Are you saying get rid of him too or hire some kind of ****ing search committee?Once this staff inevitably gets fired, RG cannot be entrusted to hire the next football coach under circumstances.
yesAre you saying get rid of him too or hire some kind of ****ing search committee?
It would be zero difference. Everyone gets paid unless they quit. The assistant head coach (Phil McG) takes over and at least the players like him.Keep in mind that if we fire KD right now most of the staff stays on through the end of the year and the interm coach is probably on that staff.
This means that the financial difference between firing now or at the end of the season is minimal.
Prez has to give RG a war chest and an ultimatum that he wants a champion program & will make sure some basic changes are made so that CU is on a level playing field with peer institutions on admitting athletes. I actually trust RG to deliver if that's the job description and he has resources.Hell no on a search committee.
...
The defense is what I feared it would be. The excuses of "the D being on the field too long" were always a cover for Chris Wilson's ineptitude to make adjustments.
That was on full display vs TCU. Teams have won championships aplenty with great Ds and no help from the offense (Broncos 2016 for instance). Nobody was saying that defense wore down and thus gave up 50 each week because....
...
I agree. I know we used one before. I don't remember for which coach though. It didn't end well.Hell no on a search committee.
KD isn't going anywhere until his contract is up...CU doesn't care about football and they sure as hell aren't going to buy out KD's contract before it's up. Everyone needs to realize this program is dead, and move on.Here’s the question for me. We can all say 1-11, 2-10 gets KD fired because ppl won’t show up to games, loss revenue …etc but when was the last time, if ever, we were facing this situation with a $7.5m + assistants ($9-10m?) buyout in front of us? I feel like this is uncharted territory for CU.
I’m just not confident the AD can come up with that kind of cash and we may be forced to keep this loser coach and hope “young” guys get better next year or any other canned BS excuse.
As currently constructed - yes. The program is dead and nobody at CU cares. That attitude has to change before any other changes can be made. Otherwise, we are just hoping to find the next Bill McCartney. That strategy has proven to be disastrous as we slide further and further down the path to irrelevancy.KD isn't going anywhere until his contract is up...CU doesn't care about football and they sure as hell aren't going to buy out KD's contract before it's up. Everyone needs to realize this program is dead, and move on.
I think we passed irrelevancy a few years ago...and the sad thing is I don't think we've hit rock bottom. Wait until OCT/NOV roll around and you have 20K fans at Folsom and a recruiting class (that already sucks)that is down to a handful of kids still committed because they have no other offers.As currently constructed - yes. The program is dead and nobody at CU cares. That attitude has to change before any other changes can be made. Otherwise, we are just hoping to find the next Bill McCartney. That strategy has proven to be disastrous as we slide further and further down the path to irrelevancy.
I mostly agree, but I think it depends on how you define “irrelevant”. Are we irrelevant in the national championship discussion? Yes, no doubt about it. We are irrelevant in many ways, but we are still a P5 program (for the time being) that is regularly shown on television. There are degrees of irrelevance we still can reach and we appear to be doing everything we can to reach them.I think we passed irrelevancy a few years ago...and the sad thing is I don't think we've hit rock bottom. Wait until OCT/NOV roll around and you have 20K fans at Folsom and a recruiting class (that already sucks)that is down to a handful of kids still committed because they have no other offers.
Where do you see two wins ?If we lose big on Saturday (as expected), 2-10 looks like a best case scenario.
The decision to fire Dorrell would actually be pretty straightforward and easy at that point.
It ultimately stops with Saliman now. He has the power to make the AD whatever he wants, and if dio is right that Phil is retiring at the end of the school year, Saliman can go ahead and make the decisions, while making sure the new Chancellor has a vision and mandate that's aligned with having a strong AD.A new coach, while absolutely necessary, will still have the same set of institutional constraints. As much as it hurts, I believe we need to get the Chancellor in place first, then the AD. Clean slate from top to bottom and in that order. Hiring a new HC and then hiring his boss a year later will be problematic.
I am saying that the University President needs to hire a new, visionary Athletic Director who will then be empowered to hire the next Head Football Coach.Are you saying get rid of him too or hire some kind of ****ing search committee?
I definitely thought Lewis' poor play last year was mostly due to poor coordination and QB coaching, but after one game this year where he looked pretty much the exact same, including a Tim Tebow dirt ball to wide open Fontenot 7 yards away, I now believe it is/was equally an issue between coaching and Lewis just not being a good QB.We need a young and hungry offensive innovator in a bad way.
Even if we keep losing due to talent, we desperately need an offense that can at least provide an exciting game for fans.
I’ve never been an air raid guy, but I honestly think it might be best for us now. We won’t win the big games but it would give us fireworks with limited talent and help us be a decent bowl team
Amen. A new HC won't do. We will be circling the toilet for another HC cycle. RG may be competent, I don't know. Hiring MT was a bold and solid move. But, he couldn't keep him. That is most likely because of the inept way the administration runs things up there. Whatever latitude I may have wanted to give RG went out the window, not for hiring a complete bust of a coach in KD, but making him the highest paid HC at UC ever, with a fully guaranteed contract to boot. I don't want anybody that clueless at the helm. Lance Carl, Phil D, they all need to go yesterday. Unless and until there is a real commitment to being competitive from the top down, this sad cycle will continue.A new coach, while absolutely necessary, will still have the same set of institutional constraints. As much as it hurts, I believe we need to get the Chancellor in place first, then the AD. Clean slate from top to bottom and in that order. Hiring a new HC and then hiring his boss a year later will be problematic.
Right! Rick and Lance can hit the road again! I'm sure they'll think of someone!Hell no on a search committee.
Vance Joseph is gonna lock down the #boxstate in 2023! Our practices will get even better than they are now!
Agreed. Need remove oversight of the AD from the regents as well. Too many of them use athletics as a bogeyman to score easy political points...The AD needs to report directly to the President.
Athletics should not be managed by the guy that is responsible for academics.
No way I’d want Phil around when the new hire is made. I might include RG as well unless we can be sure he is not on back meds when making contract negotiations.A new coach, while absolutely necessary, will still have the same set of institutional constraints. As much as it hurts, I believe we need to get the Chancellor in place first, then the AD. Clean slate from top to bottom and in that order. Hiring a new HC and then hiring his boss a year later will be problematic.
I feel the same way. But then, when I start contemplating it, the problems go much deeper than RG. The two biggest factors to me are funding and recruiting restrictions.I am saying that the University President needs to hire a new, visionary Athletic Director who will then be empowered to hire the next Head Football Coach.