Shilo and Bentley were awful and exposed per usual on that drive. Interesting how they both look for big hits but are routinely out of position and cost the team points
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
Game Thread: Cincy @ CU—October 26 @ 8:15 PM ESPN
- Thread starter FM-Buff
- Start date
Medford M.
Well-Known Member
Give him the business, Travis!
Neither of the big plays were on either of them.
TD play was well designed by UC knowing CU runs man, not going to win that in man.
Long wheel route was either Hodge or Craig not picking the RB up.
And 12 was just yelling at him on camera.
Birch1
Well-Known Member
Just Shilo's on that last play
Medford M.
Well-Known Member
Bentley didn't have any issues, aside from the ref getting in his way.
Bad angle by Shilo.
Wrong
2 Brilliant Man Beaters, no doubt that was coaching and not Shilo
There should have been a CALL for that moment, like a "Fire, Fire" or something to quickly do a handoff from inside out
Medford M.
Well-Known Member
It was literally his man. Did you see that **** route he took in coverage?
Bentley is consistently in position. He shouldn’t ever be in 1 on 1 coverage with anyone. If he is, that’s a scheme/play call issue. Not sure what you’re talking about
And not covering a RB who went for 30 yards because he was diving into the C instead of covering the wide open RB
Route is typically ran to the pile on
The real problem on that drive was the second play, RB was hit in the backfield on 2nd and 10 but got like 10 yards after breaking the tackle. Completely changed the complexion of the drive.
LB's is responsible for covering the RB coming out of the backfired. Bentley has zero interest in that. He runs straight into the C/G gap hoping to get lucky lucky and hit a rb in the backfired. He guesses not reads and often is out of position.
Birch1
Well-Known Member
They even ran that touchdown away from Travis. Picking us apart, going for weak link.
5 almost broke that
I still don't know how he broke that tackle? Looks like he might've been injured on that play.
Medford M.
Well-Known Member
Jimmy feeling it tonight
Jimmy is looking really really freaking fast
NFL eyeballs gotta be on him
NFL eyeballs gotta be on him
lol. He’s been beaten two times all year on significant gains by the RB. And again I say, he is too slow to be in 1 on 1 with a running back. That is a scheme/play call issue. Safety can absolutely be man on with the RB
Medford M.
Well-Known Member
Yeah because you know our scheme and assignments
Heard multiple times that our pitch to Juju is that he will get to play in our "Air Raid" offense, with wide open sets, just like having 5 wide there
We must plan on getting the best of the best OL to do that
We must plan on getting the best of the best OL to do that
Great job getting in the way and not picking up a blindside block by 12. Announcer just said that. Glad he gave credit.
Wow weak rtp