The dude played defensive back.
You’ve still made 0 cases
Go to bed
The dude played defensive back.
You’ve still made 0 cases
Go to bed
Hahahhhahahaha. Grab some bench next to Montez. You’re about as good as he has been
So that makes you Noyer?
Huh? I am Murray running circles around your dumbass
Don’t hate because you are bad at math. 5 out of 130 is a poor percentage.
5 out of 130? Right.
You’re a joke. You’ve totally missed my point, which is that leaders care about both sides of the ball. You want Colorado to emulate teams from the Big12? You don’t want the greatest coach in the history of the sport? Give it a break.
That was never your point. You have added to and changed your argument several times.
You said argue my position in this thread. I have done so. You have yet to present a reason for a defensive coach other than Saban and a few others. That would make them an exception. If you think Lake has “it” to become one of those exceptions then that is your opinion. Current data would not favor your odds of being right.
Best wishes.
Your profile says you joined in 2012 and yet you're surprised allbuffs threads don't remain on topic . . .Need to change thread title to, "Coaching Bizarre." . . . . Remember when this was a thread about J. Lake?
2012...when we couldn’t afford bottled water for our coaches, or vowels for our new AB members (or, as it was known then, just “B”).Your profile says you joined in 2012 and yet you're surprised allbuffs threads don't remain on topic . . .
I'd add the TD led Broncos to that list.49ers (80s), Cowboys (90s), Rams (Vermeil), Saints, Packers, Colts and most of Belichick's teams all won because their offense controlled the game.
You thinking the Bears have a better shot at the trophy than the Saints or Rams this year?
Not that it matters at all in context of the article, but the author called Peterson "the best coach in the Pac 12 (not named Mike Leach)". Dude.
Not that it matters at all in context of the article, but the author called Peterson "the best coach in the Pac 12 (not named Mike Leach)". Dude.
Not that it matters at all in context of the article, but the author called Peterson "the best coach in the Pac 12 (not named Mike Leach)". Dude.
I’m still not yet sold on Lincoln Riley. He is obviously a great offensive mind, but this is still very much Stoops players, and the defense is hot garbage. If they didn’t have Kyler Murray, they would be probably around an 8 win team.Peterson and Lincoln Riley are in their own stratosphere as far as best coaches West of the Mississippi. Mike Leach goes to bowls, but that's about it.
We have no idea they are even talking to them. We have no idea who is on RGs list.Damn. Watching that interview has me thinking Day and Lake are too close to call as a favorite.
Can’t beleive we have these choices. Looks like a great situation for CU. And a tough call for RG.
We have no idea they are even talking to them. We have no idea who is on RGs list.
Do you? Cause I haven’t seen a list put out by RG. These are guys that AllBuffs want. Who knows if RG is looking at them.
Do you? Cause I haven’t seen a list put out by RG. These are guys that AllBuffs want. Who knows if RG is looking at them.
You’re essentially standing in a forest fire and waiting for a fireman to tell you that the forest is on fire.
Just think: Peterson gave us Hawk and now may give us Lake. An oddity for sure.
Damn. Watching that interview has me thinking Day and Lake are too close to call as a favorite.
Can’t beleive we have these choices. Looks like a great situation for CU. And a tough call for RG.
Get a 247 subscriptionDo you? Cause I haven’t seen a list put out by RG. These are guys that AllBuffs want. Who knows if RG is looking at them.