Same except I have USC 5 and UW 6 if the Trojans hand on.
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
Northern Colorado Game Week (Official Thread)
- Thread starter Buffnik
- Start date
I did not think of it that way. Maybe it would, but maybe they would RISE up and put a great game together with something like a silly rating on the line?
I'd have agreed, but USC is too inconsistent after tonight. If both were playing to capability, I'd take USC. Any average day? Gimme UW
wyomingBUFF
Well-Known Member
Sure. Whatever it takes, I'll take it
MarkW
Well-Known Member
Thus far, this season's Buffs don't have the heart or desire that last season's team played with. Last season the team came out with a "take no prisoners" attitude in the CSU game and carried that through much of the season. This season they seem to have the attitude that they can saunter out onto the field and win with no mental effort. It's gonna cost them starting next Saturday night.
Medford M.
Well-Known Member
No. Obviously he wouldn't be benched.
But one fumble shouldn't effect anyones pt going forward. You just have to see what happens next time. If he ****s up again in his next sevral touches, sure, bench him, but we don't have other backs. He really needs to play.
Agreed, but this is the development of a new team. Last years team was technically developed over 4 years and they achieved many of the goals they set out to meet. This team has to create its own mojo. So far, immature and cocky. The schedule is perfectly setup to help them by letting them go 3-0, and then Washington is a measuring stick that will possibly help them win or lose. If they win, maybe they realize they are good and start something really special. If they lose, it will get their sh$t straight and get rid of the cocky and get some focus.
Sounds like you agree "sliding scale" punishment is actually used.
With Evans back, Adkins does not necessarily have to play.
I trust Evans more than Adkins. Adkins did nothing while Evans was out to change that
Does BB look that bad in practice that he can't get a few carries?
From what I've heard, yea
On a team that looks like it is struggling to find the right effort and attitude I'd rather those snaps go to Evans.
He isn't as talented as Adkins but he gives you everything he has every play. Hopefully some of that will rub off .
I think you answered your own question.
Husker message boards calling for a house cleaning after loosing to Northern Illinois. Article on Cornnation says that all of Nebraska's woes can be traced back to November 2001! Downhill since then. You are welcome Huskers! Hate that we spent an entire decade as a tire fire, but oh well.
Medford M.
Well-Known Member
Ill just say if BB starts getting carries ahead of Adkins, Ill blow a gasket.
Sykobuff
Well-Known Member
Ringer
Well-Known Member
Just from sitting in the stands 15 yards from inbounds today, the turning point of the game was the second bullsh*t targeting call. It took that much to get the team and the fans amped. If one just looks at the stats it seems like that was a good game, but in person that was sloppy as hell. I will say that Lindsay is a pure beast.
I'm starting to step off the ledge a little bit. Don't think I would bet on the Buffs to win next week, but I think it is more likely we win than lose by 2 plus touchdowns.
White_Rabbit
Well-Known Member
I have few thoughts on this game because I actually fell asleep at halftime and woke up as the game ended. Pretty sure that's not a good thing as a CU fan
ahoelsken
Well-Known Member
I had a take on this team coming in-It was probably a bowl team unless something went drastically wrong-I didn't see a loss OOC, and I thought this team would beat Cal, the Arizona schools, and Oregon State. Did we have something more than 7 wins and a Vegas/Cactus bowl type of bid? Thats the question that this game with UW will answer.
SuperiorBuff
Well-Known Member
Montez is still painfully slow through his progressions.
NAILED IT
Better what?
Trufflesauce
Well-Known Member
Alabama also played a team with less talent than them today, and ended with a similar point spread.
Buffs vs Northern CO
41 - 21
Alabama vs CSU
41 - 23
This isn't worth reading into too much for many reasons, but I appreciate that our defense only allowed 3 points against CSU. It's just a funny fact to me that CSU scored 20 more points on the number one ranked college football team than on us.
Going by this (flawed) logic, I think it's safe to say Buffs > Alabama > Northern CO > CSU. Buffs 15-0. Calling it
Buffs vs Northern CO
41 - 21
Alabama vs CSU
41 - 23
This isn't worth reading into too much for many reasons, but I appreciate that our defense only allowed 3 points against CSU. It's just a funny fact to me that CSU scored 20 more points on the number one ranked college football team than on us.
Going by this (flawed) logic, I think it's safe to say Buffs > Alabama > Northern CO > CSU. Buffs 15-0. Calling it
Wish I could buy into this logic, but unfortunately, until there are more data points I'm gonna have to go Buffs > Northern CO > Alabama > CSU
Unleash Hell
Well-Known Member
I bet Oregon and Utah get in the top 25 this week and Buffs will be around 26-27
Always BUFF
I post stupid ****
It was a win a few observations: JMac doesn't block he just gets in the defenders way..Bobo blocks. At times the O line held the pocket long enough for a positive play = positive. Obviously the punt returners were instructed to fair catch all punts, speaking of punt returns I say give KD Nixon a shot after all he was recruited for his play making ability. I didn't notice if Winfree or Nixon got any snaps, I saw Shenault got one. I bring this up because OOC games such as the last 2 should've/could've been great opportunities for all three to get some game reps, they got some last week against a better opponent and I expected the same against UNC. Oliver is human and entitled to a "not so great day". Gamboa has a nose for the football but he's a step slow which is a shame. Montez is showing the OCs the plays they should be calling to best use his skills, roll him out and force the D to play him, when they do TD to Fields (cracks me up seeing him wave the WR to go). Haigler = Uuuugh.
Sadly I feel the same.
Does Montez ignore thrwoing towards the flat. I felt that was a successful play last year for Sefo. It's hard to think the playbook and play calling has changed too much.
Also, I think we need to incorporate the jet sweep into the rotation. This week and last week showed how the play is effective with speed. Or at the least get back to that outside toss.
Also, I think we need to incorporate the jet sweep into the rotation. This week and last week showed how the play is effective with speed. Or at the least get back to that outside toss.