Gold just creamed his shorts over this one - an NFL GM-type guy, what could be better. The Broncos did go 13-3, so clearly that proves Matt can lead a collegiate athletic department.
I love Matt and glad he still supports the program, but to echo others, how in the world does being a player personnel guy translate to running an athletic department??
http://www.virginiasports.com/genrel/oliver_jon00.html
If we're not going to hire an AD, then it needs to be someone like this. No NFL guys or anything like that. He's been running the AD from behind the scenes for at least the last five years. Genius football scheduler. Ties to the west and Pac-12. Gets olympic sports. Gets the revenue game.
Ha, what's your deal, want to reference me in all your posts? Pipe down.
Had Matt managed the intricacies of salary caps for a few years then maybe be intrigued with his budgetary skills, but he's a scout. Not good enough. Sorry Matt.
[tweet]339863522353770497[/tweet]
What?!?! I'm shocked - this guy fits your description perfectly: football guy, experience with successful NFL program, will take football at CU seriously. Your only hesitation is that he hasn't dealt with salary caps??? Good grief, I give up.
a few names i'd like to see considered:
Damon evans (former ad at university of georgia - had to resign because of a dui issue, still did a great job at georgia both with athletics and academics)
mike garrett (currently the ad at langston former ad at usc)
hale irwin (former cu football player and hall of fame golfer, one of the most famous alums lots of contacts)
dave logan (no experience, but loves cu and the cu nation loves this guy. Would energize fund raising and the alumni base)
thomas hansen (former pac-10 commissioner, extensive contacts in the pac 12 foot print, history of making business deals and fund raising)
i'm pretty sure none of these guys is even on the short list, but i'd like to see them at least contacted.
You can be a contrarian all you want, but I was clear when I brought up how NFL GMs are not the same as scouts. GMs are some of the most skilled football execs you'll find. That you're comparing Matt Russell to an NFL GM is ridiculous.
Agreed on the bold part, but they don't leave to take collegiate AD jobs for 2 reasons:
1) It's a step backwards in terms of pay and prestige, and
2) Completely different skill set
Wow, that was quick.
Heard the JPJ center is amazing. If he pulled that off then that's a big feather in the cap. His bio didn't mention it though. I'm partial to UVa though, great school and athletic dept.
Really? And you think donations were just pouring in?
Unfair.
I don't disagree entirely with Gold (haven't read the whole thread, but I think you guys are a little harsh on his basic premise). In many ways ADs are kind of a football GM. It's our number one revenue sport, and number one engagement opportunity with donors. The AD must set the conditions for football succeed...
The AD is someone that rubs shoulders with the donors, he influences admin and decides how to best invest money in coaches, facilities, programs, and so on. A passion for football and sports is all they should have, aside from that they need to be skilled in business and making a brand sell.
http://www.dailycamera.com/cu-colle...ates-at-cu-buffs-athletic-director?source=rss
From a different thread, it shows the DC's list of potential candidates. I can't say anyone appears to be a home run.
I never knew what Solich accomplished as a businessman over the past decade. Pretty damn impressive.
CSU style.Maybe we hire a guy for the sole purpose of getting the facilities built, and then get a "real" AD.
This is beyond dumb. So me saying Bohn wasn't qualified for CU AD based on his Idaho/SDSU track record makes me bb2. I'll never agree with anyone who believes Bohn was qualified. If that deeply offends you, there must be a Bohn appreciation thread you can join. Actually, this might be the thread itself, so welcome aboard.
That's not why, the reason is because you are dumb argument:
1. Mullen gets credit for the relative football success, but wasn't responsible for it.
2. Mullen gets credit just for being hired by Oregon. (The real funny part about this is that after Oregon continues to win, you'll credit him for that, too.)
3. Bohn must have been an unqualified hire, because he had AD experience but not at a big enough school. (as one glaring example, Gene Smith was AD at Eastern Michigan before going moving up to BCS conference schools, your point is ridiculous)
4. Bohn must have been an unqualified hire, because years later his track record proves it (how convenient, and a poor argument)
Your "arguments" don't fit together, but they are conveniently modified by hindsight.
I don't have the numbers, but Dave Brandon budget at Michigan is probably much, much bigger than what we have at CU. Jurich would probably laugh pretty loud if CU called.Michigan's current AD formerly ran a pizza company. That said being the AD at Michigan does not have the same challenges as CU. Ideally I'd like a proven AD. Top of my list would probably be to bring Tom Jurich back to the front range. He's had success with both Louisville's b-ball and football programs, has built tremendous facilities there, and has family ties to the area and liked living here. Louisville is probably willing to pay what it will take to keep him though.