Bama Charlie
Well-Known Member
uhhhhh no
Why don't you go play a real team and schedule and then get back to me
We have a top 10 win. They don't.
uhhhhh no
Why don't you go play a real team and schedule and then get back to me
We have a top 10 win. They don't.
To add a few missing facts:
The highest ranked team that Bama beat is the current #7 team in the AP, and Bama destroyed them.
The highest ranked team that OSU beat is current #11 KSU, and the game was tied with 3 minutes left.
Controversy over No. 2: Rematch or new opponent?
There were many theories how Florida jumped Michigan in the final poll. Some sportswriters theorized that it was not a matter of which was the better team, claiming Florida had an advantage in the polls because they had played the last two weeks while Michigan had not, or that voters were swayed due to Florida coach Urban Meyer's "campaign"[SUP][citation needed][/SUP] to get Florida into the BCS National Championship Game.[SUP][4][/SUP][SUP][5][/SUP][SUP][6][/SUP] The fact that the difference in the final BCS Poll was due to human voters, not computer rankings, gives some credence to these theories. Other theories suggest that since Michigan did not win their conference title, they did not deserve to play for the BCS National Championship, or that a rematch between Michigan and Ohio State was not favored by the poll voters.[SUP][7][/SUP] The controversy was largely resolved when USC defeated Michigan 32–18 in the 2007 Rose Bowl, and Florida beat top-ranked Ohio State 41–14 in the BCS Championship Game.
So all the SEC lovers here, did you want a rematch of Ohio State Michigan in 2006?
No-there were two teams better than Michigan.
Michigan only lost to Ohio State. Ohio State hadn't lost to anyone. Am I doing this right?
USC and Florida were both better than Michigan.
USC and Florida were both better than Michigan.
How did we know that? Michigan's only loss was to the best team in the country. Clearly they deserved a rematch...
If we know LSU is better than UA then isn't Iowa State better than OSU?
How did we know that? Michigan's only loss was to the best team in the country. Clearly they deserved a rematch...
Florida disagrees with your assumption the tOSU is best team in the country.
To answer all you haters-the voters knew Florida was better than Michigan just like the voters/polls/computers know Alabama is better than OSU. Most of you include fairness/compassion in your reason to pump up OSU.
You know we are better. You just hate it. Just think you will get to see an SEC team lose the BCSCG this year.
It's awesome that we knew Florida was going to win that game when the final polls were being done.
One big reason Florida passed Michigan is because voters knew that Michigan didn't deserve a rematch against a team that already beat them.
:lol: Like I said you have no argument except you are a homer. There is nothing wrong with being a homer but don't say we have no clue what we are talking about and that we are haters.
:lol: Like I said you have no argument except you are a homer. There is nothing wrong with being a homer but don't say we have no clue what we are talking about and that we are haters.
So when Alabama gets the rematch you will admit it is because they know they deserve it?
The polls are going to say you are biased or wrong. I will let you pick which one.
Michigan might have a legal case if the BCS shows it bias against the SEC. They is no reason Bama should play a rematch if Michigan wasn't allowed one. Michigan had even more of a reason to play in the championship game than Alabama does.
I'd also be pissed if I was a LSu fan. What do they have to gain by playing Bama? They beat them on Bama's field. Bama also got to sit at home and watch getting an extra bye week.
The chance to beat Bama twice in one year - THE GREATEST ALABAMA TEAM EVER - is well worth the risk. Even though we already beat them in their own back yard, it's something they would never get over. Remember Miles is 5 - 2 vs Alabama, and 3 - 2 in Tuscaloosa. LSU is just a team out looking for RED blood.Michigan might have a legal case if the BCS shows it bias against the SEC. They is no reason Bama should play a rematch if Michigan wasn't allowed one. Michigan had even more of a reason to play in the championship game than Alabama does.
I'd also be pissed if I was a LSu fan. What do they have to gain by playing Bama? They beat them on Bama's field. Bama also got to sit at home and watch getting an extra bye week.
View attachment 8006
The chance to beat Bama twice in one year - THE GREATEST ALABAMA TEAM EVER - is well worth the risk. Even though we already beat them in their own back yard, it's something they would never get over. Remember Miles is 5 - 2 vs Alabama, and 3 - 2 in Tuscaloosa. LSU is just a team out looking for RED blood.