McMurphy has us at 17
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
Polls, rankings and bowl projections
- Thread starter Daaah
- Start date
this tweet feels promising
No issues with Okie St being ranked. MSU is not unreasonable.
Tech should NOT be ranked.
26th in the AP, im good with that... part of me didn't want any more of a bullseye on us vs UCLA
https://collegefootball.ap.org/poll
https://collegefootball.ap.org/poll
liverflukes
Resident Bear
You mean virginia tech, right?
Texas Tech put a defensive clinic on Okie Lite IN STILLWATER and whipped that booty. No way okie lite should be above the red raiders.
somebody
Well-Known Member
A flukes sighting!
You need a Hug?
Because the writers don’t care about what happened 3 weeks ago. They care about current record and most recent game. That and page views/clicks.
BehindEnemyLines
beware the habu
I have a big issue with okie lite being ranked. Their ooc opponents were weak and the pokes were not impressive in those wins. Then, at home, they got spanked by an unranked team.
You need a Hug?
Well, well.
Welcome back, Yogi.
What’s Flukes doing with the bear?
Flukes = Trump. Confirmed.
Kinda what I thought would happen.
This. Even after UCLA, I’m cool with one more week of ORV.
Next week's games:
#18 Texas @ KSU
#19 Oregon @ #24 CAL
#20 BYU vs #11 Washington
#21 Michigan St vs Central Michigan
#22 Duke vs VT
#23 MIssissippi St vs Florida
#24 CAL vs #19 Oregon
#25 TT vs #12 WVU
There should be a few losses in there.
#18 Texas @ KSU
#19 Oregon @ #24 CAL
#20 BYU vs #11 Washington
#21 Michigan St vs Central Michigan
#22 Duke vs VT
#23 MIssissippi St vs Florida
#24 CAL vs #19 Oregon
#25 TT vs #12 WVU
There should be a few losses in there.
Oregon moves up a spot after losing?
Um?
The Ogre
Well-Known Member
Please read the link: @liverflukes, the Malady Rejected
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3088844/
Knowledge is power.
Oregon outplayed Stanford the whole game and if they take a knee, they win in regulation. That was impressive in losing.
Yes. I give them credit for their stupidity vs an intellectually superrior opponent. Dumber than dirt, they were.
Sure, but teams aren’t supposed to be rewarded for effort or being close. Maybe Oregon is still a top 25 team, but actually moving up in a loss? No.
So you don't think that consideration should be given to who you play? Hypothetical, the #25 team plays Alabama, beats them in every way except loses in OT. They can't move up to #24? Come on man.
If aTm had kept it within 2 scores at Alabama, I would have been ok with them in the Top 25 despite being 2-2. Yes, winning matters. But it also matters if you can go toe-to-toe with Clemson and Alabama. There aren't 23 other teams in the country I'm confident can do that. I believe in playing a tough schedule and we can't be penalizing a close loss to Clemson while rewarding a win over New Hampshire when comparing 2 teams. Frankly, I think if aTm goes 8-4 with a schedule that includes Alabama, Auburn, Clemson and LSU (plus Miss State and Kentucky) -- that's better to me than just about anyone else's 10-2 as long as the losses are competitive.
I see at least 8 losses in there...8 wins too.