You do realize that Bama's loss was to the team they are playing, right? I mean, right?Than no team with a loss can prove anything in any championship game. Ever. Not much of a trump card.
You do realize that Bama's loss was to the team they are playing, right? I mean, right?Than no team with a loss can prove anything in any championship game. Ever. Not much of a trump card.
TEAM BEATEN | RANK | TEAM LOST TO | RANK | TEAM BEATEN | RANK | TEAM LOST TO | RANK |
Kent State | Louisiana Lafayette | ||||||
@Penn State | 23 | Arizona | |||||
North Texas | @Tulsa | ||||||
Arkansas | 14 | @Texas AM | 8 | ||||
@Florida | 12 | Kansas | |||||
Vandy | @Texas | 22 | |||||
@Ol Miss | @Mizzou | ||||||
Tennessee | Baylor | ||||||
LSU | 1 | Kansas State | 14 | ||||
@Miss State | @Texas Tech | ||||||
Georgia Southern | @Iowa State | ||||||
@Auburn | 24 | ||||||
If Bama had a kicker and had beaten LSU, would you be pimping for an 11-1 LSU to get a rematch?
You do realize that Bama's loss was to the team they are playing, right? I mean, right?
I still would have voted for someone else over Oregon. First game of the year or not, they had their chance, and lost. I would have put Oregon ahead of Bama though based on the fact that LSU beat Bama at Bama's barn.Yes I do. And I realize that lots of championship games in all sports are contested between teams that played each other before, and are won by teams that previously lost. Alabama would destroy OSU if they played. They are just better this year.
Let me ask you this. If Oregon had not **** the bed against USC, and had gone on to beat LSU in the rematch NC game, would they have proven themselves? (This is the scenario I was hoping for, by the way.)
Why do you think I'm arguing? :lol: There has to be some higher purpose in order to get me to agree with Rino.All this argument does is provide more ammo for a NCAA playoff system. The only way that this would truly be settled is if the 6 AQ conference champions along with two wild cards based on highest BCS rank were able to play for the title.
Those were NFL defenses pal. Every starter on Bama's team is going to play in the NFL. We will have 2 taken in the 1st round this year maybe 3. Our goofdick QB is in his first year but I bet he get drafted and sticks in the NFL. Their QB just got out of jail and had not practiced much.
How could such a bad QB get drafted? If your defense is a so called NFL defense then how does sucking against it get him a spot in the NFL against real defenses lol?
This is his first year to start. He just doesn't have the experience yet. He is going to start for three years. He is going to be drafted. He has thrown for almost as many yards this year as our QB last year who got drafted. He doesn't have NFL WRs or OL like Gmac did last year.
By my count, Alabama has more total wins, more wins against ranked teams. It has a win against the highest currently ranked team on this table (Arkansas #8). Also has a much much more acceptable loss. What other category do you guys want?
I see Kellen Moore and Case Keenum going 1-2
This is his first year to start. He just doesn't have the experience yet. He is going to start for three years. He is going to be drafted. He has thrown for almost as many yards this year as our QB last year who got drafted. He doesn't have NFL WRs or OL like Gmac did last year.
You should focus on that other football.
Maybe, but bringing up college stats when you´re talking about a player´s NFL prospects doesn´t convince me as college performance can be largely irrelevant.
I must agree with everyone here who doesn't want to see a rematch of boring bowl. LSU and Bama are 2 freaking great teams. But when they played each other it was one of the most boring games in recent history. In 4 quarters, 12 total points all field goals followed by one more to win it for LSU.
I also agree that until we have a playoff of some kind, the rule should be that you have to have won your own conference in order to play in the national championship game. Heck Bama can't even say they won their own division! What we really need is at least a +1 playoff. How hard would that be. We pit the Top 4 ranked teams (BCS or a better system if possible). #1 against #4; #2 against #3. Winner of each game plays for all the marbles. In that scenario I am OK with a team that doesn't win their conference still winning it all if they had to participate in this +1.
I realize this is not ideal either because it should be more of a real playoff with top 20 teams but that just is not going to happen soon or maybe ever.
Our division has 3 of the top 7 teams in the nation. Your 'fairness' doctrine is for ****ing kickball tournaments in kindergarten.
Bama hasn't proved it on the field, cause they LOST. What is this, some ****ing playground tetherball game where you can call a rematch?
Name me a team that's better.
This is totally different than the Nebraska situation, where it could be argued that there were 3-4 teams more deserving of a shot at the MNC. There isn't a single other team in the country, IMO, that's anywhere close to being as good as Alabama (other than LSU, of course).
The two situations are only similar in that Alabama won't be the conference champion. Totally different in every other way.
Can you not understand the futility of a game that won't determine the national champion, no matter the outcome?Why do so many people have a hard time understanding that the 2 best can actually be in the same conference? So what if they already played. If you don't want to see a rematch then don't watch.
Why do so many people have a hard time understanding that the 2 best can actually be in the same conference? So what if they already played. If you don't want to see a rematch then don't watch.
Can you not understand the futility of a game that won't determine the national champion, no matter the outcome?
I would put up a fight if there was another team actually deserving. Unfortunately their isn't.
You don't think Okie Light would be deserving if they beat OU? Really?