Blackmon for sure would. It felt like Perry was pushed out (in fact, pretty sure it was confirmed on 247 that they encouraged Perry to move on)I’m not sure Blackmon or Perry would start this year, but I agree with your depth argument
Blackmon for sure would. It felt like Perry was pushed out (in fact, pretty sure it was confirmed on 247 that they encouraged Perry to move on)I’m not sure Blackmon or Perry would start this year, but I agree with your depth argument
I’m not sure Reed doesn’t catch BlackmonBlackmon for sure would. It felt like Perry was pushed out (in fact, pretty sure it was confirmed on 247 that they encouraged Perry to move on)
Even if that’s true, it just adds to the depth. Had Gonzo, Blackmon and Perry all stayed, the depth would be very good, no matter who eventually won the starting jobs.I’m not sure Reed doesn’t catch Blackmon
How many snaps are all these edges going to get? Where is Main on the projected depth chart? Somewhere behind Lange? Or Thomas?I guess I’ve missed the discussion about Main being a spark guy/difference maker
Main seems to be DE2 behind Lang and Alvin Williams seems to be EDGE2 behind Thomas.How many snaps are all these edges going to get? Where is Main on the projected depth chart? Somewhere behind Lange? Or Thomas?
“It’ll be different this time! I’m sure it’ll happen!”Love all of the pre first game optimism creeping in. This team is bad folks. The o will be moderately better but not much and the D will be markedly worse. The coaching will tick up slightly. Every other team made at least the same if not substantially more improvement in the off-season. That is a recipe for regression overall. Quite a bit actually. Everyone should be ecstatic f they win 3 games. That will be the best this team will deliver
I have to laugh at this part of the post. It's asinine to say everyone else will improve too. That just isnt how it works, or everything would be the same every year and every team would improve into perpetuity.Love all of the pre first game optimism creeping in. This team is bad folks. The o will be moderately better but not much and the D will be markedly worse. The coaching will tick up slightly. Every other team made at least the same if not substantially more improvement in the off-season. That is a recipe for regression overall. Quite a bit actually. Everyone should be ecstatic f they win 3 games. That will be the best this team will deliver
I don’t see it. Good plays is Spring game we’re due to BLew throwing late. He will have his hands full against TCU WR.I’m not sure Reed doesn’t catch Blackmon
This is quite a statement. Every team gets better every year?Every other team made at least the same if not substantially more improvement in the off-season.
And the Buffs only get worse. Every year.This is quite a statement. Every team gets better every year?
It's more important to look at positional/unit match ups and where and when we play our opponents. For instance, TCU will be better than us at most positions, but it's Game 1 and we're at home. You could say we have an advantage due them having a brand new coaching staff, but we basically do as well so that's wash. Against Arizona, if it was a home game we'd likely blow them out like last year because we're better than them at most positions. The road game throws it off a bit. You also have to figure that they will be 0-4 at that point. Will they be checked out or will they be pissed off and see CU as an equal opponent that they have a great chance to get win #1 against at home?This is quite a statement. Every team gets better every year?
One could argue that given BLewis's stats despite all the offensive dysfunction around him, that he actually did pretty well. I mean, to have the bull**** dysfunction in the line, to take the pounding he did and still only throw 3 INT and make the best of historically ****ty OL coaching and offensive play calling is to me, actually a bright spot. I don't think it's kool-aid or the new season for me, I just think he kept at it really well for being a frosh last year. I think we go 4-8, but we're actually competitive and lose by just a few some exciting games.I think it’s entirely possible, and maybe even likely, that while Sanford’s track record is essentially mediocrity, he elevates the worst FBS offense from last year, to a serviceable unit in 2022.
I think fans are actually underestimating just how awful the offensive coordination, play calling, QB coaching and OL coaching were last year. I think this could be a rare circumstance where there is pretty large addition by subtraction.
Yep, no idea how we won 4 games last year, but we did it! Yay!I think that even Chev would have had us at "unacceptable team weakness" last year on offense if our OL coaching hadn't been such a nightmare that we improved by switching mid season to an intern who got along with the guys & did nothing more than say to go back to what you did before the blocking sled system.
From there, serviceable isn't a big jump with upgrades to OL, TE, WR and especially an experienced OC who also coaches the QBs. Hell, just having a legitimate offensive staff all on the same page - even if they aren't world beaters - is orders of magnitude better.
Hey, I bet heavy on the over.Da Lama & Manhattan
View attachment 53152
When sunshine pumping is "I see a path to competence that could make us competitive enough that games are watchable and we're not eliminated from bowl eligibility before November"... well, that's just sad.There is zero Kool Aid in this thread. A winless season is possible. A mild surprise to the upside to produce a couple more wins could happen if some of the offseason moves really pan out in coaching changes, some incoming transfers, and some serviceable depth on the defensive line.
*Upside does not mean a bowl game. A bowl game would be a shocking upside development.
Serviceable depth on OL? Not sure.There is zero Kool Aid in this thread. A winless season is possible. A mild surprise to the upside to produce a couple more wins could happen if some of the offseason moves really pan out in coaching changes, some incoming transfers, and some serviceable depth on the defensive line.
*Upside does not mean a bowl game. A bowl game would be a shocking upside development.
Have you seen the ophthalmologist lately?Serviceable depth on OL? Not sure.
Brown is dinged. He needs to be healthy. He’s OG1 and OT3. Otherwise, Femske at OG. Somebody has to emerge. This unit is 6 now, max.
It’s the best depth at DL this program has had since at least 2016, though. I would rate DL as probably the top, maybe #2 or 3 position group that determines success in CFB. QB/OL may be more importantServiceable depth on OL? Not sure.
Brown is dinged. He needs to be healthy. He’s OG1 and OT3. Otherwise, Femske at OG. Somebody has to emerge. This unit is 6 now, max.
Have you seen the ophthalmologist lately?
Ha. Gotcha.Have you seen the ophthalmologist lately?
The offensive line on the other hand isn’t a huge question mark. It’s not going to be good. It may be better, but to your point that depends on the success of the transfer portal with both Fenske and Brown. Fenske didn’t show a whole bunch last year, but that was with good ol Mitch Rod trying to unlearn him all that bad technique he learned at Iowa (insert eye roll). Brown being injured this far away from the time of transfer brings back bad memories about ten times over starting with Clint Werth eons ago.Ha. Gotcha.
Yep.The offensive line on the other hand isn’t a huge question mark. It’s not going to be good. It may be better, but to your point that depends on the success of the transfer portal with both Fenske and Brown. Fenske didn’t show a whole bunch last year, but that was with good ol Mitch Rod trying to unlearn him all that bad technique he learned at Iowa (insert eye roll). Brown being injured this far away from the time of transfer brings back bad memories about ten times over starting with Clint Werth eons ago.