Yellow Shirt
Club Member
And simplistic. But is it incorrect?This is very very silly.
And simplistic. But is it incorrect?This is very very silly.
Yes, as has been explained to you ad nauseum. What is hilarious is that by refusing to switch, you are the problem. Not Scott, not even DTV.And simplistic. But is it incorrect?
This is also in the article, which is basically what it comes down to and I don't see this changing unless DTV loses exclusivity on Sunday Ticket or the Pac-12 decides it wants to market the conference better:
Yes, as has been explained to you ad nauseum. What is hilarious is that by refusing to switch, you are the problem. Not Scott, not even DTV.
I tried switching. I was with Comcast for five months. They managed to piss off my family and me so much that I could never go back. Just yesterday, we're watching TV and an ad for Xfinity comes on. Both my wife and daughter chime in and say "Please, don't EVER do that to us again".
If Comcast didn't suck so bad (TV service only, I won't deny their internet service is fantastic), they would have kept me as a customer. As it stands, it was worth more to me to have a happy family than to stick it to DTV.
I still think the best weapon to use is to find bars that don't carry the P12 network and put the pressure on them. DTV doesn't give a damn what I do, but they might care if Old Chicagos calls them up and tells them they need to carry the P12 network because it's causing Old Chicago to lose customers.
That said, I don't blame DirecTV. They've got their own numbers they're looking at. They've got the NFL negotiations coming up. They'll need a war chest for that if they want to have a prayer of re-upping as the exclusive supplier of Sunday Ticket. And they have to be positioned to base their business model on something other than sports programming if they can't get the Sunday Ticket deal done. As part of this, they're also looking at ESPN charging exorbitant fees, forcing networks like LHN on carriers, competition coming at ESPN from Fox, CBS and NBC, and serious questions of whether the law of diminishing returns has reduced the value for all sports network carriage. DirecTV's main competitor, Dish, is currently battling ESPN for this reason.
And, of course, google and others are coming hard with digital stream programming that may completely change the landscape and could cause these carriers to be caught with their pants down if they're locked into rich long-term deals when the world shifts.
I don't fault Larry Scott. His valuation of PACN has been justified and confirmed by other carriers.
I don't fault DirecTV. They're in a state of flux with their business model and future.
Would you stay if the bill went to $150 monthly to include p12n?
I would say any increase to their subscriber fee and blaming it on the cost for the PAC N at best is disingenuous. Don't they already charge a sports subsidy fee? The PAC N is asking for ~80 cents in foot print and ~10 cents outside. For their subscriber base - wild guess probably ~25 cents a month average?
@CUFan, that won't happen. Choice is not profitable.
I would gladly pay a few extra bucks for Pac12 on my bill if DirecTV added it. The NFL Sunday Ticket isn't all that appealing to me, 98% of the games I would never watch. All Bronco games are already on and I have no desire to pay for 16 Jaguar, Titan, or Viking games. I've had ST and Redzone at different points in the past and found myself watching Redzone much more often and can get that on the other carriers.
I would gladly pay a few extra bucks for Pac12 on my bill if DirecTV added it. The NFL Sunday Ticket isn't all that appealing to me, 98% of the games I would never watch. All Bronco games are already on and I have no desire to pay for 16 Jaguar, Titan, or Viking games. I've had ST and Redzone at different points in the past and found myself watching Redzone much more often and can get that on the other carriers.
For those with comcast limited basic you can add the sports package now. You don't have to get the full package and can stream it online.
They won't do it because it would be a much better deal than their current providers have. I think they'd be a wee bit pissed if DirecTV received a sweetheart deal.Same here if the 2 sides would agree to it. From what I understand P12 isn't agreeing to this model for some reason. Thought I've read that P12N wants DTV to add their network with no added cost to the customers.
I can identify 400 channels I'd trade in for the PAC 12 Network.All this talk about the a la carte dream.
Hell, I'd be happy if I could just re-set my channel order so that it made sense.
Why can't all the ESPNs, FoxSports, CBSsports, NBCsports, Root, Big 10 Network, Pac-12 Network, etc. all be next to each other?
What about Discovery, Science, Nat Geo, History, History2, etc.?
When I've got 400 ****ing channels, it would be nice if they were at least arranged in some semblance of order.
Thanks for letting me know. I checked on this in the past and it wasn't an option for me with the dual package thing. I'll have to check again now.