest media contract in college sports after expanding to 12
- refused to sell a percentage of its network to a media giant like the B1G did to drive distribution, avoid all of those infrastructure costs, and draw almost pure profit with little expense against it
- located its production studios in the Bay Area despite literally having Hollywood in your conference (or as an alternative, in Las Vegas which is low cost, in the geographic center of the conference, and is residence for many of the top event & showbiz people on the planet)
- located its corporate office in the financial district of San Francisco, one of the most outrageously expensive real estate & labor markets in the country
- located its football championship game in San Francisco with disastrous attendance which embarrassed the conference (later moved to Las Vegas, thankfully)
- refused to consider unequal revenue based on performance (like being picked up for national broadcasts or your regional PACN outperforming others) - which killed UT negotiations since the conference wouldn't give them extra for LHN among other things
- unbalanced the schedules by initially treating the CA schools differently by having them all play each other every year... but we're too dumb to promote other rivalries which could have been done from the start with 3 regional pods & a championship game of the 2 highest finishers overall at the end instead of divisions
- wasted tremendous resources and squandered current opportunities by pursuing Asian markets including conference games in Australia and China and by focusing on tech companies for media deals long before they were ready to enter the sports business
- moved to a 9-game schedule with FCS opponents vigorously discouraged, which resulted in 54 extra losses from conference games each year along with a higher probability of non-conference losses with most members ending up with at least 1 additional FBS opponent per year
- voted against extending an invitation to OU and OSU because while each were R1 neither was AAU and they would have reduced academic prestige of the conference
- voted against moving on Big 12 and G5 targets when the Big 12 was completely destabilized (I have no doubt that at that time it could have become a Pac-16 through UH, TCU, OSU and KU)
- never was able to negotiate a "Conference Challenge" in hoops with any other Power 6 conference
- allowed a corrupt Commissioner organization which manipulated referees, grifted from the conference, and stole from cable partners
- likely voted against adding SDSU and SMU after media companies said they saw value in making DFW and SoCal part of the footprint
- failed the PR and branding side of things so badly that the conference was a national punchline despite having CFB media allies in Klatt and Fowler from CU alone

Wilner was a cheerleader and water carrier for all of this.
When I keep telling ya'll the teams added will be SMU, Tulane, and Rice, ya'll laugh about value as if these schools Presidents give a damn. It's all about academic prestige and old money. The PAC is asleep at the wheel and I doubt they will wake up. Oregon, Washington, Arizona, and Colorado will be gone and their super rich and wealthy conference will be on Apple TV so you can watch it in Japan, Mexico, or America, you just can't watch it on cable no matter where you are at. Congrats Pac-12, you played yourself
 
I remember people saying this about SoCal when the move to the Pac 12 was going down but I don’t think it actually made a difference once they were there.

Colorado had more success recruiting Texas when it was elite and the program wasn’t swimming in cash from donations when they were in the Pac 12.
There is some data I would love to see:

West coast donations per year before and after joining the pac corrected for win/loss.

Same for west coast fan/alums at road and home games before and after and correlated as a percentage so as to compare to alums in the b12 footprint

Rocky Mountain alums and fans road game attendance before and after and again correlated as a percentage of a total regional number.

Where did your whales come from before and after— broken down in lots of ways

And so forth.

The things that jumped out at me today from the talking points include: the mention and focus on time zones. The mention of fox and espn as brands and their linear reach. The acknowledgment of potential damage to their west coast base. The inability to recruit Texas and not do better in ca.

Like most or all of the west coast folks I am bummed but time will tell if we jumped too soon or whatever.

I concur that the pac did this to itself
 
I have followed this stuff for way too long.
1. SDSU isn't an option.
2. Cal has NEVER been an option.
3. The attitude is to get AZ and wait and see if UO and UW want in. If they feel they don't have a shot to get into the B1G anytime soon they might do better in the B12. Rumor are UO/UW have previously met with Yormark and are doing so TONIGHT (could be BS) UO had or is having a last minute board meeting today.
4. UU has burned a lot of bridges with the B12 leaders so they really are odd man out.
5. Maybe posturing but some have leaked max 3 more teams and stop at 16. Again could be posturing for scarcity.
6. Yormark is a NE sort of guy and he wants UConn and ESPN wants them in too as their hometownish team and the NYC market (though i don't see it much) The Conf Pres will have to be convinced and that will only come with a hard odd number.
7. Most have been very happy Texas is gone while considering OU as a big fat traitor. We are hoping they have a similar trajectory as Nebraska (and, sorry, you) after they leave.
8. Most everyone is glad you are back but the "truckstop" and "12anon" bull**** pisses a lot of people off.
9. You are tops academically the second you are in unless UW joins.
10. It feels like Yormark is actually DOING something where past B12 commissioners sat on their asses. The Rucker park B12 bball clinic last week, some crap in Mexico etc etc At least he is trying things even if they end up being fluff.

