I believe you are correct. I don't believe there is currently a process to toss a player for a hit like that.
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
Official Colorado State Game Thread
- Thread starter 96 Buff
- Start date
I believe you are correct. I don't believe there is currently a process to toss a player for a hit like that.
Yes of course. It’s not a bad thing because we probably won’t win a game the rest of the way without him, but a running QB will always give you a shot
Seems like there should be.
NVM. ITB posted it.
hawg1
Well-Known Member
Nobody is willing to die on this hill. I’m not. That was a horrible evening. But he was not convicted of rape. Let’s not have a forum where you can post flat out lies.
How about you go cry about the SA particulars and split hairs about lies in the other thread?
This, it wasn't targeting by the rules because the heads weren't involved.
I already have a problem with what I am going to write because it creates another huge judgement call that could potentially change games but I thing the rules should provide that if a player hits another player after the play is clearly over in a manner that does or is likely to cause injury the player making the hit should be gone in addition to the unsportsmanlike penalty of 15 yards, similar in fashion to the targeting. I see the hit on Hunter as a clear example of how that rule would be applied.
Football is a dangerous enough game for the players inside the rules. They shouldn't have to deal with headhunters trying to take them out of games.
They have to let S2 open the game up early imo. I know they're trying to establish things, but when you just give him the ball and say 'go' he is a magician
ahoelsken
Well-Known Member
Wyoming and AFA both smoke them. That isn't a good team. They played hard and got their moral victory....but they may win three games.
Best part of this stuff is now the Denver media is going after them
hawg1
Well-Known Member
I was not aware of the other thread. I’ll post there. I am not splitting hairs. Im certainly not crying. He was not convicted of rape.
Tucson aside: I had to hit my brakes the other night to damn near not hit a big Javelina that ran in front of my car at 8 PM on Pontatoc between River and Sunrise. These suckers are nocturnal and very elusive as I’m sure you know…..
Fogo
Well-Known Member
30%? waaaaaayyyyy low
Wyoming and AFA both smoke them. That isn't a good team. They played hard and got their moral victory....but they may win three games.
Best part of this stuff is now the Denver media is going after them
It is going national
The thing with the F’ing sheep is they will do well in some games then crater to San Jose State, UNLV, or New Mexico. Total trash…,Wyoming and AFA both smoke them. That isn't a good team. They played hard and got their moral victory....but they may win three games.
Best part of this stuff is now the Denver media is going after them
Yes, I do.
The only bright spot among our linebacking core.
You just said that with a straight face as if it is unheard of for a football roster to have accused or convicted or registered offenders on them.
FFS.
NCAA looks the other way as college athletes punished for sex offenses play on
The NCAA metes out punishments to student athletes for bad grades, smoking pot or taking money. Yet it has no specific penalties for sex assault.
www.usatoday.com
I’m on this a million times. That’s the new name for the dump formerly known as CSU.Cheap Shot University - absolute clowns both on the field and off.
I said it sucks to be a cheap shot u ram! Go Buffs
Last edited:
Big Jim
WTF?
hawg1
Well-Known Member
Can we all go to the other thread? Thanks.You just said that with a straight face as if it is unheard of for a football roster to have accused or convicted or registered offenders on them.
FFS.
NCAA looks the other way as college athletes punished for sex offenses play on
The NCAA metes out punishments to student athletes for bad grades, smoking pot or taking money. Yet it has no specific penalties for sex assault.www.usatoday.com
Ahhh now it makes sense why Kanell has been such a little bitch about Prime
Nope. Deserves one though.
I was one of those CU fans that supported the continuance of the CSU-CU series but after last night's game, I'm ready to end the series for awhile. I still think next year's game is still on but we surely can cancel the rest of the games in the series.
I said this after the win against corn last week, Mitchell is playing at a very high level that I would vote him as the D MVP. He should be the baseline of our LB performance starting from next year.
Without him, our D would be very similar to the 2016 buffs, okay edge, mediocre interior DL, slow LB, soft in the middle that other team can run at will if they want.
Without him, our D would be very similar to the 2016 buffs, okay edge, mediocre interior DL, slow LB, soft in the middle that other team can run at will if they want.
WWCD
Well-Known Member
Are you sure? The 2016 defense was better than this one and it's not close
Probably.
But very few quarterbacks (statistically) do the running themselves. The per game average is very low.
I think, and someone correct me if I’m wrong, for it to be “targeting,” it has to be a hit to the head or neck area.