Location. Location. Location.No. Hence my question. Maryland football does nothing to move the needle, nationally.
Location. Location. Location.No. Hence my question. Maryland football does nothing to move the needle, nationally.
Blame cu!
You are doing an awesome job of hiding your sexual dysfunction. Keep up the good work!Hey you little punk! You are so weak you have to bad mouth me on someone else’s post! Grow up and be a man. You 2 yr old!
Rutgers? Northwestern? Location mattered once upon a time. It's not going to be a major factor if/when these conferences (the networks) decide to trim the fat.Location. Location. Location.
Look out kNU.Rutgers? Northwestern? Location mattered once upon a time. It's not going to be a major factor if/when these conferences (the networks) decide to trim the fat.
Thanks to our past success in the big 8 and then 2001 in Big 12, we got into the PAC 12. We didn’t really earn a P5 spot based on recent performance. It’s now time for coach prime to elevate us and brings us new success. He’s going to turn us into a real football program again.We've been that since Mac retired. The school doesn't want to do what it takes to be first class, at least not on a regular basis. It’s all been talk for at least 20 years.
Once it doesn't matter (in-market carriage rates for BTN), they'll adjust and adapt. But I don't think we can look at the success of the B1G since it decided to expand from 11 members and say, "wow did they fvck that up." And that seems to be the hill you're on.Rutgers? Northwestern? Location mattered once upon a time. It's not going to be a major factor if/when these conferences (the networks) decide to trim the fat.
I'm not saying that CU didn't handle it well. RG did great, bringing his career record to 2-5,478,346 and for that he should be commended. But I don't get the people celebrating this. This sucks overall - not only for CU but all of college sports. But I think there are some people on here who'd rather be "right" than have their school be successful. So yay?
Oh no, I believe they made the right decisions based on the revenue model at the time. My entire point in responding to you about Maryland is that the reasons you listed are why they were added years ago, not why the networks would want to keep them in 2030 and beyond.Once it doesn't matter (in-market carriage rates for BTN), they'll adjust and adapt. But I don't think we can look at the success of the B1G since it decided to expand from 11 members and say, "wow did they fvck that up." And that seems to be the hill you're on.
Because CU has officially accepted second class citizenship in college football. Signed, sealed and delivered.
This isn't about what they could have done different. It is about the fact CU's fate is sealed. B12 will eventually be third in a two horse race. Maybe CU couldn't have done anything better, doesn't mean it is any more palatable.
If accurate. Awesome. Get ****ed Utah.FWIW...
This from a TCU 'insider' who called CU to the Big12 the Sunday before they left.
Just saw the number offered to ASU and Utah $25MM and a three year ramp to full shares. No funds for brand changes or travel offsets. Full share of post-season and tourney $.
Working to see if they have been given a hard deadline. I can 100% assure you if they miss it, they're out. Yormark isn't messing around.
Oh no, I believe they made the right decisions based on the revenue model at the time. My entire point in responding to you about Maryland is that the reasons you listed are why they were added years ago, not why the networks would want to keep them in 2030 and beyond.
I think there are 5-6 programs in the B1G that FOX, NBC and CBS couldn't give two ****s about and would rather not be paying $70m/year for, just like there are 2-3 in the SEC that ESPN doesn't care about. The networks are clearly running CFB now, and if FOX and ESPN want to remain in the live CFB business, I don't see how there aren't directives to drop many of these programs and replace them with better brands.
Maybe this would have ended differently if they had decided to care about football and demonstrated live more than 8 months ago. We still have a lot to prove, which I think we will but as of now, this was as good as it gets with us being a 1-11 loser last year and for the last 20 plus years. Not a bad outcome considering in all honesty.
I think the eventual media revenue model will be what the Pac-10 was just presented:Oh no, I believe they made the right decisions based on the revenue model at the time. My entire point in responding to you about Maryland is that the reasons you listed are why they were added years ago, not why the networks would want to keep them in 2030 and beyond.
I think there are 5-6 programs in the B1G that FOX, NBC and CBS couldn't give two ****s about and would rather not be paying $70m/year for, just like there are 2-3 in the SEC that ESPN doesn't care about. The networks are clearly running CFB now, and if FOX and ESPN want to remain in the live CFB business, I don't see how there aren't directives to drop many of these programs and replace them with better brands.
Maybe this would have ended differently if they had decided to care about football and demonstrated live more than 8 months ago. We still have a lot to prove, which I think we will but as of now, this was as good as it gets with us being a 1-11 loser last year and for the last 20 plus years. Not a bad outcome considering in all honesty.
I think there’s a lot of truth to this.
I'm going to agree and disagree with you-Realignment has been a disaster for college sports. I mean think back to the 2010-11 moves-I'm not saying that CU didn't handle it well. RG did great, bringing his career record to 2-5,478,346 and for that he should be commended. But I don't get the people celebrating this. This sucks overall - not only for CU but all of college sports. But I think there are some people on here who'd rather be "right" than have their school be successful. So yay?
I think the eventual media revenue model will be what the Pac-10 was just presented:
1. Lower base rate than the schools are used to.
2. Escalator for subscription milestones.
3. Unequal sharing based on who gets selected for prime tile slots, gets ratings and advances to/through post-season.
What do you think is the end game? Do the SEC and B1G survive as conferences or do the big schools just go and do their own thing outside the NCAA and current conference structure? And how man schools do you see being on that boat?
I do not disagree. This has been 22 years in the making and I'm just sad that this day is finally here.