They are also guaranteed a game in CA every year with USC and UCLA. I dont see what Stanford brings eitherThey’ve never been in the same conference and play each other every year - again I don’t see any benefit to ND dragging Stanford anywhere.
They are also guaranteed a game in CA every year with USC and UCLA. I dont see what Stanford brings eitherThey’ve never been in the same conference and play each other every year - again I don’t see any benefit to ND dragging Stanford anywhere.
If Stanford gets an invite I will be so confused about what the big 10 wants lol.They are also guaranteed a game in CA every year with USC and UCLA. I dont see what Stanford brings either
I also don't discount the possibility of a western conference for everything but football and football being independents with a scheduling alliance (like the old eastern independents when the Big East first formed). Of course, that crashed and burned.
And let’s be honest, how important is that Stanford game to ND anyway? Do Irish fans circle that date on the calendar? Stanford fans (such as they are) sure don’t.They are also guaranteed a game in CA every year with USC and UCLA. I dont see what Stanford brings either
They are also guaranteed a game in CA every year with USC and UCLA. I dont see what Stanford brings either
When speaking to ND fans, USC is their football rival.And let’s be honest, how important is that Stanford game to ND anyway? Do Irish fans circle that date on the calendar? Stanford fans (such as they are) sure don’t.
Michigan and Notre Dame, however, should play every single year. I don’t understand why that annual series ended. I know they’ve played a couple recently, but I looked forward to watching that game every year.
Good because those teams would be guaranteed to never be on TV when they play in their grassy **** tundra of nothingnessThere won’t be divisions
So ND would get a guaranteed game in California every year. Plus they could uphold their bull**** fake image of only playing "elite academic" institutions
They’ve never been in the same conference and play each other every year - again I don’t see any benefit to ND dragging Stanford anywhere.
Not sure what any of that has to do with ND wanting Stanford in the BIG.They seem to have some kind of a footprint there in the Bay Area.
Copyright © 2022 University of Notre Dame
Notre Dame California Palo Alto, CA 94303 calif@nd.edu
Accessibility Information
Home // Notre Dame California // University of Notre Dame
Notre Dame California connects the University’s faculty and students to opportunities on the West Coast and builds a bridge back to our Indiana campus for Notre Dame alumni and friends.california.nd.edu
Alumni Network // Notre Dame California // University of Notre Dame
Notre Dame California connects the University’s faculty and students to opportunities on the West Coast and builds a bridge back to our Indiana campus for Notre Dame alumni and friends.california.nd.edu
Notre Dame Alumni Clubs in California // Notre Dame California // University of Notre Dame
Notre Dame California connects the University’s faculty and students to opportunities on the West Coast and builds a bridge back to our Indiana campus for Notre Dame alumni and friends.california.nd.edu
Because Stanford is in the Bay Area and they’d probably make that a demand that they played once in the Bay Area and once in LA every year. I would if I was drawing alums and new students from there.Not sure what any of that has to do with ND wanting Stanford in the BIG.
They don’t need Stanford to be in the BIG to play them, they aren’t in the same conference now and play every year. This idea that somehow ND would insist on Stanford joins them in the BIG is nonsense.Because Stanford is in the Bay Area and they’d probably make that a demand that they played once in the Bay Area and once in LA every year. I would if I was drawing alums and new students from there.
When speaking to ND fans, USC is their football rival.
Michigan, Michigan State, Stanford, Purdue, Boston College and Navy are all in that next category of traditional rivals but not as important as an "every year" opponent.
They like that they mix it up and also have history with programs like Texas, Miami, Penn State, etc.
True. ND most likely isnt gonna join anyways.They don’t need Stanford to be in the BIG to play them, they aren’t in the same conference now and play every year. This idea that somehow ND would insist on Stanford joins them in the BIG is nonsense.
I've been thinking way too much about this.
Here's a first stab at it
Pac-12 selections:
1. Washington
2. Oregon
3. Stanford
4. Cal
5. Arizona
6. Arizona State
7. Utah
8. Colorado
Locks down all footprint states while doubling down in the huge Bay Area media market and the AZ market which is growing like nowhere else but GA. I take UA, not just ASU, due to the name brand (even it's mostly in hoops) because this conference needs cache. WSU & OSU get left behind because they don't add markets or prestige.
Big 12 selections:
1. Baylor
2. Houston
3. TCU
4. Texas Tech
5. Oklahoma State
6. Kansas
7. BYU
8. Iowa State
Ideally, Cinci, UCF, and Houston wouldn't be joining the Big 12 but I don't see that ending without a major legal battle, something the new conference won't want to deal with. Stanford and Cal to the Big 10 would be best for CU. Neither of those schools give a crap about football and that would leave room for Oregon State and Washington State and the Big 12 as is plus the four new members, a 20-team conference. WSU's fb revenue is similar to Stanford's and Cal's football revenue is less than OSU. Lol, Cal might as well be funded by their swimming and diving team. What's best for CU would be WSU and OSU, not Cal Stanford.No way in hell Stanford doesn't go to the B1G, they are one of the premier research institutions in the world. No way they're staying in a conference with a bunch of dregs. They'll have no part of a new garbage PAC/Big 12 merger.
Stanford is far worse in that regard ^^This is about TV money. Stanford is no better than Northwestern in that regard.
Wrong.Maybe they can research how to add $70m+ per year to the B1G.
The only way they get in is if ND drags them in.
The games that I’ve watched being played at the Rose Bowl have been pretty bare as well.Those empty seats at Stanford football games will be my lasting memory of the PAC.
The Rose Bowl, for all its history, is a pretty terrible college football stadium outside the Bowl game. It’s almost 30 miles from UCLA’s campus so it’s an effort to get people there. It’s about as far from campus as Empower Field is from Boulder.The games that I’ve watched being played at the Rose Bowl have been pretty bare as well.
That puts it into better perspective for me. I knew it was off campus, but didn’t realize it was that far.The Rose Bowl, for all its history, is a pretty terrible college football stadium outside the Bowl game. It’s almost 30 miles from UCLA’s campus so it’s an effort to get people there. It’s about as far from campus as Empower Field is from Boulder.
About 30 miles from Westwood to Pasadena across LA traffic.That puts it into better perspective for me. I knew it was off campus, but didn’t realize it was that far.
How come Colorado, Utah. Arizona and ASU are meeting today with Big 12?There's no way we'd be in the top 16-20 teams...MWC here we come?
I meant if we were ranking all the teams records etc, we'd be left out. But we do have a fairly large media market and a geographic footprint that makes sense and a history of success my great grandpa remembers...LOL. Of course, geography means nothing anymore...it's about the money...imagine that...How come Colorado, Utah. Arizona and ASU are meeting today with Big 12?
That's the best option for us IMO.
Which set-up would you prefer?
I like the third one.
Which set-up would you prefer?
I like the third one.
A couple thoughts...
Which set-up would you prefer?
I like the third one.