OSU vs Stanford

[Buffarino]

he's a MAN baby

A merMAN? :lol:

 

[Darth Snow]

A merMAN? :lol:

With a HOTrack!

 

[ladyblaise]

The AP is like the honey badger of polls,it can do whatever the **** it wants

:rofl:

:thumbsup:

 

[CVilleBuff]

What a big break to hold the Pokes to a FG after turning the ball over on the 3 yard line

 

[Darth Snow]

What a big break to hold the Pokes to a FG after turning the ball over on the 3 yard line

That isn't a break. That is called great play.

 

[CVilleBuff]

That isn't a break. That is called great play.

you say tomato..

 

[Darth Snow]

you say tomato..

I say one is luck, and the other is skill.

 

[Darth Snow]

good lord Luck needs a WR.

 

[Buffnik]

good lord Luck needs a WR.

This is why he should have won the Heisman. He's got nuthin' at WR. Stanford would have been a borderline bowl team without him.

 

[Darth Snow]

This is why he should have won the Heisman. He's got nuthin' at WR. Stanford would have been a borderline bowl team without him.

yup. he had one to start the year, and it is no coincidence that Stanford's only loss came once he went out. I'm frankly appalled at Stanford's depth at the position, someone screwed up bad there.

 

[buffs]

I agree Luck should have won Heisman. On another note amazing that Stanford has 4 FB's on scholarship. Hope we get there.

 

[Quattro]

yup. he had one to start the year, and it is no coincidence that Stanford's only loss came once he went out. I'm frankly appalled at Stanford's depth at the position, someone screwed up bad there.

Yup.

Stanford is going to be mediocre at best next year.

 

[JimmyBuff]

Yup.

Stanford is going to be mediocre at best next year.

:lol: CU going what 9-3 next year?

 

[JimmyBuff]

yup. he had one to start the year, and it is no coincidence that Stanford's only loss came once he went out. I'm frankly appalled at Stanford's depth at the position, someone screwed up bad there.

Does he play defense too? Cause that is why STanford lost to Oregon. Had no chance at stopping that attack

 

[Darth Snow]

Does he play defense too? Cause that is why STanford lost to Oregon. Had no chance at stopping that attack

well their O getting stopped in the 2d half and having no deep threat sort of helped that loss as well. Stanford didn't have the horses to keep up with that Oregon attack, which I believe scored more than 30 points in every single game this year, including against Wiscy's top 10 D. So perhaps my statement wasn't completely worthless.

 

[Deleted member 807]

Blackmon is a stud

 

[Quattro]

:lol: CU going what 9-3 next year?

What does what I said have anything to do with CU next year other than Stanford will be a winnable game at home.

 

[cnbuff410]

Stanford didn't have the horses to keep up with that Oregon attack, which I believe scored more than 30 points in every single game this year, including against Wiscy's top 10 D. So perhaps my statement wasn't completely worthless.

Wait a minute, Wiscy top 10 D? You mean in Big10? :lol:

 

[Buffnik]

Larry Fitzgerald rockin the ascot. :lol:

 

[Darth Snow]

Wait a minute, Wiscy top 10 D? You mean in Big10? :lol:

well, wiscy is in the big 10, but yes, their D prior to today was ranked in the top 10 in the nation.

 

[cnbuff410]

well, wiscy is in the big 10, but yes, their D prior to today was ranked in the top 10 in the nation.

Well, I didn't really check any stat, but if you keep following B1G football all over this season, I think it's pretty obvious that in terms of D, MSU > OSU > PSU > UM > Wisc

 

[Darth Snow]

Well, I didn't really check any stat, but if you keep following B1G football all over this season, I think it's pretty obvious that in terms of D, MSU > OSU > PSU > UM > Wisc

Please back that up with facts and I will be happy to concede the point.

 

[JimmyBuff]

What does what I said have anything to do with CU next year other than Stanford will be a winnable game at home.

I think I'll remember this post just in case its a big loss.

 

[Quattro]

I think I'll remember this post just in case its a big loss.

Go for it. Stanford is going to have a massive drop off next year without the best QB in NCAA since Manning.

 

[Idot Buff]

I think I'll remember this post just in case its a big loss.

Don't argue with a butt munch.

 

[JimmyBuff]

Please back that up with facts and I will be happy to concede the point.

