Done in your name.ymssr sock. REP THIS MAN PEOPLE.
That creek path deal ended up looking great.
Done in your name.ymssr sock. REP THIS MAN PEOPLE.
That creek path deal ended up looking great.
Nice Pix. Looks like they are about half done with the IPF external structure then. Is there evidence there will be a new bridge over Boulder Creek as part of this? I thought they were concerned about Dal Ward stairs dropping directly onto that road, and were thinking of moving the road further North at some point?
Nice Pix. Looks like they are about half done with the IPF external structure then. Is there evidence there will be a new bridge over Boulder Creek as part of this? I thought they were concerned about Dal Ward stairs dropping directly onto that road, and were thinking of moving the road further North at some point?
CU needs another $4 million to finish the expansion, bringing the total to $160 million. Those with a better understanding of the construction world can say if this is normal or not for a job of this size. There do seem to have been a lot of delays and hopefully this thing is done by the first home game. I saw a note in one of the articles that the team is currently using the visiting locker room in Folsom until the new locker room is complete.
http://www.buffzone.com/cu-news/ci_28606301/cu-boulder-stadium-expansion-needs-extra-4m
Edit - Here's the quote from the other article on BuffZone:
Getting antsy
While waiting for their new locker room to be completed, the Buffs are using the visiting team locker room at Folsom Field. They are expected to get into their new digs at some point this month.
"We can't wait," tackle Stephane Nembot said. "It's been a long process. We don't know where to meet sometimes, but now soon we are moving and we can't wait. Everything is going to be in order finally."
nothing like a little combative and negative journalism to remind me that we still are in Boulder.
http://www.buffzone.com/cu-news/ci_28606301/cu-boulder-stadium-expansion-needs-extra-4m
What's "combative and negative" about this piece? It seems to more or less just be stating that there is more money needed and not only for the athletic facilities but others on campus as well. To me negative would be directly or indirectly stating that the athletic facilities are a waste of money, etc. I didn't get that from the article.
Now certainly there are many people in Boulder who would oppose construction of new athletic facilities, but that's not coming out in this article.
Its written from a negative stance. Sarah Kuta has been anti-facilities since the project was announced. Its a non story anyway. Its written to rile up the anti athletics population of Boulder.
So far, the comments indicate failure on that front.
Check out the comments on the same article on the BDC home page
http://www.dailycamera.com/cu-news/...m-expansion-needs-extra-4m?source=mostpopular
nothing like a little combative and negative journalism to remind me that we still are in Boulder.
http://www.buffzone.com/cu-news/ci_28606301/cu-boulder-stadium-expansion-needs-extra-4m
What's "combative and negative" about this piece? It seems to more or less just be stating that there is more money needed and not only for the athletic facilities but others on campus as well. To me negative would be directly or indirectly stating that the athletic facilities are a waste of money, etc. I didn't get that from the article.
Now certainly there are many people in Boulder who would oppose construction of new athletic facilities, but that's not coming out in this article.