When you take out McMillan's and Montez' top runs (75 and 49 respectively), the team rushed for 93 yards on 34 carries. Against the Beavers. That's horrible. And yes, it is on the Oline.
When you take out McMillan's and Montez' top runs (75 and 49 respectively), the team rushed for 93 yards on 34 carries. Against the Beavers. That's horrible. And yes, it is on the Oline.
I think it is even worse than that...even Stuart Smalley would grab what he wanted....
I know you’re joking, but even the suggestion of fabricating a story about rape is pretty disgusting IMO.here's my summary of where things stand:
Well, shjt. Assuming all three bullets are true, where does this leave us?
- there seems to be good reason to lack confidence in HCMM and valid reasons to make a change
- the buyout is >= $9M and CUAD is not a cash heavy department
- according to the narrative on Allbuffs throughout 2017, ADRG spent most of political capitol within the university to get HCMM the big raise
i'm not trying to come across as overly negative of RG. I don't follow CU fund raising and AD adminsistration close enough to do so. I was critical of the raise when it happened in 2017 (HCMM had no leverage in Spring 2017 when the raise was awarded) but two respected posters here convinced me the long game RG was playing was worth the investment and risk.
I'm seriously interested in anyone's thoughts as to how we move forward, other than a BMD coming in, opening the checkbook and saving the day. Can RG negotiate with the CU powers-that-be (Board of Regents? University Pres? I don't really know who holds the power here) to spend the $$$ for a change? is there a glimmer of hope in HCMM such to warrant giving one more year (in context of increasing difficulty of schedule over the next two)? Find or fabricate a reason to fire MM for cause (images of an attractive female student seducing him and later claiming rape)?
I'm not seeing how we get out of this.
For an immediate escape, a two-way Sugar Daddy is required. 1) pat off MM; 2) help hire new HC.here's my summary of where things stand:
Well, shjt. Assuming all three bullets are true, where does this leave us?
- there seems to be good reason to lack confidence in HCMM and valid reasons to make a change
- the buyout is >= $9M and CUAD is not a cash heavy department
- according to the narrative on Allbuffs throughout 2017, ADRG spent most of political capitol within the university to get HCMM the big raise
i'm not trying to come across as overly negative of RG. I don't follow CU fund raising and AD adminsistration close enough to do so. I was critical of the raise when it happened in 2017 (HCMM had no leverage in Spring 2017 when the raise was awarded) but two respected posters here convinced me the long game RG was playing was worth the investment and risk.
I'm seriously interested in anyone's thoughts as to how we move forward, other than a BMD coming in, opening the checkbook and saving the day. Can RG negotiate with the CU powers-that-be (Board of Regents? University Pres? I don't really know who holds the power here) to spend the $$$ for a change? is there a glimmer of hope in HCMM such to warrant giving one more year (in context of increasing difficulty of schedule over the next two)? Find or fabricate a reason to fire MM for cause (images of an attractive female student seducing him and later claiming rape)?
I'm not seeing how we get out of this.
Pat off MM? The SEC is dirty.For an immediate escape, a two-way Sugar Daddy is required. 1) pat off MM; 2) help hire new HC.
There are things MM can overtly do as well as substantially seeding a well coordinated whisper campaign.
What is this ****? Use your head and delete this garbage. Don’t be a weirdo.here's my summary of where things stand:
Well, shjt. Assuming all three bullets are true, where does this leave us?
- there seems to be good reason to lack confidence in HCMM and valid reasons to make a change
- the buyout is >= $9M and CUAD is not a cash heavy department
- according to the narrative on Allbuffs throughout 2017, ADRG spent most of political capitol within the university to get HCMM the big raise
i'm not trying to come across as overly negative of RG. I don't follow CU fund raising and AD adminsistration close enough to do so. I was critical of the raise when it happened in 2017 (HCMM had no leverage in Spring 2017 when the raise was awarded) but two respected posters here convinced me the long game RG was playing was worth the investment and risk.
I'm seriously interested in anyone's thoughts as to how we move forward, other than a BMD coming in, opening the checkbook and saving the day. Can RG negotiate with the CU powers-that-be (Board of Regents? University Pres? I don't really know who holds the power here) to spend the $$$ for a change? is there a glimmer of hope in HCMM such to warrant giving one more year (in context of increasing difficulty of schedule over the next two)? Find or fabricate a reason to fire MM for cause (images of an attractive female student seducing him and later claiming rape)?
I'm not seeing how we get out of this.
Don't have to worry about that. Over the summer the Pac-12 passed a rule that their teams need to win at least 6 games to go to a bowl.Wasn’t there a discussion last year about how 5-7 teams occasionally go bowling? Guessing a team that lost its last 7 games wouldn’t be a first choice though -
Ummm is that tweet still there or is it deleted or is it fake?Haven't seen anyone talking about this? Can't imagine its accurate but still...
Haven't seen anyone talking about this? Can't imagine its accurate but still...
Not still there (or never was)Ummm is that tweet still there or is it deleted or is it fake?
They deleted the tweet.Ummm is that tweet still there or is it deleted or is it fake?
Was it actually Brett McMurphys account or fake?They deleted the tweet.
Good catch. I can’t imagine McMurphy would tweet that and delete it without saying something to take responsibility.Is it normal to date things 28/10/18 on twitter? I speak European and all like an educated ‘merican, but seems a bit odd.
Wasn’t there a discussion last year about how 5-7 teams occasionally go bowling? Guessing a team that lost its last 7 games wouldn’t be a first choice though -
Good catch. I can’t imagine McMurphy would tweet that and delete it without saying something to take responsibility.
Arizona opens as a 4 point favorite
I almost wonder who else could even be the interim HC...The staff isn't super experienced.Yikes if that is at all true.