He won't be. Just saying.
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
Official 2023 Fall Camp Thread
- Thread starter Buffnik
- Start date
- Status
McCaskill is still not completely healthy - I was told he's 85-90% today. He has not participated in either scrimmage - I certainly don't expect him to play early in the year, if at all.
Big Jim
WTF?
And the more variables one’s model has, the less accurate they become and the more variations one has to run.
It's not models itself but rather the inputs and assumptions and data controls used in them.
How is Manhattan's model accounting for schematic changes, especially for a new coach? What assumptions are being made there? How about changes in competition? Is it the same playing in the SEC v Pac 12?
MB needs to provide data to support his model being able to actually model CU here.
That's accounted for by the teacup of marbles.
Why the f would MB need to provide that?
1. Schematc changes on their own are not as important to offensive player predictions since my model rates usefulness on a per pay basis. The model does account for plays per game, which is the critical statistic. There’s ample evidence in the model from Kent State and similar offenses to help predict per game play counts.
2. Defensive players are modeled on a usefulness per play basis in all schemes. The key variable we’ve found is the number of offensive plays, not the defensive scheme.
3. Competition is assessed by opponent inputs. My model rates every player. A productive player against other productive players has a higher rating than a productive player against less productive players.
4. My model does not apply only to Colorado. It applies to every team in FBS. We rate FCS players after their season concludes for transfer purposes only.
My inputs and analtytical choices are carefully designed to be as accurate as possible since the predictions generated are attached to actual wagered dollars. My models in American College Football and European Football have beaten sportsbooks every year for over a decade.
Are you implying your model beats the battle-tested system of:
>wake up at 9am
>hungover
>take a piss
>”oh damn there’s CFB today”
>pours cereal bowl
>sits on couch in boxers
>eat cereal and open draftkings
>bet on G5 traps you know nothing about
My friends have used it to great success. I think they’re only a few K in the hole
hell yeah love a good k hole on game day
I wish that I got to bet against those people. My opponents are corporations who have business relationships with sports media/leagues.
Lots of dudes leaning heavily into the downers these days, never got it as an upper connoisseur myself. Call me LilStimmy
All of this and no top 25 or pac predictions. Come on @manhattanbuff, i gotta see what you got and if it's the goods.
Let's see who got more of the goods, me or you. I just watch a lot of football, listen to coaches, and know tendencies extremely well. I don't have any cpu algorithms or anything like that. I actually think that makes you a lot better for teams I don't watch but for teams I watch and heavily watch, idk, I think I can compete. I was one of the top Draftkings guys for years and I never create an cpu algorithm once or paid anyone for anything.
You too good for some spray paint in a paper bag, Mr Fancypants?
You have to call his 1-900 number. $4.99 per minute.
Because the model says something differently than I want it to say after mainlining koolaid for months.
Thats a good question.
I didn't know he was a professional expert but I could tell he was someone that is serious business.
I was just saying, I want to test me v. Him in what I do know. I am knowledgeable and have done well in Vegas and didn't need any tools to do it or hedging to do it as long as it's in my realm of what I know. I've beat many pros before. Been beat by pros as well. I want to test my confidence v. His elite algorithm.
Don't be that guy. I haven't disrespected no one here. Don't be that guy. I've been respectful the entire time even when I wasn't aware of his history.
I think Denver_sc was only talking about himself, not anybody else.
I found Manhattan’s take encouraging, am I crazy for that? A ceiling of 9 wins is higher than anyone on the planet has for us - I know that would require unfathomable injury luck, but still. I am a major homer and would have had our ceiling at 7 wins lol. And he said he raised the floor and ceiling due to what he’s seen.
Depth, especially in some spots, was always going to be a major question mark. Manhattan has been pretty optimistic all offseason. We’re gonna ****ing win.
Depth, especially in some spots, was always going to be a major question mark. Manhattan has been pretty optimistic all offseason. We’re gonna ****ing win.
Klatt was very complimentary and bullish on CUs chances this season and said he thinks CU wins at least one of the first two. He’s also not very high on TCU.
In Barzil, I have a thread that details the answer to your request.
As Ken said, I was only speaking for myself.
I listened to his podcast this morning. I felt like he really wanted to say they will start 3-0, but just couldn't.
- Status