Fact: Wisconsin played a weak nonconference schedule and a bunch of bad offensive teams in the Big 10. The only 2 legit teams they played were michigan state twice and Oregon. 37, 39, 45 were the amount of points that they gave up. STill want to say that's a Top 10 defense?

 

[MtnBuff]

Snow is right according to the NCAA stats.

[h=3]Bowl Subdivision (FBS) National Team Report
Total Defense[/h]

Year: 2011

Thru: 12/31/11 Minimum Pct. of Games Played

1	Alabama	12	676	2295	3.39	12	191.25	11	1	0
2	LSU	13	828	3277	3.96	14	252.08	13	0	0
3	Georgia	13	790	3490	4.42	33	268.46	10	3	0
4	South Carolina	12	773	3227	4.17	25	268.92	10	2	0
5	Michigan St.	13	832	3545	4.26	30	272.69	10	3	0
6	Florida St.	13	859	3575	4.16	25	275.00	9	4	0
7	Illinois	13	842	3720	4.42	31	286.15	7	6	0
8	Wisconsin	13	786	3809	4.85	28	293.00	11	2	0
9	Florida	12	788	3595	4.56	31	299.58	6	6	0
10	Penn St.	12	823	3611	4.39	22	300.92	9	3	0
11	UCF	12	732	3640	4.97	25	303.33	5	7	0
12	Texas	13	865	3979	4.60	32	306.08	8	5	0
13	Temple	13	829	4053	4.89	24	311.77	9	4	0
14	BYU	13	832	4074	4.90	33	313.38	10	3	0
15	Virginia Tech	13	813	4081	5.02	29	313.92	11	2	0
16	Rutgers	13	831	4084	4.91	28	314.15	9	4	0
17	Michigan	12	727	3811	5.24	26	317.58	10	2	0
18	Boise St.	13	806	4171	5.17	33	320.85	12	1	0
19	Vanderbilt	13	871	4196	4.82	35	322.77	6	7	0
20	Arkansas St.	12	846	3908	4.62	28	325.67	10	2	0

RankNameGamesPlaysYdsAvgTDsYdspgmWinsLossesTies

 

[JimmyBuff]

Go for it. Stanford is going to have a massive drop off next year without the best QB in NCAA since Manning.

So who will have a better QB CU or Stanford next yr?

 

[Darth Snow]

Fact: Wisconsin played a weak nonconference schedule and a bunch of bad offensive teams in the Big 10. The only 2 legit teams they played were michigan state twice and Oregon. 37, 39, 45 were the amount of points that they gave up. STill want to say that's a Top 10 defense?

see below. weak schedule or not, they were a damn solid D.

Snow is right according to the NCAA stats.

Bowl Subdivision (FBS) National Team Report
Total Defense

Year: 2011

Thru: 12/31/11 Minimum Pct. of Games Played

1	Alabama	12	676	2295	3.39	12	191.25	11	1	0
2	LSU	13	828	3277	3.96	14	252.08	13	0	0
3	Georgia	13	790	3490	4.42	33	268.46	10	3	0
4	South Carolina	12	773	3227	4.17	25	268.92	10	2	0
5	Michigan St.	13	832	3545	4.26	30	272.69	10	3	0
6	Florida St.	13	859	3575	4.16	25	275.00	9	4	0
7	Illinois	13	842	3720	4.42	31	286.15	7	6	0
8	Wisconsin	13	786	3809	4.85	28	293.00	11	2	0
9	Florida	12	788	3595	4.56	31	299.58	6	6	0
10	Penn St.	12	823	3611	4.39	22	300.92	9	3	0
11	UCF	12	732	3640	4.97	25	303.33	5	7	0
12	Texas	13	865	3979	4.60	32	306.08	8	5	0
13	Temple	13	829	4053	4.89	24	311.77	9	4	0
14	BYU	13	832	4074	4.90	33	313.38	10	3	0
15	Virginia Tech	13	813	4081	5.02	29	313.92	11	2	0
16	Rutgers	13	831	4084	4.91	28	314.15	9	4	0
17	Michigan	12	727	3811	5.24	26	317.58	10	2	0
18	Boise St.	13	806	4171	5.17	33	320.85	12	1	0
19	Vanderbilt	13	871	4196	4.82	35	322.77	6	7	0
20	Arkansas St.	12	846	3908	4.62	28	325.67	10	2	0

 

[Quattro]

So who will have a better QB CU or Stanford next yr?

Remains to be seen. Sorry I can't predict the future like you can but unlike you I have faith in this staff.