I think the next couple years of the new 4, the old 1 and whoever else is added should be a blast. Too bad you weren't here THIS year to send UT and OU out with L's.
On SDSU/SMU-I would give the Pac 12 schools a month. If they continue to dither (which I expect), I'd honestly add those two if I'm BY. Add them, and the last get out of jail free card Kliavkoff and co. can now play gets taken away from them.
 
Number 8 warms my heart. Since you are the official translator from the mountain elite people to the rednecks on the plains, please tell them "kiss my ass, Q-Anon mother****ers." Thanks in advance! You're doing great work!

Also, could we get a pinot grigio up in here? And maybe some gluten free crackers?
LOL I love my Jayhawks. But also have one of my degrees from UW (was there when we won the championship - we would have KILLED Miami that year) but I try not to judge if someone ONLY has a degree from CU :)
 
The Commissioner can only do what the members approve.

In the Pac-12, that meant 10 votes on business issues from government entities overseen by politicians and managed by professors with the other 2 from private entities that experience the world as West Coast Ivies so think a business deal happens because others approach you with a bunch of money to get your name associated with the project.

So there was never a real world business sense, to the point where they saw the conference network as primarily a vehicle to televise all Pac-12 sports to celebrate its gender diversity and Olympic athletics excellence rather than featuring football to draw ratings and make money.
I see the problem.....They are assholes
 
Number 8 warms my heart. Since you are the official translator from the mountain elite people to the rednecks on the plains, please tell them "kiss my ass, Q-Anon mother****ers." Thanks in advance! You're doing great work!

Also, could we get a pinot grigio up in here? And maybe some gluten free crackers?
Usually I'd be in favor, but after I ride share a SmartCar back from my weekly Covid booster shot followed by nude yoga and THC massage and finish fulfilling my sacred trust as a pet guardian to a rescue of mixed parentage, my holistic life coach & spirit guide recommends that I hydrate and load up on pH balanced rain water with live probiotics along with a light superfood meal of açaí and Goji berries over quinoa gently dusted with Ka'Chava then relax by slipping into natural fiber, coexist PJs from a business I found that donates all its profits to Planned Parenthood and The Trevor Project while doing some light reading of The New Yorker under an environmentally conscious mood light to the sweet sound of a humpback whale soundtrack that donates to Greenpeace and PETA.

You know. Typical Thursday.

Could we make it Saturday? That's my cheat day and a grige or three sounds marvelous. It needs to be organic and locally sourced, of course. And I'll eat just about anything vegan and gluten free, so I'm easy.
 
Do you get more donations from alums who care enough about athletics to come to sporting events or those you can only reach via phone? Via winning or losing? Via being on TV more often with a good linear TV media contract or not?

Read my post again. I said, specifically, I wish the PAC had worked out long term. It didn't. So, what would you have us do? Cling to the ship as it goes down?
My favorite part of this move is not having read or hear about “the PAC (in all caps)” like it’s a gawdam acronym. Of all the peeves in my life, this is probably the biggest.
 
I have followed this stuff for way too long.
1. SDSU isn't an option.
2. Cal has NEVER been an option.
3. The attitude is to get AZ and wait and see if UO and UW want in. If they feel they don't have a shot to get into the B1G anytime soon they might do better in the B12. Rumor are UO/UW have previously met with Yormark and are doing so TONIGHT (could be BS) UO had or is having a last minute board meeting today.
4. UU has burned a lot of bridges with the B12 leaders so they really are odd man out.
5. Maybe posturing but some have leaked max 3 more teams and stop at 16. Again could be posturing for scarcity.
6. Yormark is a NE sort of guy and he wants UConn and ESPN wants them in too as their hometownish team and the NYC market (though i don't see it much) The Conf Pres will have to be convinced and that will only come with a hard odd number.
7. Most have been very happy Texas is gone while considering OU as a big fat traitor. We are hoping they have a similar trajectory as Nebraska (and, sorry, you) after they leave.
8. Most everyone is glad you are back but the "truckstop" and "12anon" bull**** pisses a lot of people off.
9. You are tops academically the second you are in unless UW joins.
10. It feels like Yormark is actually DOING something where past B12 commissioners sat on their asses. The Rucker park B12 bball clinic last week, some crap in Mexico etc etc At least he is trying things even if they end up being fluff.

