ahoelsken
Well-Known Member
Stanford fans (all 5 of them) want nothing to do with Fred's ****ty grammar.No joke I want nothing to do w Stanford or cal. They can go away with dead fishes. Or st and wash st are a different matter.
Stanford fans (all 5 of them) want nothing to do with Fred's ****ty grammar.No joke I want nothing to do w Stanford or cal. They can go away with dead fishes. Or st and wash st are a different matter.
I don't know how to screen shot the above and draw a red marker on your post..... But NO.... you got a lot wrong on the post above.Btw did I get all the punctuation and phrases correct For all you English majors? I hope not!
Cool could you edit! If you have nothing better to do.I don't know how to screen shot the above and draw a red marker on your post..... But NO.... you got a lot wrong on the post above.
I am not the English major that you seek.Cool could you edit! If you have nothing better to do.
How's that working out for her?
Except for UNLV of course!We do that, Big 12 should be done in the West for the next 5 years.
UNLV has 5 years to draw over 35k per game in that stadium while winning 8 games per year and becoming an annual Dance team.Except for UNLV of course!
Big12 basketball games will be insane.We do that, Big 12 should be done in the West for the next 5 years.
I know it is lower population too but just cant figure why New Mexico as a state cannot filed 1 P5 quality team. Idaho is closer but in the same low pop not quite there category. Yes I know it is mostly population but Nebraska is lower and 1 other with a decent p5 team but cannot remember.UNLV has 5 years to draw over 35k per game in that stadium while winning 8 games per year and becoming an annual Dance team.
Fresno State needs to do a massive facilities project and keep winning.
Boise State needs ID to add a million people to its population while averaging 10+ wins a year.
No one else worth mentioning.
ooh NCSU would be a good Big 12 fit IMO. Of the rest of those....Louisville maybe? Can't see Duke as a fit. VT either.Noooooo thank you. Bridge the gap to the east with ACC schools. Those two others just seem way too weak to take right now, no reason to do that. Take 4 ACC schools so our footprint is stronger in the southeast and we’ll be set
Pitt, Louisville, VT, NCSU, Duke (squeakyshoe conf), and Miami (if they don’t get an invite to SEC/B1G) are all better adds that are worth waiting for.
Can’t purge teams like UCF/Cinci so we should definitely stand pat without more junk
I just don't see what SDSU and Oregon State bring. Households and market size are not going to be as relevant in 2031 when seeking a new media deal and nobody is tuning into SDSU football. Hoops would be the only reason to add them, but they are so dilutive everywhere else. Oregon State adds no appeal either. I would hate for ESPN to force the issue so they have true PTZ content, even if at partial share as that doesn't increase anything for the rest, only to saddle the conference with those schools in 7 years.Noooooo thank you. Bridge the gap to the east with ACC schools. Those two others just seem way too weak to take right now, no reason to do that. Take 4 ACC schools so our footprint is stronger in the southeast and we’ll be set
Pitt, Louisville, VT, NCSU, Duke (squeakyshoe conf), and Miami (if they don’t get an invite to SEC/B1G) are all better adds that are worth waiting for.
Can’t purge teams like UCF/Cinci so we should definitely stand pat without more junk
Time zone adds value with media partners because of late time slots.I just don't see what SDSU and Oregon State bring. Households and market size are not going to be as relevant in 2031 when seeking a new media deal and nobody is tuning into SDSU football. Hoops would be the only reason to add them, but they are so dilutive everywhere else. Oregon State adds no appeal either. I would hate for ESPN to force the issue so they have true PTZ content, even if at partial share as that doesn't increase anything for the rest, only to saddle the conference with those schools in 7 years.
Unless the demise of the ACC is imminent, I'd rather the conference stay at 16.
This. Those teams will always be available, let’s see how the ACC shakes out.Noooooo thank you. Bridge the gap to the east with ACC schools. Those two others just seem way too weak to take right now, no reason to do that. Take 4 ACC schools so our footprint is stronger in the southeast and we’ll be set
Pitt, Louisville, VT, NCSU, Duke (squeakyshoe conf), and Miami (if they don’t get an invite to SEC/B1G) are all better adds that are worth waiting for.
Can’t purge teams like UCF/Cinci so we should definitely stand pat without more junk
Big 12 After Dark !Time zone adds value with media partners because of late time slots.
I’ve seen quite a few stories on cnn.Just my observation, but I perceive there's been a dearth of coverage of the past week's realignment by the MSM, who usually report significant sports stories. CNN and MSNBC have had nothing I've seen.
Looks like just sports dedicated media is covering this, to me.
He’s been too busyI sure wish that @liverflukes would drop by. Would love to get his perspective on all of this.
if you are traditionally a power program and you aren't currently in the big or sec, you are most concerned with being ready to elevate in 5 years when everything blows up again.
if you are a g5 who has just moved into a power conference or you desire to do, then you are spending the next 5 years trying to prove you are competitive and building out the necessary minimum infrastructure and such.
the next round will make this one look like sunday bingo.