Deleted member 807
Guest
It seems the top tier Pac 12 schools have specific specialties. Washington has rowing. Oregon has track. USC, Stanford and Cal have some combination of water polo, swimming, vollyball soccer and track. These schools not only make a point to develop US athletes, but also international athletes.
I suspect CU would be uniquely situated as an Olympic training Mecca for cycling, both road bike and mountain bike. Investments might also enhance CU's output of winter Olympic athletes in Nordic and Alpine events.
To some extent, Nike U has pulled distance running away from Boulder. CU primarily offers partial scholarships for track and XC. Colorado does not actively recruit foreign runners. Coach Wetmore prides himself on developing Americans. If CU and the Pac wanted Colorado to increase the conference's number of Olympic athletes, an easy strategy would be to increase the number of full ride scholarships for athletes competing in running events of 1500M or above (including steeple) and also recruit international athletes to compete at CU.
I suspect CU would be uniquely situated as an Olympic training Mecca for cycling, both road bike and mountain bike. Investments might also enhance CU's output of winter Olympic athletes in Nordic and Alpine events.
To some extent, Nike U has pulled distance running away from Boulder. CU primarily offers partial scholarships for track and XC. Colorado does not actively recruit foreign runners. Coach Wetmore prides himself on developing Americans. If CU and the Pac wanted Colorado to increase the conference's number of Olympic athletes, an easy strategy would be to increase the number of full ride scholarships for athletes competing in running events of 1500M or above (including steeple) and also recruit international athletes to compete at CU.