I think the next couple years of the new 4, the old 1 and whoever else is added should be a blast. Too bad you weren't here THIS year to send UT and OU out with L's.
I have followed this stuff for way too long.
1. SDSU isn't an option.
2. Cal has NEVER been an option.
3. The attitude is to get AZ and wait and see if UO and UW want in. If they feel they don't have a shot to get into the B1G anytime soon they might do better in the B12. Rumor are UO/UW have previously met with Yormark and are doing so TONIGHT (could be BS) UO had or is having a last minute board meeting today.
4. UU has burned a lot of bridges with the B12 leaders so they really are odd man out.
5. Maybe posturing but some have leaked max 3 more teams and stop at 16. Again could be posturing for scarcity.
6. Yormark is a NE sort of guy and he wants UConn and ESPN wants them in too as their hometownish team and the NYC market (though i don't see it much) The Conf Pres will have to be convinced and that will only come with a hard odd number.
7. Most have been very happy Texas is gone while considering OU as a big fat traitor. We are hoping they have a similar trajectory as Nebraska (and, sorry, you) after they leave.
8. Most everyone is glad you are back but the "truckstop" and "12anon" bull**** pisses a lot of people off.
9. You are tops academically the second you are in unless UW joins.
10. It feels like Yormark is actually DOING something where past B12 commissioners sat on their asses. The Rucker park B12 bball clinic last week, some crap in Mexico etc etc At least he is trying things even if they end up being fluff.

I think the next couple years of the new 4, the old 1 and whoever else is added should be a blast. Too bad you weren't here THIS year to send UT and OU out with L's.

Don’t pretend KU or CU wouldn’t be gone the first minute a BIG offer materializes. Until then, the Conference USA, erm, Big12 will be a pit, erm truck stop.
 
On SDSU/SMU-I would give the Pac 12 schools a month. If they continue to dither (which I expect), I'd honestly add those two if I'm BY. Add them, and the last get out of jail free card Kliavkoff and co. can now play gets taken away from them.

I don't see how SDSU is a realistic candidate for any conference now their exit fee from the MWC has gone up to $34 million.
 
Usually I'd be in favor, but after I ride share a SmartCar back from my weekly Covid booster shot followed by nude yoga and THC massage and finish fulfilling my sacred trust as a pet guardian to a rescue of mixed parentage, my holistic life coach & spirit guide recommends that I hydrate and load up on pH balanced rain water with live probiotics along with a light superfood meal of açaí and Goji berries over quinoa gently dusted with Ka'Chava then relax by slipping into natural fiber, coexist PJs from a business I found that donates all its profits to Planned Parenthood and The Trevor Project while doing some light reading of The New Yorker under an environmentally conscious mood light to the sweet sound of a humpback whale soundtrack that donates to Greenpeace and PETA.

You know. Typical Thursday.

Could we make it Saturday? That's my cheat day and a grige or three sounds marvelous. It needs to be organic and locally sourced, of course. And I'll eat just about anything vegan and gluten free, so I'm easy.

You eat carbs? Fascist.
 
My favorite part of this move is not having read or hear about “the PAC (in all caps)” like it’s a gawdam acronym. Of all the peeves in my life, this is probably the biggest.
I believe it was “unofficially“ known as the Pacific Athletic Conference in the 60’s which likely is the reason it is sometimes spelled in all caps.
 
Tripling down on media deal first before expansion. A media deal. With 9 schools. Has any conference successfully tried that before? Crazy.
It's not really their plan, cause they have no plan. But they got to say something. Lol
 
I’m almost positive they’ve released this exact statement word for word in the past besides the Colorado part

Homework for ya: find the same statement that the P12 made when USC & UCLA got invited to the B1G.
 
The things that jumped out at me today from the talking points include: the mention and focus on time zones. The mention of fox and espn as brands and their linear reach.
This stood out to me too.

I think it all was about getting more exposure for Shedeur for his Heisman run in 2024.
 
It still amazes me how much GK bungled this whole thing and the P12 presidents & chancellors nodded their approval repeatedly.

Any word on an new chancellor for CU? PD still needs to get pink slipped for this too.
 
Back
Top