Get Pac-12 Net on every over the top option and allow independent subscriptions where there is no regular TV option.
Sling TV is available nationwide. So is Dish.
Get Pac-12 Net on every over the top option and allow independent subscriptions where there is no regular TV option.
I also noticed that BTN is on satellite in Canada through Shaw Direct. Why not PACN up there? Sure, we don't have hockey like the Big Ten does, which hurts. But Vancouver is the 3rd largest city up there and it's a Pac-12 neighbor. This should be possible to work out. And since it's not in competition with the US providers, I bet there's a way to do rate cutouts for Canada the same way PACN has done them with Alibaba Group.Get Pac-12 Net on every over the top option and allow independent subscriptions where there is no regular TV option.
But, but, but - NFL Sunday Ticket!!Sling TV is available nationwide. So is Dish.
Yeah. Pac-12 will win this one. Suing on an oral contract is nearly impossible to win.Pac-12 Networks and the Pac-12 conference are being sued by EMG for not paying a marketing fee for the AT&T deal
http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/09/13/pac-12-2/
Failure. Theirs no doubt.if your not on BOTH comcast and directv your network is a failure
if your not on BOTH comcast and directv your network is a failure
Nfl sunday ticket = total failure?
pac 12 is basically "blacked out" in most sports bars in the country....its like asking to get a big sky game on
The Pac-12 Hotline has obtained ratings for the Pac-12 Networks — ratings the conference, by policy, does not disclose.
An initial canvass of the material reminded me of a conversation with commissioner Larry Scott last month.
I mentioned that the lack of transparency with the ratings led to the presumption that viewership totals were low for the Olympic sports.
If the ratings were good — if they justified the resources (i.e., the six regional feeds) — then the conference surely would want them in the public domain.
Sign up for the Pac-12 Hotline newsletter.
“That’s not the reason we don’t share,’’ Scott explained. “We’re delighted with viewership and exposure.”
Upon seeing the ratings, I can understand Scott’s sentiment — at least when it comes to football.
As the Olympic sports broadcasts are concerned, not so much.
Let’s dig in …
Wow
That’s the reason the ratings are relevant: The Pac-12 has undertaken this vast, expensive endeavor in the name of Olympic sports that, at any given time, only a few hundred people are watching.
That is no longer speculation. We now have the evidence.
yup. The presidents wanted what Larry Scott sold them, and it was dumb.
What I've been saying:
Hard to know. But I think it's a damn good bet that if you give your customer what it wants then you're more likely to make a sale.So would a move to one national network convince DirecTV as well?
Hard to know. But I think it's a damn good bet that if you give your customer what it wants then you're more likely to make a sale.
yup. The presidents wanted what Larry Scott sold them, and it was dumb.
Needs to happen though, coaching salaries have gotten out of control in an amateur sport.This statement concerns me:
“It’s highly, highly unlikely that you will see Pac-12 schools doing some of the things other schools have done in terms of coaches salaries. There’a belief that there needs to be some self-imposed limits to all this.”