Perry has a lot on his plate to learn the Star, so probably not enough time to learn safety also.
Last edited:
But they are solid in the top 5 there. Not special, probably not great anywhere, but solid. They have true stars at the other two levels, so as long as they remain healthy in the Secondary, I don't see why they can't be 6th or better in the conference.Maybe. Not sure we have a true star in the secondary.
But they are solid in the top 5 there. Not special, probably not great anywhere, but solid. They have true stars at the other two levels, so as long as they remain healthy in the Secondary, I don't see why they can't be 6th or better in the conference.
To be mediocre or above average in this conference? Last year CU ranked 5th in the Pac 12 in yards/game and 9th in points/game. To put that in perspective, USC and Oregon were tied for 7th and 8th in points against with 27 ppg, while CU gave up 27.3. Effectively, CU's defense was T-7th in the Pac 12 in PPG and in the upper half in yards against, with DJ Eliot calling plays and a 7 game meltdown. ASU was 6th in the conference at 25.1/game which ranked 49th nationally.You gotta have at least one playmaker in the secondary to reach that level of defense.
To be mediocre or above average in this conference? Last year CU ranked 5th in the Pac 12 in yards/game and 9th in points/game. To put that in perspective, USC and Oregon were tied for 7th and 8th in points against with 27 ppg, while CU gave up 27.3. Effectively, CU's defense was T-7th in the Pac 12 in PPG and in the upper half in yards against, with DJ Eliot calling plays and a 7 game meltdown. ASU was 6th in the conference at 25.1/game which ranked 49th nationally.
Ok, but the 3 OOC games matter and count toward bowl eligibility, and it's not like they had Oregon's OOC schedule to inflate their national statsOr even better perspective: in conference only stats, the defense ranked 10th in scoring defense.
Ok, but the 3 OOC games matter and count toward bowl eligibility, and it's not like they had Oregon's OOC schedule to inflate their national stats
Agree with pretty much everything. Need someone else to disrupt on the DL besides Mustafa, need Wells to take another step forward, and we really need to stay healthy at CB. Those things happen and the defense should hold up. Not great or even good, but not a complete detriment.
I think that's what it comes down to. This secondary will give up yards and some big plays. What we need it to do is not have breakdowns (guys are in position and make the tackle), to hold up in coverage long enough to force a QB to a 2nd or 3rd read on most plays to give the pass rush a chance, and to force turnovers by being aggressive tacklers and going for INTs instead of being satisfied with knocking balls away.You gotta have at least one playmaker in the secondary to reach that level of defense.
Need to add a few interceptions by DBs. Last year we had 4 (WTF?)
Yeah, we can compare the other P12 teams' OOC schedules and I would imagine CU's is somewhere in the middle. Not hard, but certainly not as easy as others.The played a FCS team and two other teams who finished 7-17.
F*ck that only CU should be on that hat, let them have a little a on the back. I hope this is a joke
Yeah, we can compare the other P12 teams' OOC schedules and I would imagine CU's is somewhere in the middle. Not hard, but certainly not as easy as others.
I guess I'll rephrase it... Assuming there's another guy on the DL/OLB who can get after the QB and the Secondary stays healthy, I don't see why they can't have a middling defensive unit across all 12 games.
Recall too, that of those four INTs, two were by Landman!Yikes, forgot that stat.
I also think he'll get out muscled/positioned by bigger recivers as well. He'll be a boom and bust guy.I think Mekhi is a ball hawk who will have a few interceptions this year.
So you're saying there's a chance.... that we pass the ball over the middle of the field?It actually makes defenses defend the middle of the field...
This is why I'm hoping we have somebody that can get to the damn QB, pressure creates mistakes, always has.Need to add a few interceptions by DBs. Last year we had 4 (WTF?)
To be fair, one of those teams was the best 4 win team in the nation, and feared by all.The played a FCS team and two other teams who finished 7-17.
It's been an SOB finding a replacement for Jimmy Gilbert, In '16, Jimmy led the team with 10.5 sacks, 36 total for the team that season. in 2018 the team had just 29 sacks, with Mustafa leading the way @ 7.5. With no edge rusher of Jimmy's caliber, they're going to need to get their sacks done by committee. I could see a group of Landman, Taylor, Wells, and a Mustafa and Tschangam reaching 30+ between them. They're going to need to take some chances, bring a ton a pressure if these DBs are going to have a chance this season.This is why I'm hoping we have somebody that can get to the damn QB, pressure creates mistakes, always has.
Well, if they get pressure from somebody, doesn't matter who. It could be Mustafa, dude is pretty good. I'd love to have an edge rusher, somebody that can flat rush and cause some havoc. When you have that, the secondary can play loose, gamble a bit on plays, because you know they won't have much time.It's been an SOB finding a replacement for Jimmy Gilbert, In '16, Jimmy led the team with 10.5 sacks, 36 total for the team that season. in 2018 the team had just 29 sacks, with Mustafa leading the way @ 7.5. With no edge rusher of Jimmy's caliber, they're going to need to get their sacks done by committee. I could see a group of Landman, Taylor, Wells, and a Mustafa and Tschangam reaching 30+ between them. They're going to need to take some chances, bring a ton a pressure if these DBs are going to have a chance this season.
https://www.espn.com/college-football/team/stats/_/id/38/season/2016
Well, if they get pressure from somebody, doesn't matter who. It could be Mustafa, dude is pretty good. I'd love to have an edge rusher, somebody that can flat rush and cause some havoc. When you have that, the secondary can play loose, gamble a bit on plays, because you know they won't have much time.
Me too, we need someone to do it.I am thinking/hoping Alex Tchangam will be this guy in 2019
I wasn't predicting anything, if you were talking to me. Just said we need that for our D. We don't have a lot of depth on the back end, a pass rush helps that quite a bit.I love preseason chatter predicting our strengths and weaknesses and who will or won’t or must step up. The season almost never plays out the way we think or expect. Guys we dismissed will contribute. Guys we counted on will fail. It’s all why we keep coming back.
I wasn’t referring to anyone in particular you narcissistic peckerwood!I wasn't predicting anything, if you were talking to me. Just said we need that for our D. We don't have a lot of depth on the back end, a pass rush helps that quite a bit.
Pretty sure conjecture and speculation are big reasons why this place even exists. Sort of weird seeing this remark coming from you, thought members of Greatest Generation lived for these sort of pastimes.I love preseason chatter predicting our strengths and weaknesses and who will or won’t or must step up. The season almost never plays out the way we think or expect. Guys we dismissed will contribute. Guys we counted on will fail. It’s all why we keep coming back.
I believe that was the old geezer’s pointPretty sure conjecture and speculation are big reasons why this place even exists. Sort of weird seeing this remark coming from you, thought members of Greatest Generation lived for these sort of pastimes.