or p for k it schoolyard styleAfter seeing the punt team's performance, I think we should follow that high school team's idea and never punt again. Go for it on fourth down. Every time.
Well, what did they say?I'm not happy with the loss, particularly when you consider how the team played in the 1st quarter.
The 2 questions I have going forward are, how do they respond after this loss, and how mentally tough are they after losing 2 (maybe 3) key players to injury?
One surprize? The local radio, which is typically 90% sooner/cowboy talk, said something reasonable this morning about the Buffs game against meatchicken. I almost drove into the ditch.
Well, what did they say?
Yes...and no.
CU is coming out of the OOC with the best possible position, at least that anybody expected, 2-1. Staying within 17 of the #4 team on the road isn't too shabby.
As others I am sure have observed, the game was there for the taking, but CU made too many mistakes. I am looking at you punt team, and unnamed person(s) responsible for coaching that abortion of a punt formation.
I still think the max number of W's is five. Sorry, but that is how I see it. CU is too thin talent wise, lack of quality depth and the OL still limit this team. They are improving and I will root them on, but I have a hard time coming up with more than 3 P12 wins.
This appears to be the worst looking PAC-12 in years! I would lump Stanford and UDub together as really good and then ucla, Utah, USC, both zona schools, CU, Cal, Oregon and wash st as middle of the road programs who could beat or lose to any of the other mentioned on any given day.
I think the PAC is the worst P5 conference this season based off what I've seen. Colorado will and should win 4-5 conference games.
This appears to be the worst looking PAC-12 in years! I would lump Stanford and UDub together as really good and then ucla, Utah, USC, both zona schools, CU, Cal, Oregon and wash st as middle of the road programs who could beat or lose to any of the other mentioned on any given day.
I think the PAC is the worst P5 conference this season based off what I've seen. Colorado will and should win 4-5 conference games.
Big12 says hi.
Going into this weekend, UT was pretty much unanimously viewed as the best team in the conference, and they went out and lost to Cal.I'm not so sure the PAC is better than them.
I hope you are right. I think OSU is as close to a conference gimme as there is. ASU, UA, WSU are the other teams on CU's schedule that are vulnerable. Stanford, USC, UCLA, are much more difficult games. Utah? Who knows. A lot is riding on this Oregon game. If CU can pull the upset, that would be huge and probably mean I am all wet. We'll see. Fact is, while CU is improved, and the some of the rest of the conference is down, going from 2 conference wins in three years to 4-5 in a single year is a quantum leap.This appears to be the worst looking PAC-12 in years! I would lump Stanford and UDub together as really good and then ucla, Utah, USC, both zona schools, CU, Cal, Oregon and wash st as middle of the road programs who could beat or lose to any of the other mentioned on any given day.
I think the PAC is the worst P5 conference this season based off what I've seen. Colorado will and should win 4-5 conference games.
The ACC says hello as well. With FSU getting exposed as a pretender, that conference is 2 teams and not much else.
I hope you are right. I think OSU is as close to a conference gimme as there is. ASU, UA, WSU are the other teams on CU's schedule that are vulnerable. Stanford, USC, UCLA, are much more difficult games. Utah? Who knows. A lot is riding on this Oregon game. If CU can pull the upset, that would be huge and probably mean I am all wet. We'll see. Fact is, while CU is improved, and the some of the rest of the conference is down, going from 2 conference wins in three years to 4-5 in a single year is a quantum leap.
USC is the most talented team in the south, but softI hope you are right. I think OSU is as close to a conference gimme as there is. ASU, UA, WSU are the other teams on CU's schedule that are vulnerable. Stanford, USC, UCLA, are much more difficult games. Utah? Who knows. A lot is riding on this Oregon game. If CU can pull the upset, that would be huge and probably mean I am all wet. We'll see. Fact is, while CU is improved, and the some of the rest of the conference is down, going from 2 conference wins in three years to 4-5 in a single year is a quantum leap.
We play SC in LA. When is the last time CU went in there and won? Do you really think CU stacks up talent wise? At any position? I hate to be the wet blanket, but CU will have to play a lights out in the Collisseum to beat even a pedestrian SC team.I'm not so sure about putting USC in the more difficult group. Adversity isn't really their thing.
Wow. OK, I hope you are right. I will sit down to a big old plate of crow with a smile on my face if you are. In the meantime, pass the bong....USC is the most talented team in the south, but soft
UCLA is probably the best overall team in the south
UofA doesn't function is Solomon is not healthy (sound familiar?) and they have no defense
ASU defense is bad. Like really bad. Like wet paper bag, bad.
UU is defensively very tough, but there offense is lethargic.
If Sefo is healthy, CU it isn't out of the realm of possibility to say CU could win the South. The Oregon game is huge. Win that game and the path to the post season gets much easier.
I mean it wouldn't be pretty. I don't see us going 5-0 in the south, but we could go 3-2 or maybe 4-1 and win it because the other teams aren't great either.Wow. OK, I hope you are right. I will sit down to a big old plate of crow with a smile on my face if you are. In the meantime, pass the bong....
Like I said, nobody would be happier to be wrong than me to get that outcome, ugly or not.I mean it wouldn't be pretty. I don't see us going 5-0 in the south, but we could go 3-2 or maybe 4-2 and win it because the other teams aren't great either.
This.Lost. Unhappy.
Parts of the performance confirmed for me what the team is capable of, so I feel 100% justified in being upset at any loss and pissing on any suggestion of a "moral victory".
To Skiddy's point from yesterday. "Legitimacy" is one of the possible narratives. However, unless you saw the first half, that message wasn't delivered.
The sports channels framed the game as a top ten team whoopin' ass on the hapless Buffs. No mention of a scare delivered by the offense, or a defense that largely stymied a top team. Nope, it was portrayed as a recruiting video for Michigan and, seriously, an anti-recruiting video for CU.
Certainly there is some truth to this... But we should have tiers of unhappiness to distinguish how we feel today, from how we felt, say, after Fresno State hung 69 on us at home... Or when we got beat by a division II school for the second time. I don't think it's fair to this team to just say, "I am unhappy with a loss." We are all unhappy with the loss - but this has got to be about the most palatable loss I can recall in the last few years.Lost. Unhappy.
Parts of the performance confirmed for me what the team is capable of, so I feel 100% justified in being upset at any loss and pissing on any suggestion of a "moral victory".
Good points here. The Buffs' receivers burned Michigan's secondary numerous times. But once Montez went in, our O-line just crumbled. He and Gehrke (who was in for one play) went 0-8 passing for the rest of the game. In other words, after Sefo left, the Buffs didn't complete another pass. It didn't even matter how open our guys potentially were. Montez had no time to throw.Unhappy with the punt team's performance. Unhappy with overall LB performance.
Ecstatic about the rest.
Depth at a lot of positions is not even close to adequate.
Cu > Michigan at: QB, WR, DB
CU = Michigan at: OL, DL
CU < Michigan at: RB, TE, LB
CU <<<< Michigan at: Special Teams
Certainly there is some truth to this... But we should have tiers of unhappiness to distinguish how we feel today, from how we felt, say, after Fresno State hung 69 on us at home... Or when we got beat by a division II school for the second time. I don't think it's fair to this team to just say, "I am unhappy with a loss." We are all unhappy with the loss - but this has got to be about the most palatable loss I can recall in the last few years.