A pet peeve of mine, too.
I'd take it after a disappointing season and also a disappointing season on the gridiron as well.
A pet peeve of mine, too.
You know the BBall board is dramatically different than the others, even with most of the same posters. They won’t accept criticism, doubt or negativity no matter what.Why? That comment makes you sound like a b-ball snob.
The good thing with FTs -- and this is the most important thing -- is that this team has the ability to get to the line at a high rate. Lots of guys who can win 1-on-1 battles to get a step and draw a foul.
Would love to see that instead of settling for long distance shots like earlier in the game.
I'm impressed with him. He's never going to be a superstar scorer, but his ball handling has improved a lot. Him being able to back up Kin at PG while also being a defensive stopper when he comes in at the 2 as a wing shooter is damn valuable. He's also a hustle guy, which is big for a team that has some gunner types who aren't always dialed in for the defense & loose balls part of the game.Oh, and DeLeon Brown is the PERFECT piece off of the bench. I was really impressed by him on Friday. If he can provide that, it will be a nice piece of the puzzle for us moving forward.
The key is going to be who is taking the FTs in crunch time. Got to figure that's going to mostly be King, Namon and Kin with Dom in that mix. Can those guys be over 70% while getting dialed in when it matters? I think so.I honestly think that this year we're going to have to start from the outside and work in. We don't have anyone down low who can punish people so we're going to have to hit some three's early to open things up for McKinley and others to drive the line. If you think about it, our best post player is King and I'm not sure he's someone I would feel comfortable with posting up and running an iso through him to get a basket when we absolutely had to have one (and this is where @jgisland promptly will find some stats showing me I'm an idiot).
I'm thinking the FT was a bit of a fluke. We have guys who can shoot on this team. Namon and Dom were around 75% in previous years (excluding Dom's frosh year). The frosh have reputations that they can shoot. I'm pretty sure that we won't shoot 45% in a game again. In fact, shooting for everyone in that game was off. CU was 44% from the line and UNC was 45% from the line. CU shot 29% from 3 and UNC shot 16%. It was just a bad shooting game for everyone. I think it's safe to say that we'll finish the season close to the 70% mark than the 50% mark.
I'm impressed with him. He's never going to be a superstar scorer, but his ball handling has improved a lot. Him being able to back up Kin at PG while also being a defensive stopper when he comes in at the 2 as a wing shooter is damn valuable. He's also a hustle guy, which is big for a team that has some gunner types who aren't always dialed in for the defense & loose balls part of the game.
The key is going to be who is taking the FTs in crunch time. Got to figure that's going to mostly be King, Namon and Kin with Dom in that mix. Can those guys be over 70% while getting dialed in when it matters? I think so.
I honestly think that this year we're going to have to start from the outside and work in. We don't have anyone down low who can punish people so we're going to have to hit some three's early to open things up for McKinley and others to drive the line. If you think about it, our best post player is King and I'm not sure he's someone I would feel comfortable with posting up and running an iso through him to get a basket when we absolutely had to have one (and this is where @jgisland promptly will find some stats showing me I'm an idiot).
I'm thinking the FT was a bit of a fluke. We have guys who can shoot on this team. Namon and Dom were around 75% in previous years (excluding Dom's frosh year). The frosh have reputations that they can shoot. I'm pretty sure that we won't shoot 45% in a game again. In fact, shooting for everyone in that game was off. CU was 44% from the line and UNC was 45% from the line. CU shot 29% from 3 and UNC shot 16%. It was just a bad shooting game for everyone. I think it's safe to say that we'll finish the season close to the 70% mark than the 50% mark.