I disagreeEither way, thats Washington.
I disagreeEither way, thats Washington.
Another reason it's a very good thing that none of us are playing or coaching.I really wish you guys would focus on This weekend...
I really wish you guys would focus on This weekend...
I disagree
Well, it's probably a wash the more I think about it, but beating two separate highly ranked teams looks better on the resume than just one.Why? More my own curiousity here.
Well, it's probably a wash the more I think about it, but beating two separate highly ranked teams looks better on the resume than just one.
If Oregon beats UW this week, UW probably drops to say #13 (either way, top 15). CU beats #13 (top 15) next week. Oregon runs the table, and enters the CCG with only 1 loss, ranked anywhere from #2-7 most likely.
On the flip side, UW wins this week, they remain where they're at most likely, in that 6-7 range. We beat them next week and have that win to our resume, but they also fall to the 12-15 range with 2 losses and stay around there until the CCG, in which they lose to us again.
So, IMO, it basically comes down to beating a top 6-8 team next week or in the CCG, to which I think doing so later against a separate team is far better for the committee than having your best win happen now and a mediocre win later on.
In all honesty, I think it'd be a moot point as a 13-0 CU team with two top 15 wins would never get left out of the CFP (unless of course there are 4-5 other undefeated teams).Agree, but I'd rather have a road win over a then top 6-8 opponent. Not sure anybody in the country (Alabama, Georgia, Clemson, or ND) could be able to flaunt that.
I really wish you guys would focus on This weekend...
Another reason it's a very good thing that none of us are playing or coaching.
That's what the USC threads are for, and that's the great thing about being a fan lol. We can think a few moves ahead.
Why? More my own curiousity here.
Auburn loss on the road > Stanford loss at homeI think a one loss Oregon team who beat UDub and lost an OT game to Stanford after substantial game control would have a better chance than a one loss UDub that lost to an OK SEC team, m albeit early and essentially on the load.
A 13-0 CU would have a better chance than a 12-1 OU or UDub. While it might be fun to think about it, I don’t see it. ESPN runs the simulations every day. Day before yesterday, an undefeated CU was 3/20,000, yesterday it was 1/20,000.
Given these odds, I still think a 12-1 OU is the best shot for a P12 CFP team.
Agree on the surface. But Game control would favor Oregon especially the silly way they lost.Auburn loss on the road > Stanford loss at home
Wat? No, **** Oregon, I hope they lose every game the rest of the year.
No. Root for the North team in a game like that that we play.
Auburn would beat Stanford. And I think UDub is winning this weekend.Agree on the surface. But Game control would favor Oregon especially the silly way they lost.
Auburn would beat Stanford. And I think UDub is winning this weekend.
Either way, we want UDub to win - so whether we win or lose, it looks better for the Buffs.
TeamRankings.com projections as of today.
View attachment 27786
View attachment 27787
View attachment 27788
View attachment 27789
Meh, Arizona hasn’t shown anything and could be done pretty early.
1) at Washington
2) at usc
3) WSU
4) Utah
5) at cal
6) at zona
7) Oregon state
I feel pretty confident about this team battling against interior opponents so I see the bottom three as fairly easy wins as of right now ( obviously injuries change things) but it all pretty much comes down to this weekend. Those top four are going to be tough, especially if we lose on the road tomorrow.
Haha. Not arguing with that...Auburn-Stanford might end up 6-3.
Just not good enough offensively and they are starting to get hit by some bad injuries. Utah is a way bigger challenge.I'd put Cal up there with the top 4. They're a bowl team IMO, but they don't have the horses to compete with Washington, Oregon, Stanford, and Wazzu in that division. That'll be a tough game.
Just not good enough offensively and they are starting to get hit by some bad injuries. Utah is a way bigger challenge.
Just not good enough offensively and they are starting to get hit by some bad injuries. Utah is a way bigger challenge.
That is possible, but there could be a huge motivation gap with Cal too.If Utah is eliminated from the division race but we're not, there's going to be a serious motivation gap in that game, especially with the Holy War coming up a week later.
If Utah is eliminated from the division race but we're not, there's going to be a serious motivation gap in that game, especially with the Holy War coming up a week later.
That is possible, but there could be a huge motivation gap with Cal too.
Not sure how serious a gap there'll be-think back to 2 years ago. They came here having blown a game to an awful Oregon team the week before (which cost them a chance at the South), and that was back and forth until the fumble return by Olugbode. They'll come to play.
I totally agree. If we go in there having sealed up the division, for example, there might be a problem. Luckily, I think they'll be bowl eligible but out of the division race, so there might not be much to play for. IMO, though, we'll still be in a division battle, so we would have motivation for that game, too.
They didn't have the Holy War the next week that year. If there's a motivational issue, and I'm not guaranteeing there will be, that's going to play a large role.